ORDER Granting Revised Motion to File Documents Under Seal re:… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 654)

Summary

An order filed February 3, 2026 as Document 654 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, with Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel named in the caption. The order grants the plaintiffs' revised motion to file documents under seal relating to their opposition to the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment. It finds that the plaintiffs have shown compelling reasons for sealing, citing Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). The court will keep under seal portions of the plaintiffs' opposition, of their response to Bank of America, N.A.'s separate statement, and of their additional statement of facts. The order applies to all actions and runs two pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB         Document 654     Filed 02/03/26   PageID.55610    Page
                                          1 of 2


 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 9                        SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
   IN RE BANK OF AMERICA                         Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
11 CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT
   BENEFITS LITIGATION                           ORDER GRANTING REVISED
12
                                                 MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
13                                               UNDER SEAL RE: PLAINTIFFS’
                                                 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
14
                                                 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
15                                               JUDGMENT
16
17                                                Judge: Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel
                                                  Ctrm: 12A
18
19
20 This Document Relates to All Actions
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
     Order Granting Revised Motion to File Documents Under Seal re: Plaintiffs’ Opposition to
     Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB         Document 654     Filed 02/03/26   PageID.55611     Page
                                          2 of 2


 1                                           ORDER
 2         Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Revised Motion to File Documents Under Seal, the
 3
     motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have shown compelling reasons to file these documents
 4
     under seal. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).
 5
           The Court will maintain the following materials under seal:
 6
           1. portions of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary
 7
              Judgment;
 8
           2. portions of Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant Bank of America, N.A. Separate
 9
              Statement; and
10
           3. portions of Plaintiffs’ Additional Statement of Facts in Opposition to Defendant’s
11
              Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
12
           IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
     Dated: February 3, 2026
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
     Order Granting Revised Motion to File Documents Under Seal re: Plaintiffs’               1
     Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
     Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.654.0.pdf

Size

211,692 bytes

SHA-256

68483ce9474c4091b50ba8f94780a14369416060f64ca19f7c7352e4b64c77d8

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.654.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)