Court filing
PROPOSED JURY VERDICT filed by Plaintiff USA as to Defendant Richard Ayvazyan,… — USA v. Ayvazyan et al (Dkt. 596)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-06-27 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW · Doc. 596 · 2021-06-27 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
The government's proposed forfeiture special verdict forms in United States v. Richard Ayvazyan et al., CR 2:20-579(A)-SVW, filed June 27, 2021 as Document 596 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The filing covers defendants Richard Ayvazyan, Marietta Terabelian, Artur Ayvazyan and Vahe Dadyan and is signed /s/ by Assistant United States Attorney Dan G. Boyle. Each form follows a guilty verdict on counts of the First Superseding Indictment and asks the jury whether a preponderance of the evidence shows that listed property constitutes or is derived from offense proceeds, or was involved in the offense in Count 26. Property listed for Richard Ayvazyan includes real property in Tarzana, Glendale and Palm Desert, $451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, wrist watches and sixty gold bullion coins.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD AYVAZYAN,
aka “Richard Avazian” and
“Iuliia Zhadko,”
MARIETTA TERABELIAN,
aka “Marietta Abelian”
and
“Viktoria Kauichko,”
ARTUR AYVAZYAN,
aka “Arthur Ayvazyan,”
and
TAMARA DADYAN,
MANUK GRIGORYAN,
aka “Mike Grigoryan,” and
“Anton Kudiumov,”
ARMAN HAYRAPETYAN,
EDVARD PARONYAN,
aka “Edvard Paronian” and
“Edward Paronyan,”
and
VAHE DADYAN,
Defendants.
CR 2:20-579(A)-SVW
GOVERNMENT’S PROPOSED FORFEITURE
SPECIAL VERDICT FORMS
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel
of record, the Acting United States Attorney for the Central District
of California, Assistant United States Attorneys Scott Paetty,
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 1 of 70 Page ID
#:7203
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Catherine Ahn, Brian Faerstein, Dan Boyle, and Department of Justice
Trial Attorney Christopher Fenton, hereby submits the government’s
proposed verdict form with respect to defendants Richard Ayvazyan,
Marietta Terabelian, Artur Ayvazyan, and Vahe Dadyan.
Dated: June 27, 2021
Respectfully submitted,
TRACY L. WILKISON
Acting United States Attorney
SCOTT M. GARRINGER
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
/s/
DAN G. BOYLE
CATHERINE AHN
SCOTT PAETTY
BRIAN FAERSTEIN
Assistant United States Attorneys
CHRISTOPHER FENTON
Department of Justice Trial Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 2 of 70 Page ID
#:7204
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD AYVAZYAN,
MARIETTA TERABELIAN,
ARTUR AYVAZYAN,
TAMARA DADYAN,
MANUK GRIGORYAN,
ARMAN HAYRAPETYAN,
EDVARD PARONYAN,
VAHE DADYAN,
Defendants.
CR 2:20-579(A)-SVW
FORFEITURE SPECIAL VERDICT FORM=
FOR DEFENDANT RICHARD AYVAZYAN
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 3 of 70 Page ID
#:7205
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
We, the jury in the above-captioned case, present the following
unanimous verdict as to defendant RICHARD AYVAZYAN:
COUNT ONE
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant RICHARD AYVAZYAN
on Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment (“FSI”), the
government seeks forfeiture of the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
1.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 2.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
2.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 4 of 70 Page ID
#:7206
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 3.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
3.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 4.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
4.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 5.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
5.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 5 of 70 Page ID
#:7207
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 6.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
6.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 7.
$3,422.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at Miami
International Airport
7.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 8.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 6 of 70 Page ID
#:7208
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
8.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 9.
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
9.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 10.
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
10.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 7 of 70 Page ID
#:7209
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 11.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
11.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 12.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
12.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 13.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
13.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 8 of 70 Page ID
#:7210
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 14.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
14.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 15.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
15.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 16.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
16.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 9 of 70 Page ID
#:7211
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 17.
COUNTS TWO THROUGH TWELVE, TWENTY-TWO, and TWENTY-FOUR
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant RICHARD AYVAZYAN
on Counts 2-12, 22, and 24 of the FSI, the government seeks
forfeiture of the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
17.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 18.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
18.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 19.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 10 of 70 Page ID
#:7212
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
19.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 20.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
20.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 21.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
21.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 11 of 70 Page ID
#:7213
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 22.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
22.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 23.
$3,422.00.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at the Miami
International Airport
23.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 24.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 12 of 70 Page ID
#:7214
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
24.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 25.
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
25.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 26.
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
26.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 13 of 70 Page ID
#:7215
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 27.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
27.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 28.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
28.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 29.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
29.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 14 of 70 Page ID
#:7216
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 30.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
30.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 31.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
31.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 32.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
32.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12, 22, and 24?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 15 of 70 Page ID
#:7217
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 33.
COUNTS THIRTEEN THROUGH TWENTY-ONE
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant RICHARD AYVAZYAN
on Counts 13-21 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the
following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
33.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 34.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
34.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 35.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 16 of 70 Page ID
#:7218
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
35.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 36.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
36.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 37.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
37.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 17 of 70 Page ID
#:7219
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 38.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
38.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 39.
$3,422.00.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at the Miami
International Airport
39.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 40.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 18 of 70 Page ID
#:7220
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
40.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 41.
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
41.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 42.
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
42.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 19 of 70 Page ID
#:7221
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 43.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
43.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 44.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
44.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 45.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
45.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 20 of 70 Page ID
#:7222
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 46.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
46.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 47.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
47.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 48.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
48.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-21?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 21 of 70 Page ID
#:7223
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 49.
COUNT TWENTY-SIX
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant RICHARD AYVAZYAN
on Count 26 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the
following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
49.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 50.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
50.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 51.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
51.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 22 of 70 Page ID
#:7224
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 52.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
52.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 53.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
53.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 54.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
54.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 23 of 70 Page ID
#:7225
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 55.
$3,422.00.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at the Miami
International Airport
55.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 56.
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
56.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 57
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
57.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 58.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 24 of 70 Page ID
#:7226
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
58.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 59.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
59.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 60.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
60.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 61.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
61.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 25 of 70 Page ID
#:7227
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 62.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
62.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 63.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
63.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 64.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
64.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
____________________
______________________________
DATED
FOREPERSON
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 26 of 70 Page ID
#:7228
27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 27 of 70 Page ID
#:7229
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD AYVAZYAN,
MARIETTA TERABELIAN,
ARTUR AYVAZYAN,
TAMARA DADYAN,
MANUK GRIGORYAN,
ARMAN HAYRAPETYAN,
EDVARD PARONYAN,
VAHE DADYAN,
Defendants.
CR 2:20-579(A)-SVW
FORFEITURE SPECIAL VERDICT FORM=
FOR DEFENDANT ARTUR AYVAZYAN
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 28 of 70 Page ID
#:7230
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
We, the jury in the above-captioned case, present the following
unanimous verdict as to defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN:
COUNT ONE
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on
Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment (“FSI”), the government
seeks forfeiture of the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
1.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 2.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
2.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 3.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 29 of 70 Page ID
#:7231
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
3.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 4.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
4.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 5.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
5.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 30 of 70 Page ID
#:7232
31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 6.
$12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur
Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan
6.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 7.
COUNTS TWO THROUGH TWELVE and TWENTY-FOUR
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on
Counts 2-12 and 24 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the
following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
7.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12 and 24?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 31 of 70 Page ID
#:7233
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 8.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
8.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12 and 22?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 9.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
9.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12 and 22?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 10.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 32 of 70 Page ID
#:7234
33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12 and 22?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 11.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
11.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12 and 22?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 12.
$12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur
Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan
12.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12 and 22?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 33 of 70 Page ID
#:7235
34
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 13.
COUNTS THIRTEEN THROUGH TWENTY
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on
Counts 13-20 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the
following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
13.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 14.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
14.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 15.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 34 of 70 Page ID
#:7236
35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
15.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 16.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
16.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 17.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
17.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 35 of 70 Page ID
#:7237
36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 18.
$12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur
Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan
18.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 19.
COUNT TWENTY-SIX
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant ARTUR AYVAZYAN on
Count 26 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the following
property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
19.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 36 of 70 Page ID
#:7238
37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 20.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
20.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 21.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
21.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 22.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
22.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 23.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 37 of 70 Page ID
#:7239
38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
23.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 24.
$12,520.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
Encino, California, at the residence of defendant Artur
Ayvazyan and Tamara Dadyan
24.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
____________________
______________________________
DATED
FOREPERSON
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 38 of 70 Page ID
#:7240
39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD AYVAZYAN,
MARIETTA TERABELIAN,
ARTUR AYVAZYAN,
TAMARA DADYAN,
MANUK GRIGORYAN,
ARMAN HAYRAPETYAN,
EDVARD PARONYAN,
VAHE DADYAN,
Defendants.
CR 2:20-579(A)-SVW
FORFEITURE SPECIAL VERDICT FORM=
FOR DEFENDANT MARIETTA TERABELIAN
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 39 of 70 Page ID
#:7241
40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
We, the jury in the above-captioned case, present the following
unanimous verdict as to defendant MARIETTA TERABELIAN:
COUNT ONE
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant MARIETTA
TERABELIAN on Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment (“FSI”),
the government seeks forfeiture of the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
1.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 2.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
2.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 3.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 40 of 70 Page ID
#:7242
41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
3.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 4.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
4.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 5.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
5.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 41 of 70 Page ID
#:7243
42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 6.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
6.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 7.
$3,422.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at Miami
International Airport
7.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 8.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 42 of 70 Page ID
#:7244
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
8.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 9.
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
9.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 10.
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
10.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 43 of 70 Page ID
#:7245
44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 11.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
11.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 12.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
12.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 13.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
13.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 44 of 70 Page ID
#:7246
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 14.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
14.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 15.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
15.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 16.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
16.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 45 of 70 Page ID
#:7247
46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 17.
COUNTS TWO THROUGH TWELVE
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant MARIETTA
TERABELIAN on Counts 2-12 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture
of the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
17.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 18.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
18.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 19.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 46 of 70 Page ID
#:7248
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
19.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 20.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
20.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 21.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
21.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 47 of 70 Page ID
#:7249
48
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 22.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
22.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 23.
$3,422.00.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at the Miami
International Airport
23.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 24.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 48 of 70 Page ID
#:7250
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
24.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 25.
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
25.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 26.
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
26.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 49 of 70 Page ID
#:7251
50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 27.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
27.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 28.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
28.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 29.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
29.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 50 of 70 Page ID
#:7252
51
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 30.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
30.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 31.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
31.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 32.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
32.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 2-12?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 51 of 70 Page ID
#:7253
52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 33.
COUNTS THIRTEEN THROUGH TWENTY
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant MARIETTA
TERABELIAN on Counts 13-20 of the FSI, the government seeks
forfeiture of the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
33.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 34.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
34.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 35.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 52 of 70 Page ID
#:7254
53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
35.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 36.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
36.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 37.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
37.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 53 of 70 Page ID
#:7255
54
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 38.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
38.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 39.
$3,422.00.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at the Miami
International Airport
39.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 40.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 54 of 70 Page ID
#:7256
55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
40.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 41.
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
41.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 42.
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
42.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 55 of 70 Page ID
#:7257
56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 43.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
43.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 44.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
44.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 45.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
45.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 56 of 70 Page ID
#:7258
57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 46.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
46.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 47.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
47.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 48.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
48.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 13-20?
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 57 of 70 Page ID
#:7259
58
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 49.
COUNT TWENTY-SIX
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant MARIETTA
TERABELIAN on Count 26 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of
the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
49.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 50.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
50.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 51.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 58 of 70 Page ID
#:7260
59
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
51.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 52.
$74,557.79 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account number ending in 7695 held in the name of Allstate
Towing & Transport LLC
52.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 53.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
53.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 54.
$451,185.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 5, 2020, in
various areas and backyard of a Tarzana, California
residence
54.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 59 of 70 Page ID
#:7261
60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 55.
$3,422.00.00 in U.S. Currency seized on November 20, 2020,
from Richard Ayvazyan and Marietta Terabelian at the Miami
International Airport
55.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 56.
One Audermars Piguet, Royal Oak 18 carat rose gold wrist
watch, model 26331, serial number J52335
56.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 57
One Rolex Datejust stainless steel wrist watch, model
126334, serial number 4U95Z313
57.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 60 of 70 Page ID
#:7262
61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Please proceed to Question 58.
One Audemars Piguet, Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number K23313
58.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 59.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore black ceramic wrist
watch, serial number LU44845K
59.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 60.
One Audemars Piguet Royal Oak stainless steel wrist watch,
serial number LW3397N
60.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 61.
One Rolex Day-Date watch, serial number W44P7238
61.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 61 of 70 Page ID
#:7263
62
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 62.
Sixty Gold Bullion Coins
62.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 63.
One 14 carat yellow gold 24” neck chain
63.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 64.
One Pair of 14 carat white gold earrings with diamond studs
64.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
____________________
______________________________
DATED
FOREPERSON
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 62 of 70 Page ID
#:7264
63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD AYVAZYAN,
MARIETTA TERABELIAN,
ARTUR AYVAZYAN,
TAMARA DADYAN,
MANUK GRIGORYAN,
ARMAN HAYRAPETYAN,
EDVARD PARONYAN,
VAHE DADYAN,
Defendants.
CR 2:20-579(A)-SVW
FORFEITURE SPECIAL VERDICT FORM=
FOR DEFENDANT VAHE DADYAN
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 63 of 70 Page ID
#:7265
64
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
We, the jury in the above-captioned case, present the following
unanimous verdict as to defendant VAHE DADYAN:
COUNT ONE
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant VAHE DADYAN on
Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment (“FSI”), the government
seeks forfeiture of the following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
1.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 2.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
2.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 3.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 64 of 70 Page ID
#:7266
65
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
3.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 4.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
4.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense
committed in Count 1?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 6.
COUNTS SEVEN THROUGH TWELVE
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant VAHE DADYAN on
Counts 7-12 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the
following property:
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 65 of 70 Page ID
#:7267
66
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
5.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 7-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 6.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
6.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 7-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 7.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
7.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 66 of 70 Page ID
#:7268
67
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 7-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 8.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
8.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 7-12?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 9.
COUNTS EIGHTEEN THROUGH TWENTY
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant VAHE DADYAN on
Counts 18-20 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the
following property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
9.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 67 of 70 Page ID
#:7269
68
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
committed in Counts 18-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 10.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
10.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 18-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 11.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
11.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 18-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 12.
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 68 of 70 Page ID
#:7270
69
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
12.
Do you unanimously find by the preponderance of the
evidence that this property is subject to forfeiture
because it constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses
committed in Counts 18-20?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 13.
COUNT TWENTY-SIX
Following the guilty verdict against Defendant VAHE DADYAN on
Count 26 of the FSI, the government seeks forfeiture of the following
property:
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Tarzana, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 2176-029-031
13.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 14.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Glendale, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 5663-036-033
14.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 69 of 70 Page ID
#:7271
70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 15.
All of the convicted defendant’s right, title and interest
in certain real property located in Palm Desert, California
identified by Assessors Parcel Number 694-331-008
15.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
Please proceed to Question 16.
$65,990.43 in bank funds seized from Bank of America
account ending in ‘9700 in the name of Runyan Tax Service
Inc.
16.
Do you unanimously find by a preponderance of the evidence
that this property is subject to forfeiture because it is
property involved in the offense committed in Count 26?
YES □
NO □
____________________
______________________________
DATED
FOREPERSON
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Document 596 Filed 06/27/21 Page 70 of 70 Page ID
#:7272File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.813904.596.0.pdf
- Size
- 324,364 bytes
- SHA-256
- 36f6cc4fd4b5ad4c1449a89631870a2a20d6e868576f030c58bc50d3d4611347
- Original
- PACER (login required)