Proposed Reply Brief in Support of Government's Ex Parte Application; Exhibits — USA v. Ayvazyan et al. (Dkt. 99-2, C.D. Cal.)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW · Doc. 99-2 · 2020-12-21 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NICOLA T. HANNA 
United States Attorney 
BRANDON D. FOX 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Chief, Criminal Division 
JULIAN L. ANDRÉ (Cal. Bar No. 251120) 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Major Frauds Section 
1100 United States Courthouse 
312 North Spring Street 
Los Angeles, California 90012 
Telephone: (213) 894-6683 
Facsimile: (213) 894-6269 
E-mail: 
Julian.L.Andre@usdoj.gov 
DANIEL A. KAHN 
Acting Chief, Fraud Section 
Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice 
CHRISTOPHER FENTON 
Trial Attorney, Fraud Section 
Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice 
1400 New York Avenue NW, 3rd Floor 
Washington, DC 20530 
Telephone: (202) 302-0539 
Facsimile: (202) 514-0152 
E-mail: 
Christopher.Fenton@usdoj.gov 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
 
 
v. 
RICHARD AYVAZYAN, 
aka “Richard Avazian” and 
    “Iuliia Zhadko,” 
MARIETTA TERABELIAN, 
  aka “Marietta Abelian” and
      “Viktoria Kauichko,” 
ARTUR AYVAZYAN, 
aka “Arthur Ayvazyan,” and 
TAMARA DADYAN, 
Defendants.
No. CR 20-579-SVW 
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 
ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR 
(1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND 
(2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE TIME 
PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; 
EXHIBITS
GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO 
FILE REPLY BRIEF FILED 
CONNCURRENTLY HEREWITH 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 1 of 36   Page ID
#:644

2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff the United States of America, by and through its 
counsel of record, the United States Attorney for the Central 
District of California, Assistant United States Attorney Julian L. 
André, and Department of Justice Trial Attorney Christopher Fenton, 
hereby submits its reply brief in support of its previously filed ex 
parte application for entry of an order: (1) continuing the trial 
date in this matter from January 12, 2021, to May 4, 2021; and 
(2) excluding time from the Speedy Trial Act calculation for 
excludable delay.
This reply brief responds to certain arguments that defendant 
RICHARD AYVAZYAN made in his opposition, specifically his arguments 
requesting that the Court set certain pretrial deadlines, including 
a discovery cutoff, months before a potential trial date in this 
matter.  This reply is based upon the attached memorandum of points 
and authorities, the attached exhibits, the files and records in 
this case, and such further evidence and argument as the Court may 
permit.
Dated: December 21, 2020 
Respectfully submitted, 
NICOLA T. HANNA 
United States Attorney 
BRANDON D. FOX 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Chief, Criminal Division 
      /s/ 
 
JULIAN L. ANDRÉ 
Assistant United States Attorney 
CHRISTOPHER FENTON 
Department of Justice Trial Attorney 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 2 of 36   Page ID
#:645

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 
Defendants RICHARD AYVAZYAN (“R. AYVAZYAN”), MARIETTA 
TERABELIAN, ARTUR AYVAZYAN (“A. AYVAYZAN”), and TAMARA DADYAN are 
charged with conspiring to personally benefit from the COVID-19 
pandemic by fraudulently obtaining millions of dollars in disaster 
relief funds through two federal loan programs.  Although trial in 
this matter was initially scheduled for January 12, 2021, all trials 
in this district are currently suspended due to the unprecedented 
surge of COVID-19 within this district.  And, unfortunately, the 
situation in Los Angeles County appears to be getting worse, not 
better, as the numbers of active COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, 
and deaths in Los Angeles County continue to set new daily records, 
and projections show further increases through the New Year.  See, 
e.g., L.A. County outlines wrenching moves to ration healthcare if 
COVID-19 hospital crisis worsens, L.A. Times, Dec. 19, 2020, 
available at https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-12-
19/los-angeles-county-coronavirus-hospitalization-surge-rationing.
For these reasons, the government has moved to continue the trial in 
this matter to May 4, 2021, by which point the government is hopeful 
that the Court will have determined it is safe for trials to resume. 
Defendant R. AYVAZYAN has objected to this continuance and is 
instead demanding to go to trial on either January 12, 2021, or 
February 12, 2021, in the middle of the ongoing pandemic.  (CR 96.)
The government will not address defendant R. AYVAZYAN’s objection to 
the continuance and the proposed Speedy Trial Act findings, other 
than to say that defendant’s objections are meritless and ignore the 
unfortunate realities facing the district during this unprecedented 
public health crisis.  As set forth in the government’s ex parte 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 3 of 36   Page ID
#:646

2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
application and the Court’s General Orders, there is ample factual 
and legal basis for the Court to both grant the requested 
continuance and issue the requested findings as to excludable time. 
And defendants, all of whom are released on bond, have not 
demonstrated that they would suffer any actual prejudice by the 
requested continuance.
In his opposition to the government’s ex parte application, 
defendant R. AYVAZYAN has also arbitrarily requested that the Court 
set a discovery-cutoff deadline for December 22, 2020 (i.e., 24 
hours from the filings of this brief), require the government to 
immediately disclose its exhibit and witness lists, and then exclude 
evidence if the government fails to comply with these new pretrial 
deadlines.  (CR 96 at 6-11.)  Defendant’s request that the Court 
impose arbitrary and self-serving pretrial deadlines months before 
any trial in this case will proceed is meritless.  And defendant’s 
accusation that the government is seeking to use COVID-19 to gain a 
“windfall” or “secure a tactical advantage” (CR 96 at 2, 9, 10) is 
baseless and offensive, particularly in light of the charges in this 
case.1  The government is trying to reasonably manage the risks posed 
by the pandemic, not profit from them.
Defendant’s request should be rejected for the following five 
reasons.
1 Among other things, defendant R. AYVAZYAN and his wife, 
defendant TERABELIAN, are currently living in $3.25 million home 
which they purchased using COVID-19 disaster relief funds earmarked 
to save small businesses that would otherwise be forced to lay off 
their employees due to the pandemic.  (See CR 32, Overt Acts 9, 17, 
26, 29 (detailing transfers to Escrow Company 1 to purchase 
Residential Property 1).)
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 4 of 36   Page ID
#:647

3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
First, the government has worked diligently to produce 
discovery to the defendants in a timely manner and is continuing to 
do so.  Defendant R. AYVAZYAN’s claim to the contrary is false.
Defendant R. AYVAZYAN made his initial appearance in this 
district and was arraigned on December 4, 2020 -- just over two 
weeks ago.  In anticipation of the defendants’ arraignments, the 
government attempted to reach an agreement with counsel for the 
defendants regarding an appropriate protective order so that it 
could immediately begin producing discovery.  (CR 65.)  Once it was 
clear that no such agreement would be reached, the government 
promptly sought relief from this Court.  (Id.)  Although defendant 
R. AYVAZYAN disagreed with the government’s position regarding a 
protective order (CR 63) and this Court ultimately ruled in the 
defendants’ favor (CR 90), the government was acting in good faith 
and consistent with its obligations when it sought to protect the 
privacy of third-parties and the public in general.  Indeed, the 
protections sought in the government’s proposed protective order 
were consistent with those imposed by the Court in other cases and 
the defendants’ pretrial release conditions.  (See CR 65.)
More importantly, once the Court resolved the parties’ dispute 
and issued the Protective Order in this case on December 14, 2020, 
(CR 92), the government immediately began producing the discovery in 
to defendants, as it had always planned to do so (See CR 63, Exs. E, 
G).  Specifically, to date, the government has made the following 
three discovery productions totaling 16,827 pages of written 
materials or other electronic files: 
x On December 14, 2020, the government produced 3,834 pages of 
discovery, including loan applications, bank records, 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 5 of 36   Page ID
#:648

4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
California Employment Development Division records, the 
applicable search warrant applications and affidavits, 
defendants’ criminal history reports, law enforcement 
reports, surveillance photos, and summaries of named-victim 
M.Z.’s witness interviews.2
x On December 17, 2020, the government produced an additional 
12,937 pages of written materials and other electronic files, 
including additional loan applications, bank records, escrow 
records relating to the purchase of the properties identified 
in the indictment, records relating to defendant 
R. AYVAYZAN’s use of disaster relief funds to purchase luxury 
watches, toll records, and internet service provider 
subscriber records. 
x On December 18, 2020, the government produced jail call 
recordings involving the defendants, and correspondence from 
the IRS indicating that the various entities identified in 
the indictment had not filed IRS Forms 940 and 941 during the 
relevant time periods as defendants had claimed in the loan 
applications.
(See Ex. 1-3.)  Each discovery production also included a detailed 
index.  (Id.) 
 
Additionally, on December 10, 2020 (i.e., before this Court had 
entered a protective order), the government contacted defendants’ 
counsel to: (1) arrange for defense counsel to inspect at the FBI’s 
offices the physical evidence seized during the execution of seven 
2  The government voluntarily produced this witness interview 
summary in advance of its obligation to do so under the Jencks Act.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 6 of 36   Page ID
#:649

5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
search warrants; and (2) arrange to provide defendants with complete 
copies of any accessible digital devices that had been seized.  (Ex. 
4.)  On December 17, 2020, counsel for defendants R. AYVAZYAN and 
TERABELIAN and two support staff members spent approximately six-
and-a-half hours at the FBI’s offices reviewing and copying 
approximately 30 containers of physical and documentary evidence 
that had been seized.  The government will also be producing to 
defendant complete copies of seven digital devices today, December 
21, 2020, and will produce copies of the remaining digital devices 
on a rolling basis as soon as the devices are forensically imaged 
and copied onto an external hard-drive for the defense.3
Thus, at the time of this filing, the government has already 
produced to defendants a substantial amount of the relevant evidence 
relating to the current charges.  The government, however, is still 
working to process and produce additional discovery materials, 
including additional business records, law enforcement reports, 
witness summaries, and digital devices.  The government is working 
diligently to produce these materials as soon as possible.  There 
are nevertheless some labor-intensive aspects of the discovery 
process and the government is operating with limited resources due 
to the ongoing impact of COVID-19.  For example, seized digital 
devices need to be forensically imaged by the FBI’s CART Team and 
then copied to an external hard-drive before they can be produced to 
the defense.  And documentary evidence needs to be organized, 
processed or scanned, transferred from the case agents to the 
3  Defendants will likely receive access to most of these 
digital devices before the devices are reviewed by the government.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 7 of 36   Page ID
#:650

6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Department of Justice or U.S. Attorney’s Office, loaded into a 
discovery review platform, Bates-labeled, indexed, and exported for 
production, before it can be produced to defendants.  Restrictions 
imposed to protect the health and safety of the FBI agents and other 
government employees limits the number of individuals who may come 
into the office on a given day to perform these tasks.
Second, defendant R. AYVAZYAN’s request that the Court set an 
arbitrary December 22, 2020, discovery cut-off deadline is a 
transparent attempt to have this Court prospectively exclude 
otherwise admissible government evidence.  Defendant R. AYVAZYAN has 
not and cannot demonstrate any legitimate basis for the Court to 
take such action at this time.  Nor has he demonstrated that he has 
or will suffer any actual prejudice if he does not receive 
additional discovery by December 22, 2020.4  If defendants believe 
that certain evidence was not produced in a timely manner and should 
be excluded on that basis, defendants should file a properly noticed 
motion and seek to exclude that specific evidence at trial.  The 
Court can then address those evidentiary issues at that time.
Third, defendant R. AYVAZYAN asks the Court to sanction the 
government for circumstances that are out of the government’s 
control.  The decision to suspend trials in this district was made 
4  The government’s investigation is ongoing.  There is no basis 
for the Court to preclude the government from investigating 
additional crimes that may have been committed by the defendants or 
other coconspirators.  See, e.g., Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 
(1972); In re Grand Jury Proceedings (“Pressman”), 586 F.2d 724, 
(9th Cir. 1978).  Indeed, the government has an affirmative 
obligation to do so.  If the Court has any questions regarding the 
government’s ongoing investigation, the government would request 
permission to submit such information in camera and under seal so as 
not to jeopardize the investigation.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 8 of 36   Page ID
#:651

7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
by the Court in light of the health and safety concerns arising from 
COVID-19, not by the United States Attorney’s Office.  The 
government has no control over when trials in the district will be 
able to resume, but will be prepared to proceed to trial whenever 
the Court determines it is safe to hold trials in this district.
Fourth, defendant R. AYVAZYAN’s reliance on The Honorable John 
F. Walter’s ruling in United States v. Cai, No. CR 19-671-JFW (C.D. 
Cal.) is misplaced.  The charges in Cai were filed in December 2019, 
and the defendant was arraigned just a few days later.  Indictment, 
Cai, Dkt. No. 1 (Dec. 17, 2019); Minutes, Cai, Dkt. No. 15 (Dec. 19, 
2019).  After the parties stipulated to continue the trial date from 
February 2020 to August 25, 2020, the Court issued an Amended 
Criminal Trial Order containing very specific deadlines for the 
parties to disclose its trial exhibits and witness lists, and to 
file pretrial motions.  Amended Criminal Trial Order, Cai, Dkt. Nos. 
36 (Feb. 4, 2020).  As of August 12, 2020, when Judge Walter 
declined to extend the preexisting pretrial deadlines in advance of 
the August 25, 2020, trial date, the government and the defense had 
both been actively preparing for trial for months.   Criminal 
Minutes, Cai, Dkt. No. 143 (Aug. 12, 2020).  In fact, many of the 
relevant pretrial deadlines in Cai had passed; the parties had 
already exchanged pretrial exhibit lists and defendant had filed his 
motions in limine.  (CR 98, Ex. A at 17-18.)  Thus, one of Judge 
Walter’s purposes in maintaining the preexisting deadlines was to 
“eliminate, to the extent possible, certain of the issues that will 
make the trial go more smoothly.”  (CR 98, Ex. A at 24-25.)
This case stands in stark contrast to Cai.  Whereas the charges 
in Cai had already been pending for eight months, defendant 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 9 of 36   Page ID
#:652

8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
R. AYVAZYAN made his initial appearance in this district and was 
arraigned just over two weeks ago.  And, unlike in Cai, there are no 
existing pretrial deadlines in this case to continue.  The Court has 
not set any pretrial deadlines; nor has the government agreed to any 
such deadlines.5  Rather, defendant is requesting that the Court 
impose entirely new pretrial deadlines tied to a January 12, 2021, 
trial date, and then sanction the government for failing to comply 
with those deadlines.  Whereas in Cai, the government had months to 
complete the production of discovery and prepare its pretrial 
filings, defendant proposes that the Court provide the government 24 
hours –- until December 22, 2020 -- despite the fact that trial is 
unlikely to commence for months.  This is not what happened in Cai 
and it should not happen here.
Fifth, the actions of defendant R. AYVAZYAN’s codefendants in 
this case call into question the sincerity of the four defendants’ 
purported desire to proceed to trial on January 12, 2021.  Defendant 
A. AYVAZYAN did not retain counsel until December 8, 2020 (see CR 
60; CR 66; CR 72), and did not even request that the government 
produce discovery until December 14, 2020 (Ex. 5).  Indeed, the 
government had to affirmatively contact defendant A. AYVAZYAN’s 
counsel to confirm that they were requesting discovery under Rule 
16.  (Ex. 5.)  And, just last week, defendant DADYAN’s counsel 
sought the government’s position as to whether it would oppose 
5 The only case deadline currently in place is the Court’s 
standing requirement that the government provide the Court with 
three copies of its exhibit and witness list on the first day of 
trial, and that the parties submit proposed substantive jury 
instructions seven days prior to trial. 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 10 of 36   Page ID
#:653

9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
defendant DADYAN’s forthcoming request to travel to Aspen, Colorado 
from December 30, 2020, through January 4, 2021.  (Ex. 6.)
In sum, although defendants are within their rights to oppose 
the continuance of the trial date in this matter, the fact remains 
that this case will not and cannot proceed to trial on January 12, 
2021.  There is therefore no basis for the Court to impose pretrial 
deadlines that correspond to a trial date that will not take place, 
let alone for the Court to prospectively exclude government evidence 
based on a purported failure to comply with newly imposed deadlines.
Once the Court has selected a new trial date, the parties can meet-
and-confer regarding reasonable pretrial deadlines, including 
deadlines for the exchange of exhibit lists, witness lists, and the 
filing of pretrial motions.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 11 of 36   Page ID
#:654

United States v. Ayvazyan et al.,
No. CR 20-579-SVW 
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION 
FOR (1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND (2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE 
TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
EXHIBIT 1 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 12 of 36   Page ID
#:655

United States Department of Justice
United States Attorney’s Office
Central District of California
Julian L. André
Phone: (213) 894-6683
E-mail: Julian.L.Andre@usdoj.gov
1100 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
BY FEDEX & EMAIL
December 14, 2020
Ashwin J. Ram
Michael A. Keough
Nicholas P. Silverman
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Counsel for Richard Ayvazyan
David D. Diamond
Diamond and Associates
1200 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 406
Los Angeles, CA 90017
John Lewis Littrell
Bienert Katzman PC
903 Calle Amanecer Suite 350
San Clemente, CA 92673
Counsel for Marietta Terabelian
Thomas A. Mesereau, Jr.
Mesereau Law Group
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Jennifer J. Wirsching
Attorney at Law
1935 Alpha Road Suite 216
Glendale, CA 92108
Counsel for Artur Ayvazyan
Fred G. Minassian
Law Offices of Fred G. Minassian, Inc.
101 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1970
Glendale, CA 91203
Counsel for Tamara Dadyan
Re:
United States v. Ayvazyan et. al,
No. CR 2:20-cr-00579-SVW
Discovery Production Volume 1
Dear Counsel:
Pursuant to your clients’ requests for discovery and the protective order to be entered by the 
Court (see CR 90), enclosed please find an encrypted disc with discovery bearing Bates Numbers 
DOJ_PROD_0000000001 to DOJ_PROD_0000003834 and an attached index.1 These discovery 
materials are also being uploaded to Steptoe & Johnson’s file sharing system as you requested.
The government will continue to produce any additional discovery materials to which your 
clients are entitled on a rolling basis as they are processed and become available for production.  
1 The password to access the discovery materials will be emailed to you separately.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 13 of 36   Page ID
#:656

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 14 of 36   Page ID
#:657

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 15 of 36   Page ID
#:658

United States v. Ayvazyan et. al
No. CR 2:20-cr-00579-SVW
Discovery Production 1 – Volume 1
Index
 
TCF National Bank: Letter of No 
Records 
DOJ_PROD_0000000653 
DOJ_PROD_0000000655 
Wells Fargo Bank: Secureline
Realty and Funding, Inc. (Tamara 
Dadyan) PPP Application
DOJ_PROD_0000000656 
DOJ_PROD_0000000785 
Cross River Bank: Allstate Towing 
and Transport LLC
DOJ_PROD_0000000787 
DOJ_PROD_0000000832 
Cross River Bank: G&A 
Diamonds 
DOJ_PROD_0000000833 
DOJ_PROD_0000000877 
Newtek Small Business Finance:
Timeline Transport (Iuliia Zhadko)
DOJ_PROD_0000000878 
DOJ_PROD_0000000948 
Newtek Small Business Finance: 
TM Events (A
 K
)
DOJ_PROD_0000000949 
DOJ_PROD_0000001013 
Newtek Small Business Finance: 
Mod Interiors LLC 
DOJ_PROD_0000001014 
DOJ_PROD_0000001161 
Seattle Bank: Runyan Tax 
Services (Viktoria Kauichko)
DOJ_PROD_0000001162 
DOJ_PROD_0000001232 
SBA EIDL - All State Towing 
8101 (Artur Ayvazyan)
DOJ_PROD_0000001233 
DOJ_PROD_0000001306 
SBA EIDL - Fadehaus Barbershop 
#
7904
DOJ_PROD_0000001307 
DOJ_PROD_0000001377 
SBA EIDL - Fiber One 
#
79-00
DOJ_PROD_0000001378 
DOJ_PROD_0000001448 
SBA EIDL - Fiber One Media 
#
79-00
DOJ_PROD_0000001449 
DOJ_PROD_0000001522 
SBA EIDL - G&A Diamonds 
#
7909
DOJ_PROD_0000001523 
DOJ_PROD_0000001595 
SBA EIDL - Journeymen 
Construction #
74-09
DOJ_PROD_0000001596 
DOJ_PROD_0000001650 
SBA EIDL - Nelson's Nursery 
#
7903
DOJ_PROD_0000001651 
DOJ_PROD_0000001721 
SBA EIDL - Redline Auto 
Collision #
7801
DOJ_PROD_0000001722 
DOJ_PROD_0000001785 
SBA EIDL - Redline Auto 
Mechanics #
8009
DOJ_PROD_0000001786 
DOJ_PROD_0000001857 
SBA EIDL - TM Events -
#
08102
DOJ_PROD_0000001858 
DOJ_PROD_0000001930 
SBA EIDL - Top Quality 
Contracting #
7402
DOJ_PROD_0000001931 
DOJ_PROD_0000002000 
Selected Photographs from Digital 
Devices Seized Incident to Arrests 
of R. AYVAZYAN and 
TERABELIAN
DOJ_PROD_0000002001 
DOJ_PROD_0000002056 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 16 of 36   Page ID
#:659

United States v. Ayvazyan et. al
No. CR 2:20-cr-00579-SVW
Discovery Production 1 – Volume 1
Index
 
Criminal History Report: Arthur 
Ayvazyan
DOJ_PROD_0000002057 
DOJ_PROD_0000002134 
Criminal History Report: Richard 
Ayvazyan
DOJ_PROD_0000002135 
DOJ_PROD_0000002193 
Criminal History Report: Tamara 
Dadyan
DOJ_PROD_0000002194 
DOJ_PROD_0000002294 
Criminal History Report: Victoria 
Kauichko
DOJ_PROD_0000002295 
DOJ_PROD_0000002329 
Criminal History Report: Marietta 
Terabelian
DOJ_PROD_0000002330 
DOJ_PROD_0000002338 
CBP Reports - 10.19.2020 
Secondary Inspection in Miami 
DOJ_PROD_0000002339 
DOJ_PROD_0000002358 
SBA Loan #
7903 - Time 
Line Transport 
DOJ_PROD_0000002359 
DOJ_PROD_0000002429 
SBA App #
2057 - Top 
Quality Construction - TCF 
National Bank 
DOJ_PROD_0000002430 
DOJ_PROD_0000002439 
SBA App #
1035 - Time Line 
Transport - Radius Bank 
DOJ_PROD_0000002440 
DOJ_PROD_0000002449 
SBA Loan #
7202 - Top 
Quality Construction - Customers 
Bank 
DOJ_PROD_0000002450 
DOJ_PROD_0000002457 
SBA Loan #
7406 - Time 
Line Transport - Celtic 
DOJ_PROD_0000002458 
DOJ_PROD_0000002465 
SBA Loan #
7706 - Top 
Quality Contractors 
DOJ_PROD_0000002466 
DOJ_PROD_0000002473 
SBA Loan #
7304 - Mark 
Zindroski dba Top Quality 
Construction - Celtic 
DOJ_PROD_0000002474 
DOJ_PROD_0000002481 
SBA Loan - ReadyCap Lending -
Top Quality Contracting - SBA
#
7202
DOJ_PROD_0000002482 
DOJ_PROD_0000002546 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05282
DOJ_PROD_0000002552 
DOJ_PROD_0000002640 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05284
DOJ_PROD_0000002641 
DOJ_PROD_0000002729 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05285
DOJ_PROD_0000002730 
DOJ_PROD_0000002818 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05286
DOJ_PROD_0000002819 
DOJ_PROD_0000002909 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05288
DOJ_PROD_0000002910 
DOJ_PROD_0000003000 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05289
DOJ_PROD_0000003001 
DOJ_PROD_0000003091 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 17 of 36   Page ID
#:660

United States v. Ayvazyan et. al
No. CR 2:20-cr-00579-SVW
Discovery Production 1 – Volume 1
Index
 
 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05290
DOJ_PROD_0000003092 
DOJ_PROD_0000003182 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05292
DOJ_PROD_0000003183 
DOJ_PROD_0000003269 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05293
DOJ_PROD_0000003270 
DOJ_PROD_0000003356 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05294
DOJ_PROD_0000003357 
DOJ_PROD_0000003443 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2-20-MJ-05296
DOJ_PROD_0000003444 
DOJ_PROD_0000003530 
Search Warrant Application and 
Affidavit: 2:20-MJ-05484
DOJ_PROD_0000003531 
DOJ_PROD_0000003663 
Surveillance Photos - Richard 
Ayvazyan 
DOJ_PROD_0000003664 
DOJ_PROD_0000003673 
Surveillance Photos - Trash 
Covers 
DOJ_PROD_0000003674 
DOJ_PROD_0000003752 
Surveillance Garbage Pick Up 
2020.10.22
DOJ_PROD_0000003753 
DOJ_PROD_0000003771 
2020.07.21 M
Z
Interview Memo
DOJ_PROD_0000003772 
DOJ_PROD_0000003773 
2020.08.04 M
Z
 Interview Memo and 
Attachments
DOJ_PROD_0000003774 
DOJ_PROD_0000003801 
US Bank: Arthur Ayvazyan and 
Allstate Towing 
DOJ_PROD_0000003802 
DOJ_PROD_0000003834 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 18 of 36   Page ID
#:661

United States v. Ayvazyan et al.,
No. CR 20-579-SVW 
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION 
FOR (1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND (2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE 
TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
EXHIBIT 2 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 19 of 36   Page ID
#:662

United States Department of Justice
United States Attorney’s Office
Central District of California
Julian L. André
Phone: (213) 894-6683
E-mail: Julian.L.Andre@usdoj.gov
1100 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
BY FEDEX & EMAIL
December 17, 2020
Ashwin J. Ram
Michael A. Keough
Nicholas P. Silverman
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Counsel for Richard Ayvazyan
David D. Diamond
Diamond and Associates
1200 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 406
Los Angeles, CA 90017
John Lewis Littrell
Bienert Katzman PC
903 Calle Amanecer Suite 350
San Clemente, CA 92673
Counsel for Marietta Terabelian
Thomas A. Mesereau, Jr.
Mesereau Law Group
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Jennifer J. Wirsching
Attorney at Law
1935 Alpha Road Suite 216
Glendale, CA 92108
Counsel for Artur Ayvazyan
Fred G. Minassian
Law Offices of Fred G. Minassian, Inc.
101 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1970
Glendale, CA 91203
Counsel for Tamara Dadyan
Re:
United States v. Ayvazyan et. al,
No. CR 2:20-cr-00579-SVW
Discovery Production Volume 2
Dear Counsel:
Pursuant to your clients’ requests for discovery and the Court’s protective order (see CR 92),
enclosed please find an encrypted flash drive with discovery bearing Bates Numbers 
DOJ_PROD_0000003835 to DOJ_PROD_0000016802 and an attached index.1 These discovery 
materials are also being uploaded to Steptoe & Johnson’s file sharing system as you requested.
The government will continue to produce any additional discovery materials to which your 
clients are entitled on a rolling basis as they are processed and become available for production.  
1 The password to access the discovery materials will be emailed to you separately.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 20 of 36   Page ID
#:663

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 21 of 36   Page ID
#:664

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 22 of 36   Page ID
#:665

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 23 of 36   Page ID
#:666

United States v. Ayvazyan et al.,
No. CR 20-579-SVW 
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION 
FOR (1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND (2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE 
TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
EXHIBIT 3 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 24 of 36   Page ID
#:667

United States Department of Justice
United States Attorney’s Office
Central District of California
Julian L. André
Phone: (213) 894-6683
E-mail: Julian.L.Andre@usdoj.gov
1100 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
BY FEDEX & EMAIL
December 18, 2020
Ashwin J. Ram
Michael A. Keough
Nicholas P. Silverman
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Counsel for Richard Ayvazyan
David D. Diamond
Diamond and Associates
1200 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 406
Los Angeles, CA 90017
John Lewis Littrell
Bienert Katzman PC
903 Calle Amanecer Suite 350
San Clemente, CA 92673
Counsel for Marietta Terabelian
Thomas A. Mesereau, Jr.
Mesereau Law Group
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Jennifer J. Wirsching
Attorney at Law
1935 Alpha Road Suite 216
Glendale, CA 92108
Counsel for Artur Ayvazyan
Fred G. Minassian
Law Offices of Fred G. Minassian, Inc.
101 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 1970
Glendale, CA 91203
Counsel for Tamara Dadyan
Re:
United States v. Ayvazyan et. al,
No. CR 2:20-cr-00579-SVW
Discovery Production Volume 3
Dear Counsel:
Pursuant to your clients’ requests for discovery and the Court’s protective order (see CR 92),
enclosed please find an zip file with discovery bearing Bates Numbers DOJ_PROD_0000016803
to DOJ_PROD_0000016827 and an attached index.1 These discovery materials are also being 
uploaded to Steptoe & Johnson’s file sharing system as you requested. The government will 
continue to produce any additional discovery materials to which your clients are entitled on a 
rolling basis as they are processed and become available for production.  
1 The password to access the discovery materials will be emailed to you separately.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 25 of 36   Page ID
#:668

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 26 of 36   Page ID
#:669

Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 27 of 36   Page ID
#:670

United States v. Ayvazyan et al.,
No. CR 20-579-SVW 
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION 
FOR (1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND (2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE 
TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
EXHIBIT 4 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 28 of 36   Page ID
#:671


8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRI-XVWLFH

8QLWHG6WDWHV$WWRUQH\¶V2IILFH
&HQWUDO'LVWULFWRI&DOLIRUQLD

Julian L. André 
Phone: (213) 894-6683 
E-mail: Julian.L.Andre@usdoj.gov 
1100 United States Courthouse 
312 North Spring Street 
Los Angeles, California  90012 

'HFHPEHU
9,$(0$,/
$VKZLQ-5DP
0LFKDHO$.HRXJK
1LFKRODV36LOYHUPDQ
6WHSWRH	-RKQVRQ//3
:HVW)LIWK6WUHHW6XLWH
/RV$QJHOHV&$

'DYLG''LDPRQG
'LDPRQGDQG$VVRFLDWHV
:LOVKLUH%RXOHYDUG6XLWH
/RV$QJHOHV&$

-RKQ/HZLV/LWWUHOO
%LHQHUW.DW]PDQ3&
&DOOH$PDQHFHU6XLWH
6DQ&OHPHQWH&$
7KRPDV$0HVHUHDX-U
0HVHUHDX/DZ*URXS
6DQWD0RQLFD%RXOHYDUG6XLWH
/RV$QJHOHV&$

-HQQLIHU-:LUVFKLQJ
$WWRUQH\DW/DZ
$OSKD5RDG6XLWH
*OHQGDOH&$

)UHG*0LQDVVLDQ
/DZ2IILFHVRI)UHG*0LQDVVLDQ,QF
1%UDQG%OYG6XLWH
*OHQGDOH&$



5H
8QLWHG6WDWHVY$\YD]\DQHWDO
1R&569:
'HDU&RXQVHO
:HZULWHUHJDUGLQJGLVFRYHU\LQ8QLWHG6WDWHVY$\YD]\DQHWDO1R&569:$V\RX
DUHOLNHO\DZDUHWKHJRYHUQPHQWH[HFXWHGDQXPEHURIVHDUFKZDUUDQWVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKLWV
LQYHVWLJDWLRQSXUVXDQWWRZKLFKLWVHL]HGSK\VLFDOHYLGHQFHDQGDQXPEHURIGLJLWDOGHYLFHV:H
ZULWHWRDUUDQJHIRUWKHVHPDWHULDOVWREHPDGHDYDLODEOHWR\RXIRU\RXULQVSHFWLRQDQGUHYLHZDV
VRRQDVSUDFWLFDEOH

3K\VLFDO(YLGHQFH

'XULQJWKHH[HFXWLRQRIVHDUFKZDUUDQWVLQWKLVFDVHWKHJRYHUQPHQWVHL]HGDVLJQLILFDQWDPRXQW
RISK\VLFDOHYLGHQFH7KHYDVWPDMRULW\RIWKHSK\VLFDOHYLGHQFHFRQVLVWVRIGRFXPHQWVDQG
RWKHUSDSHUUHFRUGV'XHWRWKHYROXPHRIWKHGRFXPHQWDU\HYLGHQFHVHL]HGWKH)%,ZLOO
WUDQVSRUWWKLVSK\VLFDOHYLGHQFHWRDQRWKHU)%,IDFLOLW\WREHVFDQQHGDQGSKRWRJUDSKHGVRWKDW
HOHFWURQLFFRSLHVFDQWKHQEHSURGXFHGWR\RXLQGLVFRYHU\'XULQJWKHVFDQQLQJDQG
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 29 of 36   Page ID
#:672

&RXQVHOIRU'HIHQGDQWV
5(8QLWHG6WDWHVY$\YD]\DQ1R&569:
'HFHPEHU
3DJH



SKRWRJUDSKLQJSURFHVVWKHSK\VLFDOHYLGHQFHZLOOEHXQDYDLODEOHIRUWKHGHIHQVHWRUHYLHZ7KLV
SURFHVVPD\WDNHDWOHDVWDIHZZHHNV

)RUWKDWUHDVRQEHIRUHWKH)%,VHQGVWKHGRFXPHQWDU\HYLGHQFHRXWWREHVFDQQHGDQG
SKRWRJUDSKHGIRUGLVFRYHU\SXUSRVHVZHZRXOGOLNHWRPDNHLWDYDLODEOHWR\RXIRU\RXU
LQVSHFWLRQDQGUHYLHZDWWKH)%,¶VRIILFHLQ/RV$QJHOHV&DOLIRUQLD3OHDVHOHWXVNQRZDVVRRQ
DVSRVVLEOHEXWQRODWHUWKDQWKHSPRQ0RQGD\'HFHPEHUZKHWKHU\RXZRXOGOLNHWR
FRPHYLHZWKHSK\VLFDOHYLGHQFHDW)%,¶VRIILFHVQH[WZHHNVRZHFDQPDNHWKHQHFHVVDU\
DUUDQJHPHQWV

3OHDVHQRWHWKDWGXHWRFXUUHQWKHDOWKDQGVDIHW\SUHFDXWLRQVUHJDUGLQJ&29,'KRZHYHUWKDW
WKH)%,ZLOOOLNHO\RQO\EHDFFRPPRGDWHRQHODZ\HURQEHKDOIHDFKRIGHIHQGDQW,IQRQHRIWKH
FRXQVHOIRUWKHGHIHQGDQWVDUHLQWHUHVWHGLQUHYLHZLQJWKHSK\VLFDOHYLGHQFHDWWKH)%,¶VRIILFHV
DWWKLVWLPHZHZLOOLPPHGLDWHO\SURFHHGWRKDYHWKHSK\VLFDOHYLGHQFHVFDQQHGDQG
SKRWRJUDSKHG

'LJLWDO'HYLFHV

'XULQJWKHH[HFXWLRQRIVHDUFKZDUUDQWVWKHJRYHUQPHQWDOVRVHL]HGDQXPEHURIGLJLWDOGHYLFHV
7KHJRYHUQPHQWSURSRVHVWRSURGXFHWRDOOIRXUGHIHQGDQWVFRPSOHWHIRUHQVLFFRSLHVRIDQ\
DFFHVVLEOHGLJLWDOGHYLFHVWKDWZHUHVHL]HGIURPWKHIRXUGHIHQGDQWVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKLV
LQYHVWLJDWLRQ)RUH[DPSOHWKHJRYHUQPHQWSURSRVHVWKDWIRUHQVLFFRSLHVRIWKHGLJLWDOGHYLFHV
VHL]HGIURPGHIHQGDQW5LFKDUG$\YD]\DQEHSURGXFHGWRDOOIRXUGHIHQGDQWVDQGIRUHQVLFFRSLHV
RIWKHGLJLWDOGHYLFHVVHL]HGIURPGHIHQGDQW7DPDUD'DG\DQ¶VUHVLGHQFHEHSURGXFHGWRDOOIRXU
GHIHQGDQWV,I\RXKDYHDQREMHFWLRQWRWKHJRYHUQPHQW¶VSURSRVDOSOHDVHOHWXVNQRZ
LPPHGLDWHO\VRWKDWZHFDQFRQIHUDVVRRQDVSRVVLEOH

7KH)%,LVGLOLJHQWO\ZRUNLQJWRLPDJHDQGSURFHVVWKHVHGLJLWDOGHYLFHVVRWKDWWKHGLJLWDO
HYLGHQFHFDQWKHQEHSURGXFHGWRWKHGHIHQVHRQDUROOLQJEDVLV,QRUGHUWRH[SHGLWHWKLV
SURFHVVZHUHTXHVW\RXSURYLGHWKHJRYHUQPHQWZLWKDWOHDVWRQH7%H[WHUQDOKDUGGULYHWKDW
WKH)%,FDQXVHWRORDGWKHGLJLWDOGDWD3OHDVHKDYHWKHH[WHUQDOKDUGGULYHPDLOHGWR)%,
6SHFLDO$JHQW-XVWLQ3DOPHUWRQDWWKHIROORZLQJDGGUHVV

-XVWLQ3DOPHUWRQ6SHFLDO$JHQW
)HGHUDO%XUHDXRI,QYHVWLJDWLRQ
:LOVKLUH%OYG6XLWH
/RV$QJHOHV&DOLIRUQLD


7KH)%,SUHIHUVWKDW\RXHDFKSURYLGHDQHZH[WHUQDOKDUGGULYHLQVHDOHGSDFNDJLQJ
DVWKLVFRXOGHOLPLQDWHWKHQHHGIRUWKH)%,WRZLSHWKHH[WHUQDOKDUGGULYHEHIRUHORDGLQJWKH
GDWDDSURFHVVZKLFKWDNHVDGGLWLRQDOWLPHDQGFRXOGFDXVHGHOD\
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 30 of 36   Page ID
#:673

&RXQVHOIRU'HIHQGDQWV
5(8QLWHG6WDWHVY$\YD]\DQ1R&569:
'HFHPEHU
3DJH



3OHDVHQRWHWKDWGXHWRDQXPEHURIIDFWRUVLQFOXGLQJFXUUHQWVWDIILQJOLPLWDWLRQVFDXVHGE\
&29,'LWPD\WDNHPRUHWLPHIRUWKH)%,WRSURFHVVDQGFRS\WKHGLJLWDOGHYLFHVWKDQXVXDO
$FFRUGLQJO\ZHSODQWRSURGXFHFRSLHVRIWKHGLJLWDOGHYLFHVWR\RXRQDUROOLQJEDVLVDVWKH
HYLGHQFHEHFRPHVDYDLODEOH$WWKLVWLPHZHKDYHDVNHGWKH)%,WRSULRULWL]HSURFHVVLQJWKH
GLJLWDOGHYLFHVVHL]HGLQFLGHQWWRWKHDUUHVWVRIGHIHQGDQWV5LFKDUG$\YD]\DQDQG0DULHWWD
7HUDEHOLDQLQ0LDPL)ORULGD,IWKHUHDUHRWKHUGLJLWDOGHYLFHV\RXZRXOGOLNHXVWRSULRULWL]H
SOHDVHOHWXVNQRZDQGZHZLOOGRRXUEHVWWRDFFRPPRGDWHWKRVHUHTXHVWV

3OHDVHOHWXVNQRZLI\RXZRXOGOLNHWRGLVFXVVWKHVHLVVXHVIXUWKHURUKDYHDQ\TXHVWLRQV

9HU\WUXO\\RXUV






$VVLVWDQW8QLWHG6WDWHV$WWRUQH\
0DMRU)UDXGV6HFWLRQ
FF
&KULVWRSKHU)HQWRQ7ULDO$WWRUQH\86'HSDUWPHQWRI-XVWLFH
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 31 of 36   Page ID
#:674

United States v. Ayvazyan et al.,
No. CR 20-579-SVW 
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION 
FOR (1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND (2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE 
TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
EXHIBIT 5 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 32 of 36   Page ID
#:675

From:
Jennifer Wirsching
To:
Andre, Julian L. (USACAC)
Cc:
mesereau@mesereaulaw.com; Fenton, Christopher (CRM)
Subject:
Re: US v. Ayvazyan
Date:
Monday, December 14, 2020 12:45:13 PM
Julian and Chris -
We are formally requesting Rule 16 discovery as requested by all other co-defendants in this
matter.
Thank you,
Jennifer
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Andre, Julian L. (USACAC)
<Julian.L.Andre@usdoj.gov> wrote:
Counsel:
 
We are preparing to send out the government’s first discovery production, but have yet
to receive a discovery request from your client, defendant Artur Ayvazyan.  Please
confirm that you are requesting discovery under Rule 16.  Thank you.
 
Julian
 
Julian L. André
Assistant United States Attorney
Major Frauds Section
United States Courthouse, Suite 1100
312 N. Spring St. | Los Angeles, California 90012
T: 213.894.6683 | julian.l.andre@usdoj.gov
 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 33 of 36   Page ID
#:676

United States v. Ayvazyan et al.,
No. CR 20-579-SVW 
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS EX PARTE APPLICATION 
FOR (1) CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND (2) FINDINGS OF EXCLUDABLE 
TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 
EXHIBIT 6 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 34 of 36   Page ID
#:677

From:
Andre, Julian L. (USACAC)
To:
Law offices of Fred G. Minassian, Inc.
Cc:
Fenton, Christopher (CRM)
Subject:
RE: US v. Ayvazyan et al., No. CR 20-579-SVW
Date:
Monday, December 14, 2020 4:37:00 PM
Fred:
 
Provided your client completes and files the required bond paperwork by the current December 28,
2020, deadline, the government takes no position regarding the request and would defer to the
Court.  The government does not believe your client should be permitted to travel unless and until
the bond paperwork (other than the certified deed) is complete and has been filed with the Court. 
 
Thank you.
 
Julian
 
Julian L. André
Assistant United States Attorney
Major Frauds Section
United States Courthouse, Suite 1100
312 N. Spring St. | Los Angeles, California 90012
T: 213.894.6683 | julian.l.andre@usdoj.gov
 
 
 
From: Law offices of Fred G. Minassian, Inc. <fgminassianlaw@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 12:00 PM
To: Andre, Julian L. (USACAC) <JAndre1@usa.doj.gov>
Subject: Re: US v. Ayvazyan et al., No. CR 20-579-SVW
Dear Julian,
Hope this email finds you well.
I was inquiring if you would have an objection for my client to travel to Aspen Colorado from
12/30 thru 1/4/21.
 Please be advised that these arrangements were made prior to her being indicted in the above
referenced case.
Further, pretrial services has no objection to said travel.
Best,
Fred
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Thursday, December 10, 2020, 4:45 PM, Andre, Julian L. (USACAC)
<Julian.L.Andre@usdoj.gov> wrote:
Counsel:
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 35 of 36   Page ID
#:678

Please see the attached correspondence. Thank you.
Julian L. André
Assistant United States Attorney
Major Frauds Section
United States Courthouse, Suite 1100
312 N. Spring St. | Los Angeles, California 90012
T: 213.894.6683 | julian.l.andre@usdoj.gov
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 99-2     Filed 12/21/20     Page 36 of 36   Page ID
#:679

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cacd.802533.99.2.pdf

Size

1,469,192 bytes

SHA-256

976b1ea039a03dde9cc83ae932dc193762eb8c3e5e8d38498db1324e03b2b50c

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cacd.802533.99.2.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)