Court filing
Exhibit PX209 — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 634.210)
No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 634-210 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
Exhibit PX 209, filed January 9, 2026 as Document 634-210 in Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB. The exhibit is a preliminary injunction dated June 2, 2021 in Jennifer Yick, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., Case No. 21-cv-00376-VC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, entered on language the parties crafted with Magistrate Judge Kim. It bars the bank from considering its automated Claim Fraud Filter in resolving unauthorized transaction claims on EDD prepaid debit cards or in freezing class members' accounts. It requires the bank to reopen claims closed or denied based solely on that filter, give written notices, and staff dedicated toll-free Claims Initiation and Fraud Call Centers. The order requires no bond and carries the name of United States District Judge Vince Chhabria.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB Document 634-210 Filed 01/09/26 PageID.53844
Page 1 of 6
PX 209
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
Case 3:21-cv-00376-VC Document 103
634-210
Filed Filed
06/02/21
01/09/26
Page 1 of 5
PageID.53845
Page 2 of 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JENNIFER YICK, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00376-VC
Plaintiffs,
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 64, 100
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendant.
With the assistance of Magistrate Judge Kim, the plaintiffs and defendants worked
together to craft preliminary injunction language that is designed to protect the class members
from future harm while minimizing disruption to the defendant’s operations. This language is an
improvement over what was presented by the plaintiffs in support of their motion. The hardship
to the defendant from this injunction is outweighed by its benefits to the class members. The
injunction is also in the public interest. Accordingly, in accordance with the language submitted
by the parties, and for the reasons discussed in the order issued on May 17, 2021:
Bank of America, N.A. (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s officers, directors, agents,
employees, representatives, and all persons acting under, in concert or participation with, or for
them (“Defendant”) are preliminarily enjoined in the administration of prepaid debit cards for
Employment Development Department (“EDD”) unemployment or disability benefits issued by
Defendant to members of the certified class as follows:
(1) Defendant shall be prohibited from considering the results of the Bank’s initial
automated claims fraud filter (Claim Fraud Filter) in investigating or resolving unauthorized
transaction error claims (see 12 C.F.R. 1005.11) (Claims).
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
Case 3:21-cv-00376-VC Document 103
634-210
Filed Filed
06/02/21
01/09/26
Page 2 of 5
PageID.53846
Page 3 of 6
(2) a. Defendant shall be prohibited from denying or closing Claims or denying
provisional or permanent credit to claimants’ accounts without conducting and concluding an
investigation into the alleged unauthorized transaction, pursuant to EFTA and Regulation E.
b. Defendant shall be prohibited from denying or closing claims without providing
the claimant a written explanation of the findings of its investigation, pursuant to EFTA and
Regulation E.
(3) Defendant shall not consider the results of the Bank’s Claim Fraud Filter as a basis
for freezing card accounts of any Class Member.
(4) a. Beginning ten (10) days after the entry of this Order, Defendant shall reopen any
Claim that it closed or denied based solely upon the results of its Claim Fraud Filter and that it
has not previously paid or previously reopened and investigated (Previously Closed Claim).
Defendant may stagger the reopening of such Claims in roughly equal amounts over thirty (30)
additional days.
b. For Previously Closed Claims filed by a class member who has not yet
authenticated their identity through either EDD (in the knowledge of the Bank) or the Bank,
Defendant shall, within ten (10) days of reopening, and thereafter at least weekly for five weeks,
send the class member a written notice (by mail and email, if available) explaining the basis for
the original denial; that the claim has been reopened; what steps they need to take to authenticate
their identity (which may include presenting identification at a Bank branch or by calling the
dedicated toll free number for the Fraud Call Center referred to in paragraph 9); that if they do
not authenticate their identity within 45 calendar days of the original notice, the claim will be
denied; and that if they authenticate their identity, the Bank will commence and complete the
investigation and resolve the claim within 45 calendar days of the authentication and, if such
claim has not been resolved within 10 business days of the authentication, provide provisional
credit in the amount of the alleged error(s) to the account. Persons subject to this Paragraph 4(b)
are subject to Paragraph 5(a) if they authenticate.
(5) a. For Previously Closed Claims that were filed by a class member who has
2
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
Case 3:21-cv-00376-VC Document 103
634-210
Filed Filed
06/02/21
01/09/26
Page 3 of 5
PageID.53847
Page 4 of 6
authenticated their identity through either EDD (in the knowledge of the Bank) or the Bank,
Defendant shall complete the investigation and resolve the claim within 45 calendar days of the
entry of this Order (or of the date the class member authenticates their identity, if later) and, if
the claim has not been resolved within 10 business days of the entry of this Order (or of the date
the class member authenticates their identity, if later), provide provisional credit in the amount of
the alleged error(s).
b. For any Previously Closed Claims that were filed by a class member who has
authenticated their identity through either EDD (in the knowledge of the Bank) or the Bank, but
the Claim has never been reopened, Defendant shall reopen such Claim within ten (10) days of
the entry of this Order and Defendant shall complete the investigation and resolve the claim
within 45 calendar days of reopening and, if the claim has not been resolved within 10 business
days of reopening, provide provisional credit in the amount of the alleged error(s).
(6) In addition to Claims that Defendant reopens pursuant to paragraphs 4 and 5(b),
Defendant shall, upon request from the affected cardholder, reopen any Claim that it closed or
denied on or after January 1, 2020.
(7) Within 10 days of the entry of this Order (by mail and email, if available) or after the
date of the blocking (by mail, within three (3) business days, and email, if available, within one
(1) business day), whichever is later, Defendant shall give written notice to class members whose
accounts are blocked solely based upon its Claims Fraud Filter that explains that the Bank will
promptly unblock their account if the class member authenticates their identity. The written
notice shall explain: the basis for the previous block; what steps the class member needs to take
to authenticate their identity (which may include presenting identification at a Bank branch or by
calling the dedicated toll free number at the Fraud Call Center referred to in paragraph 9); that if
they do not authenticate their identity, their account will remain blocked or will be closed; and
that they have the right to ask EDD to issue future benefits payments by paper check instead of
by the Bank Debit Card.
(8) Defendant shall:
3
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
Case 3:21-cv-00376-VC Document 103
634-210
Filed Filed
06/02/21
01/09/26
Page 4 of 5
PageID.53848
Page 5 of 6
a. As soon as practicable, and in no event later than twenty (20) days of the entry of this
Order, establish a dedicated toll-free number to enable class members to directly reach the
Claims Initiation Call Center, which shall be staffed by customer service representatives (CSRs)
who are trained to handle Claims intake;
b. Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, the Claims Initiation Call Center
hours to receive calls shall consist of at least fourteen (14) hours on weekdays and ten (10) hours
on Saturdays, which shall be expanded within forty-five days of the entry of this Order to include
ten (10) hours on Sundays, and expanded within sixty days of the entry of this Order to include
24 hours per day, 7 days per week coverage; and
c. As soon as practicable after the establishment and successful testing of the dedicated
toll-free number for the Claims Initiation Call Center, but in no event later than ten (10) days
thereafter, and at least monthly thereafter, provide written notices (by mail and email, if
available) to all class members regarding the available toll free number and providing the
information in paragraphs 6, and (8)(a) and (b).
(9) Defendant shall:
a. As soon as practicable, and in no event later than twenty (20) days after the entry of
this Order, establish a dedicated toll-free number to enable class members to directly reach the
Fraud Call Center, which shall be available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and which shall
be staffed by CSRs who are trained to authenticate identity and resolve challenges to blocked
accounts.
b. As soon as practicable after the establishment and successful testing of the dedicated
toll-free number for the Fraud Call Center, but in no event later than ten (10) days thereafter, and
thereafter at least weekly, provide written notice (by mail and email, if available) to all class
members whose accounts are blocked of the availability of this dedicated toll-free number.
(10) Defendant shall, within 20 days of the entry of this Order:
a. Staff the Claims Initiation Call Center and Fraud Call Centers, such that the average
speed to answer calls from Class Members for these centers is no more than five minutes, 90% of
4
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
Case 3:21-cv-00376-VC Document 103
634-210
Filed Filed
06/02/21
01/09/26
Page 5 of 5
PageID.53849
Page 6 of 6
the time, separately measured for the Claims Initiation and Fraud Call Centers and based on all
callers to such centers (rather than just calls by Class Members).
b. Train and require CSRs in the Claims Initiation Call Center to request email contact
information from a claimant at the time a claim is filed (if email is not already available for that
claimant), so that the Bank may use that information to contact the claimant regarding
authentication, if and to the extent this is consented to by EDD.
c. Train and require CSRs in the Fraud Call Center to immediately inform cardholders
who are unable to authenticate their identity by phone that they have the option of authenticating
their identity at a Bank branch.
(11) Within 10 business days of the entry of this Order, Defendants shall provide email
and mail notice to all Class Members of their rights under paragraphs (1) through (7) of this
Order.
(12) Paragraphs 2 and 4 of this Order shall not apply to,
a. Claims made with respect to accounts that EDD has found to be disqualified or not
entitled to benefits, or has requested an account freeze; or
b. Claims made with respect to accounts that Defendant has frozen or blocked based on
(i) receipt of legal process or (ii) information provided or made available by law enforcement, or
(iii) the outcome of an investigation of suspicious facts and circumstances related to an
individual cardholder developed independent of the Claim (if such cardholder has been sent a
notice that the action has occurred and a statement of what the cardholder can do in response).
Defendant shall implement the requirement of paragraph 1 as soon as practicable but in
no event more than seven (7) days from the entry of this Order.
There shall be no bond required.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 2, 2021
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
5
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.casd.709615.634.210.pdf
- Size
- 152,248 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1dcbdf8c1ee6ba7c114d2586d8a0152481235f4d508589afc60a5c5640a915ed
- Original
- PACER (login required)