Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Thurmond et. al. USA v. Thurmond et al. — U.S. District Court, S.D. Ga., Augusta Division Scheduling Order as to Brandon Jamal Thurmond — USA v. Thurmond et. al. (Dkt. 29, S.D. Ga.)

Court filing

Scheduling Order as to Brandon Jamal Thurmond — USA v. Thurmond et. al. (Dkt. 29, S.D. Ga.)

Filed April 21, 2023 in USA v. Thurmond et. al.; one of 46 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Filed2023-04-21

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia · No. 1:23-cr-00021-JRH-BKE · Doc. 29 · 2023-04-21 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
AUGUSTA DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
 
v. 
 
CASE NO.: 123-021 
 
 
BRANDON JAMAL THURMOND 
 
La’KYERA Me’LIKA THURMOND 
 
 
 
 
SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER 
In consideration of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Local Criminal Rules, 
and the discussion at the arraignments on April 17, 2023 and April 20, 2023, the Court enters the 
following deadlines, findings, and instructions. 
EVENT 
DEADLINE 
Government Notice (Fed. R. Evid. 404(b))  
May 8, 2023 
Pretrial Motions by All Parties 
July 17, 2023 
Government Expert Disclosures (Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(G)) 
July 17, 2023 
Status Report (No Motions Filed) 
July 24, 2023 
Responses to Pretrial Motions 
July 31, 2023 
Status Report (Motions Filed) 
August 7, 2023 
Defense Expert Disclosures (Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C)) 
September 15, 2023 
 
Status Report.  The parties shall submit the attached status report on the date set forth 
above, and failure to do so may result in the Court terminating all outstanding motions as 
resolved or waived. 
Speedy Trial Findings.  The Court finds, as a matter of fact and law, the time the parties 
requested to review discovery, prepare and file pretrial motions, and obtain expert witness 
Case 1:23-cr-00021-JRH-BKE     Document 29     Filed 04/21/23     Page 1 of 5

 2
reports is not for the purpose of delay, but in the furtherance of justice, and to protect 
Defendant’s right to a fair trial.  The Court also finds the request is for the purpose of allowing 
reasonable time necessary, assuming the exercise of due diligence, for counsel to effectively 
prepare their case in that counsel needs additional time to review discovery, prepare and file 
pretrial motions, and obtain expert witness reports.  Therefore, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 
3161(h)(7), and on the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by granting the 
extension outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial, the Court 
grants the requested time.  The period of time—April 17, 2023 through and including September 
15, 2023—is excluded in computing the time within which trial of this matter may commence.   
Pretrial Motion Instructions.  A party must file a separate motion for each form of 
relief sought; consolidated motions are not permitted.  A responding party may file a 
consolidated response to multiple motions when doing so does not create confusion or 
ambiguity.   
In multi-defendant cases, a defendant shall not file a motion that merely adopts or 
incorporates by reference a motion or argument by a co-defendant.  Each defendant must file a 
separate motion containing a complete discussion of the evidence and arguments.  The Clerk 
assigns a unique number to each defendant in a multi-defendant case.  For example, in case 4:23-
CR-55, the Clerk assigns the number one to the first defendant:  4:23-CR-55-001.  All motions 
and responses in multi-defendant cases must include the defendant-specific case number . 
The Government and defense counsel are reminded of their responsibility under Federal 
Rule of Criminal Procedure 16.1 and Local Criminal Rule 16.1 to confer regarding discovery.  
Considering the Government’s customary practice of providing liberal discovery, many (if not 
all) routine discovery motions may be satisfied without the need for Court intervention.  
Case 1:23-cr-00021-JRH-BKE     Document 29     Filed 04/21/23     Page 2 of 5

 3
Rule 5 Instruction.  In accordance with Fed. R. Crim P. 5(f)(1), the Court confirms the 
prosecutor’s obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defense in accordance with 
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny.  Failure to timely perform these 
obligations may result in consequences, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury 
instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions.  Given this confirmation, 
generalized motions seeking assurance of the Government’ s compliance are unnecessary. 
Proposed Voir Dire and Jury Charges.  Unless otherwise instructed by the presiding 
District Judge, counsel shall file all requests to charge and proposed voir dire questions at least 
seven days before jury selection.   
Witness Subpoenas.  Counsel representing indigent defendants must make requests for 
witness subpoenas or writs for the production of prisoner witnesses at least fourteen days before 
the evidentiary hearing or trial.  Requests for witness subpoenas must articulate specific facts 
demonstrating both the relevancy and necessity of the requested witnesses’ testimony.  
 
 SO ORDERED this 21st day of April, 2023, at Augusta, Georgia. 
 
 
 
Case 1:23-cr-00021-JRH-BKE     Document 29     Filed 04/21/23     Page 3 of 5

 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
Choose an item. DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
 
v. 
 
 
CASE NO.: :-CR- 
 
 
,  
 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
 
JOINT STATUS REPORT 
 
I. 
Date of Status Report Conference: _______________ 
II. 
Conference Attendees: 
Name 
Role 
 
 
 
 
 
III. 
Pretrial Motions. 
܆ 
All pretrial motions have been satisfied or otherwise resolved. 
܆ 
The parties have not resolved the following pretrial motions(s) and will require a ruling 
from the Court to settle the actual controversy or dispute: 
Motion Title and Docket Number 
Opposed 
Oral Argument 
Requested 
Evidentiary 
Hearing 
Requested 
 
Y/N 
Y/N 
Y/N 
 
Y/N 
Y/N 
Y/N 
 
Y/N 
Y/N 
Y/N 
 
Case 1:23-cr-00021-JRH-BKE     Document 29     Filed 04/21/23     Page 4 of 5

 5
Complete Remaining Portions Only In Judge Baker Cases 
 
IV. 
Are the parties prepared to proceed to trial?  If so, list three potential dates for a 
telephonic status conference with the presiding District Judge.  Yes/No 
Dates for Telephonic Conference 
 
 
 
 
V. 
Do the parties believe the case will result in a negotiated plea agreement and, if so, do the 
parties request additional time (not to exceed 30 days) for further plea negotiations and 
how much time do the parties request?  Yes/No 
Additional Time Requested 
 
 
 
This day__________ 
 
/s/ 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
 
/s/ 
 
 
 
 
  
Defense Counsel 
 
 
Case 1:23-cr-00021-JRH-BKE     Document 29     Filed 04/21/23     Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gasd.89394.29.0.pdf
Size
204,529 bytes
SHA-256
c25f34a8aefab357fc30b90eb782813791879885a670243bcd707690215cc3ec
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gasd.89394.29.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top