Proposed Order Regarding the Parties' Joint Discovery Letter by Cat… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 110)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Regarding the Parties' Joint Discovery Letter, Document 110, filed 09/22/22 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, one page. The order recites the parties' Joint Letter Brief Regarding Defendant's Responses to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Requests for Production (Dkt. 95). It would provide that Plaintiffs may select listed permissible purposes from CLEAR's menu of options for their activity in CLEAR under the parties' agreement regarding access to CLEAR for civil discovery. The date line is blank above the name of The Hon. Kandis A. Westmore, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

           Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC            Document 110         Filed 09/22/22      Page 1 of 1



                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
 1                               NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 2                                    SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

 3   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,                       Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
     individually and on behalf of all others
 4   similarly situated,                                   [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
                                                           THE PARTIES’ JOINT DISCOVERY
 5
                     Plaintiffs,                           LETTER
 6          v.
                                                           Judge: Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
 7   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,

 8                   Defendant
 9

10          THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Letter Brief Regarding

11   Defendant’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Second Set of Requests for Production, Dkt. 95.

12          Having considered the parties’ Joint Letter Brief, Plaintiffs’ unopposed proposed order, and

13   additional evidence and oral argument, in addition to the Court’s ruling on the parties’ dispute, the

14   Court ORDERS as follows:

15   1.     Permissible Use: Plaintiffs may select the following permissible purposes from CLEAR’s

16   menu of options for their activity in CLEAR pursuant to the terms of the parties’ agreement regarding

17   access to CLEAR for civil discovery. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act: For use in complying with a properly

18   authorized civil, criminal or regulatory investigation, or subpoena or summons by federal, state, or local

19   authorities. Driver’s Privacy Protection Act: For use in connection with a civil, criminal or arbitral legal

20   proceeding or legal research. Voters: Use in connection with a non-commercial purpose.

21          IT IS SO ORDERED.

22    Dated:
                                                              By:
23                                                                  The Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
24                                                                  United States Magistrate Judge

25

26

27

28
                                              1
               [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER
                                   Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.110.0.pdf

Size

348,122 bytes

SHA-256

d3b9b1664951bc244a4a1545d2d94c1a435976fe7319d6675e56f6ca2693a5f3

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.110.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)