Court filing
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS MANDATORY RULE 5(f) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar as to… — USA v. Ayvazyan et al (Dkt. 8)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2020-11-06 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-mj-05321-DUTY · Doc. 8 · 2020-11-06 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
Criminal minutes—general recording an in-chambers mandatory Rule 5(f) order made November 6, 2020 by United States Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar in USA v. Ayvazyan et al, Case No. 20-MJ-5321, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, docketed as Doc. 8 in No. 2:20-mj-05321-DUTY. In accordance with the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No. 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), the order directs the United States to produce exculpatory evidence to the defendants as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. It states that failing to do so in a timely manner may result in adverse consequences, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions. The minute form is one page.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL MINUTES —GENERAL Case No. 20-MJ-5321 Date: November 6, 2020 Present: The Honorable Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge Interpreter: NSA Donnamarie Luengo Julian Andre Deputy Clerk Court Reporter /Recorder Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S.A. v. Defendant(sl Present Cust Bond Attorney.(s) for Defendant(s): Present ~ Ret Authur Ayazyan Proceedings: X X Nadine Hettle, DFPD X X (IN CHAMBERS) MANDATORY RULE 5(~ ORDER In accordance with the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No. 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), the United States is ordered to produce exculpatory evidence to the Defendants) as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in adverse consequences, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions. CR-I1 (04/15) Criminal Minutes —General Page 1 of 1 Case 2:20-mj-05321-DUTY Document 8 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:34
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.800805.8.0.pdf
- Size
- 41,175 bytes
- SHA-256
- aeb6d963a58a1552996f2ad6059098d4bb4a4eb4d9b231f9eadc580cb4f99b61
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.cacd.800805.8.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)