Magistrate's Criminal Minutes — Arraignment

Summary

Magistrate's Criminal Minutes for an arraignment, plea and sentence form, Document 18 filed 08/11/23 in Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC in the Northern District of Georgia, with Catherine M. Salinas listed as Magistrate presiding and Angela Smith as Deputy Clerk. Much of the form is handwritten and garbled in the text, including the defendant's name, the plea and the bond figure, so no plea or bond outcome is stated. The typed portion is an Order Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act directing the government to adhere to its disclosure obligations under Brady and Giglio and to provide all materials and information that are arguably favorable to the defendant. It warns that failure to comply in a timely manner may result in serious consequences, including suppression or exclusion of evidence or dismissal of some or all counts.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Filed 08/11/23

Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC Document 18 Page 1 of 2

MAGISTRATE’S CRIMINAL MINUTES
ARRAIGNMENT

PLEA AND
SENTENCE

FTR

Filed in Open Court’ Date: #/1 l23 Tape: at 12°.SO TimeinCout 3 Smins

Magistrate (presiding): Catherine M. Salinas
Case Number: \°-23- CR- 2 dle

AUSA: Savah Klapman
Green erg,

USPO/PTR: Kelly

Deputy Clerk Angela Smith . a
Defendants Name. Austin Marin Siampwiai

Defendant's Attorney: Lynsey Sarvon

Type Counsel: ( ) Retained (“CJA ( )FPD ( ) Waived

ARREST DATE:

INTERPRETER

INITIAL APPEARANCE HEARING. (_ ) in THIS DISTRICT Dft. In Custody? ( ) Yes ( )No
Defendant advised of right to counsel. WAIVER OF COUNSEL filed.
ORDER appointing Federal Defender Program as counsel. () INITIAL APPEARANCE ONLY

___. ORDER appointing (State Bar of Ga. # ) as counsel.
___ ORDER giving defendant days to employ counsel. (cc: serv. by Mag)

_______ Dft. to pay attorney fees as follows:

____ INFORMATION/COMPLAINT filed. WAIVER ON INDICTMENT filed.

___Copy indictment/information given to dft? ( )Yes ( )No Read to dft? ( ) Yes ( )No.

____. CONSENT TO TRIAL BEFORE MAGISTRATE (MISD/PETTY) offense filed.

____. ARRAIGNMENT HELD. (_ ) superseding indictment/information.

___ ARRAIGNMENT continued until at Request of ( )Gvt. (+) Dft.

Dit. fails to appear for arraignment. BENCH WARRANT ISSUED

Dft. enters PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. (_ ) Dft. stood mute plea of NOT GUILTY entered.
MOTION TO CHANGE PLEA, and order allowing same.
PLEA OF GUILTY/NOLO as to counts

Petition to enter plea of GUILTY/NOLO filed.
NEGOTIATED PLEA between Government and defendant filed.

ASSIGNED TO JUDGE for: ( ) trial( ) arraignment/sentence.
ASSIGNED TO MAGISTRATE for pretrial proceedings.
Estimated trial time: days ( )SHORT ( )MEDIUM ( )LONG

CONSENT TO PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION filed. Referred to USPO for PSI and continued until

at

for sentencing.

v

See other side.
Case 1:23-cr-00246-WMR-RDC Document18- Filed 08/11/23 Page 2 of 2

Austin Mardin Siampwiz _ Defendant

Government MOTION FOR DETENTION filed. Hearing set for at
Temporary commitment issued.

Defendant to remain on pretrial release under the terms and conditions set forth in the U. S District Court for the
District of
BOND/PRETRIAL DETENTION HEARING

vo BOND/PRETRIAL DETENTION hearing held.

___ MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF BOND hearing held.

_____ MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF BOND ( ) GRANTED (_ ) DENIED
_____ WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW.

_/ GOVERNMENT MOTION FOR DETENTION ( ) GRANTED (“DENIED
___ WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW.

_% BOND SETATS_ $0,000.00

a Non-surety

____ Surety ( )Cash ( ) Property ( ) Corporate surety ONLY
____ SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

v4 Bond Filed: defendant released.
Bond NOT EXECUTED defendant to remain in Marshal’s custody.

SENTENCE :

Order

Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(f), the government is directed to adhere to
the disclosure obligations set forth in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to provide all materials
and information that are arguably favorable to the defendant in compliance with its obligations under Brady; Giglio
v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); and their progeny. Exculpatory material as defined in Brady and Kyles v.
Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 434 (1995), shall be provided sufficiently in advance of trial to allow a defendant to use it
effectively, and exculpatory information is not limited to information that would constitute admissible evidence.

The failure of the government to comply with its Brady obligations in a timely manner may result in serious
consequences, including, but not limited to, the suppression or exclusion of evidence, the dismissal of some or all
counts, adverse jury instructions, contempt proceedings, or other remedies that are just under the circumstances.

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.318618.18.0.pdf

Size

92,917 bytes

SHA-256

1c4eabdc4a2cf830d5c9a9c67d85204bdcb3ce02716d53579a81fd43729bb787

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.318618.18.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)