Court filing
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 77)
Summary
In Document 77, filed 02/28/22 in Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC before Hon. Edward M. Chen, Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz and Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation stipulate to amend the case schedule, with a proposed order. The parties say an approximately 60-day extension is appropriate, noting that Plaintiffs' lead counsel Andre M. Mura is serving as a juror in a California Superior Court trial expected to run from February 28 to approximately March 25, and that this is the first request to modify the schedule. A table moves disclosure of primary class certification experts from March 1, 2022 to May 2, 2022 and the class certification hearing from December 8, 2022 to March 16, 2023, or another date the Court deems appropriate. It also moves the close of fact discovery from February 8, 2023 to May 15, 2023.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 77).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 77. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-02-28-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-77-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-77-0/
, SHA-256 6850b9db7189e22b14a446ffb8dbb1bc7022048b031cc213155ce86d953c33f2.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 77 Filed 02/28/22 Page 1 of 7
1 Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)
2 David Stein (SBN 257465)
Jeffrey B. Kosbie (SBN 305424)
3 GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
4 505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, California 94612
5 Telephone: (510) 350-9700
Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
6 ehg@classlawgroup.com
amm@classlawgroup.com
7 ds@classlawgroup.com
8 jbk@classlawgroup.com
9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
10 [Additional counsel on signature page]
11
12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
16 individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE
17 SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiffs,
18 v. Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
19
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 77 Filed 02/28/22 Page 2 of 7
1 Whereas, the Court entered a case schedule on August 26, 2022;
2 Whereas, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Andre M. Mura, is serving as a juror in a trial in California
3 Superior Court expected to run from February 28 to approximately March 25;
4 Whereas, Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz and Defendant Thomson Reuters
5 Corporation, by and through their respective counsel, continue to work diligently through discovery
6 issues in this complex case in advance of the class certification stage;
7 Whereas, the parties agree that an approximately 60-day extension of the case schedule is
8 appropriate under the circumstances;
9 Whereas, the parties will not be prejudiced by the agreed-upon modification of the case
10 schedule, and this is the first request to modify it; and
11 Whereas, the parties have prepared the following table summarizing the agreed-upon proposed
12 changes to the case schedule:
13
Current schedule Event Proposed Amended Schedule
14
15 March 1, 2022 Disclosure of Primary Class May 2, 2022
Certification Experts
16
May 17, 2022 Disclosure of Class Certification August 8, 2022
17 Rebuttal Experts
18
19 June 17, 2022 Close of Class Certification Expert September 8, 2022
Discovery
20
21 June 28, 2022 Joint Status Report Due No change proposed
22
July 1, 2022 Deadline to pursue private mediation September 22, 2022
23
24
July 5, 2022 Status Conference, 2:30 pm No change proposed
25
26
27
28 1
STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 77 Filed 02/28/22 Page 3 of 7
1 July 18, 2022 Deadline to Amend Pleadings and October 10, 2022
Plaintiffs’ deadline to Move for
2 Class Certification
3
July 18, 2022 Deadline for Plaintiff to File Class October 10, 2022
4
Certification Motion
5
September 12, 2022 Deadline for Opposition to Class December 15, 2022
6 Certification
7
October 24, 2022 Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply January 26, 2023
8 Supporting Class Certification
9
10 December 8, 2022 Hearing on Motion for Class March 16, 2023, or such other
Certification date as the Court deems
11 appropriate
12 February 8, 2023 Close of Fact Discovery May 15, 2023
13
14 The parties shall meet and
confer within 14 days of a
15 ruling on the motion for
class certification to set
16 Disclosure of Trial Experts
deadlines for trial expert No change proposed.
disclosures and discovery,
17
pre-trial deadlines, and a
18 trial date.
19 Defer setting this deadline
until after a ruling on class Disclosure of Rebuttal Trial Experts No change proposed.
20 certification.
21 Defer setting this deadline Close of Expert Discovery No change proposed.
until after a ruling on class
22 certification.
23 Defer setting this deadline Dispositive Motion Deadline No change proposed.
24 until after a ruling on class
certification.
25
Defer setting this deadline Pretrial conference No change proposed.
26 until after a ruling on class
certification.
27
28 2
STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 77 Filed 02/28/22 Page 4 of 7
1 Defer setting this deadline Trial No change proposed.
until after a ruling on class
2 certification.
3
4 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to Court approval, that the case
5 schedule shall be extended as reflected in the table above.
6
7
8 DATED: February 28, 2022 GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
9
By: /s/ David Stein
10 Eric H. Gibbs
11 Andre M. Mura
David Stein
12 Jeffrey B. Kosbie
505 14th Street, Suite 1110
13 Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 350-9700
14
Fax: (510) 350-9701
15 ehg@classlawgroup.com
amm@classlawgroup.com
16 ds@classlawgroup.com
jbk@classlawgroup.com
17
Jennifer D. Bennett
18
Neil K. Sawhney
19 GUPTA WESSLER PLLC
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
20 San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 573-0336
21 jennifer@guptawessler.com
neil@guptawessler.com
22
23 Albert Fox Cahn (pro hac vice)
SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
24 OVERSIGHT PROJECT
40 Rector Street, 9th Floor
25 New York, NY 10006
26 albert@stopspying.org
27
28 3
STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 77 Filed 02/28/22 Page 5 of 7
Benjamin Elga (pro hac vice)
1 JUSTICE CATALYST LAW INC.
2 123 William Street, 16th floor
New York, NY 10038
3 Telephone: (518) 732-6703
belga@justicecatalyst.org
4
5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
DATED: February 28, 2022 PERKINS COIE LLP
7
8 By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
9 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
Nicola C. Menaldo (pro hac vice)
10 Anna M. Thompson (pro hac vice)
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
11 Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: (206) 359-8000
12 Facsimile: (206) 359-9000
13 SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com
14 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
15 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
PERKINS COIE LLP
16
3150 Porter Drive
17 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: (650) 838-4300
18 Facsimile: (650) 838-4350
GGallego@perkinscoie.com
19
Attorneys for Defendant
20 Thomson Reuters Corporation
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 4
STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 77 Filed 02/28/22 Page 6 of 7
1 [PROPOSED] ORDER
2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4 DATED: __________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
5 United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 5
STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 77 Filed 02/28/22 Page 7 of 7
1 ATTESTATION
2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
3 has been obtained from the other signatory.
4
5 /s/ David Stein
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 6
STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.77.0.pdf
- Size
- 190,799 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6850b9db7189e22b14a446ffb8dbb1bc7022048b031cc213155ce86d953c33f2
- Original
- PACER (login required)