OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 109 Joint Discovery Letter Brief ) Defendant… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 112)

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC        Document 112    Filed 09/30/22   Page 1 of 2




 1   Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567                Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
     SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                       GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2   Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice                  PERKINS COIE LLP
     NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                         3150 Porter Drive
 3
     Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                       Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4   EEarl@perkinscoie.com                            Telephone: 650.838.4300
     Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice                   Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5   AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
     PERKINS COIE LLP                                 Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6   1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                    HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
     Seattle, WA 98101-3099                           PERKINS COIE LLP
 7
     Telephone: 206.359.8000                          500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8   Facsimile: 206.359.9000                          Dallas, TX 75201-3347
                                                      Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9   Attorneys for Defendant                          Facsimile: 214.965.7799
     Thomson Reuters Corporation
10

11
                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
                           NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
                                   SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14

15
     CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                       Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
16   SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf
     of all others similarly situated,            DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS’
17                                                RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
                         Plaintiffs,              REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
18                                                REGARDING JOINT DISCOVERY
           v.                                     LETTER BRIEF (ECF NO. 109)
19

20   THOMSON REUTERS                              Judge: Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
     CORPORATION,
21
                         Defendant.
22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC             -1-               THOMSON REUTERS’ RESPONSE TO
                                                     PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC           Document 112         Filed 09/30/22      Page 2 of 2




 1          Thomson Reuters does not oppose Plaintiffs’ request for oral argument but respectfully
 2   asks the Court to grant Thomson Reuters leave to file its own declaration in response to Plaintiffs’
 3   declaration should Plaintiffs be granted leave to file such a declaration on this matter.
 4

 5
      Dated: September 30, 2022                          PERKINS COIE LLP
 6

 7                                                       By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
                                                             Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
 8                                                           SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
 9                                                       Attorneys for Defendant
                                                         Thomson Reuters Corporation
10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                   -2-               THOMSON REUTERS’ RESPONSE TO
                                                            PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.112.0.pdf

Size

108,081 bytes

SHA-256

cd62ef0afedcfdd0de254aa4ea05435cfe65864ee1b03b079d5aca6230f5f929

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.112.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)