Court filing
Factual Proffer Statement as to George Arestuche (ogn1) — United States v. Arestuche (Dkt. 17, S.D. Fla. No. 1:25-cr-20001)
Filed February 24, 2025 in Arestuche; one of 5 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2025-02-24 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 1:25-cr-20001-PCH · Doc. 17 · 2025-02-24 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT O F FLORIDA Casè No. 25-20001-Cr-HUCK/LO UIS UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA V. G EO RG E A RESTUCHE, Defendant. / STIPULATED FACTUA L BASIS The United States and GEORGE ARESTUCHE (dlthe defendant'') hereby stipulate and agree that had this m atter proceeded to trial, the United States w ould have osered evidence and testim ony sufficient to establish a factual basis beyond a reasohable doubt for the crim e charged, including the follow ing: The defendant, w ho resided in M iam i-Dade County, in the Southern District of Florida, was at aII relevant times em ployed by the M iam i-Dade Aviation Departm ent as an Airport Refrigeration/Ac M echanic. The defendant maintained an account at the Dade County Federal Credit Union (ICDCFCU'J). DCFCU was identified in the Information j ' as lthe Credit Union.'' DCFCU did business, including m aintaining branches, in the Southern District of Florida. The United States Small Business Administration (1'SBA') was an agency of the executive branch of the Governinent of the United States. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief; and Economic Security (.CARES'') Act was a federal law enacted in or around March 2020 that was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Case 1:25-cr-20001-PCH Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2025 Page 1 of 4 Am ericans who were suffering the econom ic efects caused by the COVID-19 pandem ic. One source of relïef provided by the CA RES Act w as the authorization and provision of funding to the SBA to provide Economic lnjury Disaster Loans (1EIDLs'') to eligible small businesses experiencing substantial financial disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandem ic to allow them to m eet financial obligations and operating expenses that otherwise could have been m et had the disaster not occurred. In order to obtain a COVID-19 EIDL, a qualifying for-profit business was required to subm it an EIDL application to the SBA and provide inform ation about its operations, including its gross revenues for the lz-m onth period preceding January 31, 2020. The applicant also was required to certify under penalty of perjury that alI the information in the application was true and correct. EIDL applications were subm itted directly to, and processed by, the SBA . The amount of the Ioan approved and any advance provided was determ ined based, in part, on the information provided in the application concerning the cost of goods sold. EIDL funds were issued directly by the United States government to the applicant's bank account via Electronic Funds Transfer. From in or around July 2020 through in or around August 2020, the defendant and an unindicted co-conspirator referred tq herein, and in the Information, as Individual 1, conspjred and agreed to devise a schem e to defraud the SBA by obtaining for the defendant both an EIDL and an EIDL advance to which the defendant was not entitled. As pad of this conspiracy, the defendant agreed to pay Individual 1 a Iarge fee for filing the necessary EIDL application on the defendant's behalf that w ould be owed if the defendant received the Ioan from the SBA. Case 1:25-cr-20001-PCH Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2025 Page 2 of 4 ln fudherance of this conspiracy, Individual 1, with the know ledge and on behalf of the defendant, subm itted to the SBA, via interstate w ire com m unications, a false and fraudulent EIDL application claim ing that the defendant was an independent contractor and the 100% owner of an 'A utom otive Repair'' business operating under the Iegal and DBA nam e 'lgeorge.'' That EIDL application falsely certified that for the lz-m onth period prior to January 31 , 2020, 'lgeorge' had gross revenues of $600,000, a cost of goods sold of $184,000, and 10 employees. In reality, contractor and did not ow n any type of business. the defendant w as not an independent In suppod of this EIDL application, Individual 1, w ith the knowledge and on behalf of the defendant, also subm itted and caused to be subm itted to the SBA a false and fraudulent Internal Revenue Service (.'IRS') Form 1040 in the defendant's name for calendar year 2019. This Form 1040 falsely claim ed that the defendant earned approximately $706,151 in total income from a business he allegedly operated. This Form 1040 included a 2019 Schedule C entitled ''Profit or Loss From Business (Sole Proprietorshipl'' that falsely claimed that the defendant had a llmechanic'' business that had gross receipts of $725,000 and earned a net profit of $706,151. As a result of this false and fraudulent EIDL application, the defendant fraudulently obtained from the SBA $149,900 in EIDL proceeds and a $10,000 EIDL advance, both of , ' which wefe sent by the SBA via Electronic Funds Transfer to the defendant's account at DCFCU. These Electronic Funds Transfers of EIDL proceeds involved the use of interstate wire communications. After receiving these iIDL proceeds from the SBA, the defendant paid Individual 1 his fee by providing him with two checks totaling Case 1:25-cr-20001-PCH Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2025 Page 3 of 4 approximately $17,275. The United States and the defendant agree that this Stipulated Factual Basis, while not containing aII facts known to the United States, is sulicient to satisfy aII the elem ents establishing the guilt of the defendant for the crim e charged in the Inform ation. HAYDEN P. O'BYRNE UNITED STATES ATTO RNEY Date: lYJ2X By: Edward N. Stam m Assistant United States Attorney By : By: ,,,-'f . . -..- oya g.,o Marco Fa ah, Esq. Attorney or Defendant George Arestuche G o e Arestuche ndant 'p V&,5 Date: 0& & zç Date: Case 1:25-cr-20001-PCH Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2025 Page 4 of 4
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flsd.681276.17.0.pdf
- Size
- 170,657 bytes
- SHA-256
- 827f3ba06eb4ebed2a4290e145c960cc1bcac8ed8ebe803f275988c760df0c84
- Original
- PACER (login required)