Court filing
Declaration of Susan Fahringer ISO Opposition to Plaintiffs' Rule… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 114.1)
Summary
In Document 114-1, filed 10/11/22 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Susan D. Fahringer, a partner with Perkins Coie for Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation, declares in support of its opposition to Plaintiffs' motion to modify the case schedule. She attaches Exhibit A, a summary table of the history of case schedule extensions, and Exhibit B, an email exchange with Andre Mura dated October 3 through October 6, 2022. She says that on a later call Plaintiffs' counsel would not discuss a briefing schedule for potential Daubert motions unless Thomson Reuters also agreed to extend the deadlines to amend the Complaint and to move for class certification, and that the parties have not meaningfully conferred on a Daubert schedule. She also states that Plaintiffs' counsel Jennifer Bennett has not participated in any discovery conference, deposition, email exchange, or hearing to date.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Declaration of Susan Fahringer ISO Opposition to Plaintiffs' Rule… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 114.1).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 114-1. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-10-11-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-114-1-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-114-1/
, SHA-256 bed3e9f7fabc66b41886e129e57235203b984f4fb8766fbe8d89ab37408f5b41.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 114-1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 2
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
3 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 EEarl@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
6
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
7 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 PERKINS COIE LLP
Telephone: 206.359.8000 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
8 Facsimile: 206.359.9000 Dallas, TX 75201-3347
Attorneys for Defendant Telephone: 214.965.7700
9 Thomson Reuters Corporation Facsimile: 214.965.7799
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
16
individually and on behalf of all others
17 similarly situated, DECLARATION OF SUSAN D.
FAHRINGER IN SUPPORT OF
18 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS
CORPORATION’S OPPOSITION TO
19 v. PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 16(B)(4) MOTION TO
MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE
20 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
21 Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC DECLARATION OF SUSAN
D. FAHRINGER
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 114-1 Filed 10/11/22 Page 2 of 2
1 I, Susan D. Fahringer, declare as follows:
2 1. I am a partner with Perkins Coie LLC and am one of the attorneys for Defendant
3 Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”) in this case. I make this Declaration based
4 on my personal knowledge and am competent to testify to its contents.
5 2. Attached as Exhibit A is a summary table setting forth the history of case schedule
6 extensions in this case (Dkts. ## 59 and 78), along with the extension Plaintiffs currently seek
7 (Dkt. # 113-3), with respect to the deadlines to move for class certification, to amend the
8 complaint, and for discovery.
9 3. Attached as Exhibit B is an email exchange between Andre Mura, counsel for
10 Plaintiffs, and myself, dated October 3 through October 6, 2022, discussing Thomson Reuters’
11 questions and response to the extension Plaintiffs now seek. Following the email exchange, I
12 spoke by phone with Andre Mura and Zeke Wald, counsel for Plaintiffs. During that call, counsel
13 for Plaintiffs would not discuss a briefing schedule for potential Daubert motions unless
14 Thomson Reuters also agreed to extend the deadlines to amend the Complaint and to move for
15 class certification. The parties have not meaningfully conferred on an appropriate briefing
16 schedule for Daubert motions.
17 4. Plaintiffs’ counsel Jennifer Bennett has not participated in any discovery
18 conference, deposition, email exchange, or hearing in this case to date.
19
20 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
21 Executed this 11th day of October, 2022, in Seattle, Washington.
22
By: s/ Susan D. Fahringer
23 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
24
Attorney for Defendants
25 Thomson Reuters Corporation
26
27
28
NO. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC -1- DECLARATION OF SUSAN
D. FAHRINGER
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.114.1.pdf
- Size
- 128,867 bytes
- SHA-256
- bed3e9f7fabc66b41886e129e57235203b984f4fb8766fbe8d89ab37408f5b41
- Original
- PACER (login required)