14AA — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 591-25, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 591-25 · 2025-10-17 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

DX 14.AA 
REDACTED VERSION OF 
DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO 
BE SEALED PURSUANT TO 
STIPULATED 
PROTECTIVE ORDER 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 591-25     Filed 10/17/25     PageID.41280 
Page 1 of 6

Videotaped Deposition of 
Melissa Ramirez 
February 11, 2025 
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation 
antus 
URT lit.EPORTIN,G 
www.aptusCR.com I 86&. 9 99.8310 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 591-25     Filed 10/17/25     PageID.41281 
Page 2 of 6

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
Melissa Ramirez 
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
IN RE BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
CASE NO. 
3:21-MD-02992-GPC­
MSB 
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL 
ACTIONS 
REMOTE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MELISSA RAMIREZ 
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2025 
JOB NO. : 
10157864 
REPORTED BY HEIDI FUEHRER, CSR 14145 
www.aptusCR.com 
Page 1 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 591-25     Filed 10/17/25     PageID.41282 
Page 3 of 6

Melissa Ramirez 
Page 30 
www.aptusCR.com 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 591-25     Filed 10/17/25     PageID.41283 
Page 4 of 6

Melissa Ramirez 
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation 
Page 31 
www.aptusCR.com 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 591-25     Filed 10/17/25     PageID.41284 
Page 5 of 6

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
Melissa Ramirez 
In Re Bank of America CA Unemployment Benefits Litigation 
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 
ss. 
I, HEIDI FUEHRER, CSR No. 14145, in and for the 
State of California, do hereby certify: 
That prior to being examined, the witness named 
in the foregoing deposition was by me duly sworn to 
testify to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but 
the truth; 
That said deposition was taken down by me in 
shorthand at the time and place therein named and 
thereafter reduced to typewriting under my direction, 
and the same is a true, correct, and complete transcript 
of said proceedings; 
That if the foregoing pertains to the original 
transcript of a deposition in a Federal Case, before 
completion of the proceedings, review of the transcript 
{ 
} Was { X} was not required. 
I further certify that I am not interested in 
the event of the action. 
2025. 
Witness my hand this 12th day of February, 
Certified Shorthand Reporter 
for the State of California 
www.aptusCR.com 
Page 98 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 591-25     Filed 10/17/25     PageID.41285 
Page 6 of 6

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.591.25.pdf

Size

195,918 bytes

SHA-256

6e69462c6e1536be4d39672cdb34b0d5fa529fbd28fe237f060e2cf27a1c7d2d

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.591.25.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)