Court filing
Transcript of hearing as to Andre Lorquet held on 9-7-2023 — USA v. Lorquet (Dkt. 127, S.D. Fla.)
Filed May 28, 2024 in USA v. Lorquet; one of 145 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-05-28 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 1:22-cr-20326-KMM · Doc. 127 · 2024-05-28 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
MIAMI DIVISION
CASE NO. 22-cr-20326-KMM
3
4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
5
Plaintiff,
6
vs.
7
Miami, Florida
8
September 7, 2023
ANDRE LORQUET,
Pages 1-11
9
Defendant.
10
_____________________________________________________________________
11
TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING
BEFORE THE HONORABLE K. MICHAEL MOORE
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
APPEARANCES:
14
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
By: Jonathan Bailyn, A.U.S.A.
United States Attorney's Office
15
99 Northeast 4th Street
Miami, Florida 33130
16
17
18
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
By: Henry Philip Bell, Esq.
Bell, Rosquete, Reyes, Esteban, PLLC
19
999 Ponce De Leon Boulevard
Suite 1120
20
Coral Gables, FL 33134
21
22
REPORTED BY:
DAWN M. SAVINO, R.P.R., C.R.R.
Official Federal Court Stenographer
23
111 North Adams Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
24
Telephone: 850-521-3674
Dawn_Savino@flnd.uscourts.gov
25
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 1 of 11
2
1
P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S
2
9:55 AM
THE COURT: Good morning, everyone. Please be seated.
3
9:55 AM
Please call the case.
4
9:55 AM
COURTROOM DEPUTY: Calling case number 22-CR-20326, the
5
9:55 AM
United States of America versus Andre Lorquet.
6
9:55 AM
Counsel, please state your appearances, beginning with the
7
9:55 AM
government.
8
9:55 AM
MR. BAILYN: Good morning, Your Honor. Jonathan Bailyn on
9
9:55 AM
behalf of the United States.
10
9:55 AM
THE COURT: Good morning.
11
9:55 AM
MS. CHAREST-TURKEN: Good morning, Judge, Raemy
12
9:55 AM
Charest-Turken from Asset Forfeiture.
13
9:55 AM
THE COURT: Good morning.
14
9:55 AM
MR. BAILYN: This is Special Agent Jose Hernandez from HSI.
15
9:56 AM
THE COURT: Good morning.
16
9:56 AM
MR. BELL: Good morning, Judge. Henry Bell on behalf of
17
9:56 AM
the defendant, Andre Lorquet, who is, of course, in court sitting to
18
9:56 AM
my right.
19
9:56 AM
THE COURT: Okay. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for
20
9:56 AM
coming in.
21
9:56 AM
So Mr. Bell, I appreciate you being here and taking on the
22
9:56 AM
assignment. I got your motion to withdraw.
23
9:56 AM
So this is sort of the second go-around that we've been in
24
9:56 AM
in this case. The first time around we granted the prior attorney's
25
9:56 AM
motion to withdraw. And we could do that right now and then the
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 2 of 11
3
1
9:56 AM
defendant would be left back in the position where he's entered a
2
9:56 AM
plea.
3
9:56 AM
But I think as I may have referenced at an earlier hearing
4
9:57 AM
-- and I understand that there are irreconcilable differences and
5
9:57 AM
that you're not in a position to divulge your attorney-client
6
9:57 AM
relationships and communications, and I respect that. But he's
7
9:57 AM
moving for -- the defendant wants to move to withdraw his guilty
8
9:57 AM
plea, and I'm assuming the government opposes that. Is that correct?
9
9:57 AM
MR. BAILYN: Yes, Your Honor. We filed an objection to the
10
9:57 AM
magistrate's report and recommendation at Docket Entry 70 where we
11
9:57 AM
laid out our rationale for opposing that motion.
12
9:57 AM
THE COURT: Okay. And that was late as I recall in time?
13
9:57 AM
MR. BAILYN: Your Honor allowed us to file it late. I had
14
9:57 AM
a misunderstanding with the procedural posture.
15
9:57 AM
THE COURT: In any event it's the government's position
16
9:57 AM
still on the substance, forget the tardiness, but on the substance
17
9:58 AM
you're still opposing the motion to withdraw.
18
9:58 AM
MR. BAILYN: Yes, Your Honor.
19
9:58 AM
THE COURT: Okay. So Mr. Bell, I wonder whether the
20
9:58 AM
conflict would extend to prohibiting you from continuing to represent
21
9:58 AM
the defendant for the referral of the motion to withdraw the guilty
22
9:58 AM
plea to be heard by the magistrate judge, and the magistrate judge
23
9:58 AM
will conduct whatever hearing as to the knowing and voluntariliness
24
9:58 AM
of the plea that was entered, and then give a report and
25
9:58 AM
recommendation to me. And if it's determined that she recommends
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 3 of 11
4
1
9:58 AM
that he should be allowed to do it, the government will file
2
9:58 AM
objections. If she determines that he should not be allowed, you can
3
9:58 AM
file your objections and we can tee it up and make it a ripe motion
4
9:58 AM
and make a ruling on it. And if we have to have a hearing, we'll
5
9:58 AM
have a hearing.
6
9:59 AM
But are you in a position -- and then once that gets
7
9:59 AM
resolved, depending on how it does get resolved, we can revisit the
8
9:59 AM
motion to withdraw as attorney for the defendant.
9
9:59 AM
Is that something that you can live with?
10
9:59 AM
MR. BELL: I believe so. I would, if the court will
11
9:59 AM
indulge me, ask for a second or two here to confer with Mr. Lorquet.
12
9:59 AM
THE COURT: Sure. Okay. Please do.
13
9:59 AM
(Counsel conferring with defendant)
14
10:00 AM
MR. BELL: Judge, following up on your comments, I think
15
10:00 AM
yes, I can live with that. I will -- we can shelve, if you will, the
16
10:00 AM
motion to withdraw as counsel, and I will continue to represent him
17
10:01 AM
and his motion to withdraw the plea as you've articulated or
18
10:01 AM
described here this morning.
19
10:01 AM
You know, he's asking or wants that to move forward or that
20
10:01 AM
be re-filed, for lack of a better term. And if you're referring it
21
10:01 AM
to Judge Louis, I will address it before Judge Louis and then file
22
10:01 AM
whatever objection if any is necessary.
23
10:01 AM
THE COURT: Okay.
24
10:01 AM
So Mr. Lorquet, let me address you personally. I do think
25
10:01 AM
at this point, while you may have some disagreements with your lawyer
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 4 of 11
5
1
10:01 AM
about other matters, that at least with respect to this issue of
2
10:01 AM
motion to withdraw the guilty plea, you would be better served by
3
10:01 AM
having a lawyer at your side than trying to do it on your own. Or
4
10:01 AM
having -- you know, maybe the magistrate judge, if I just referred it
5
10:02 AM
to her, would then say well, now we're going to get a third attorney
6
10:02 AM
for just that hearing. I don't think it would really serve anybody's
7
10:02 AM
interests, I mean, unless you just can't get along with Mr. Bell,
8
10:02 AM
period. But, I mean, I think with respect to this particular motion
9
10:02 AM
to withdraw the guilty plea, that you would be better served by
10
10:02 AM
having a lawyer familiar with the case, and Mr. Bell is familiar in
11
10:02 AM
that regard. I think he could serve you. Depending on how it goes
12
10:02 AM
after that, then we'll address where we are in that posture so --
13
10:02 AM
whatever that posture is at that time.
14
10:02 AM
With respect to the referral, there is an outstanding
15
10:03 AM
motion to refer. Do we know what it is on the docket?
16
10:03 AM
MR. BAILYN: So Your Honor, procedurally the report and
17
10:03 AM
recommendation and the motion to withdraw the guilty plea has been
18
10:03 AM
denied as moot because the defense filed, on July 24th, an unopposed
19
10:03 AM
motion to withdraw the motion to withdraw. That motion was granted,
20
10:03 AM
and then the court denied as moot the pending objection -- or excuse
21
10:03 AM
me, the pending report and recommendation and the pending motion to
22
10:03 AM
withdraw the guilty plea.
23
10:03 AM
So I think there's two -- if I may continue, Your Honor, I
24
10:03 AM
think there would be two ways to go about doing this if the court
25
10:03 AM
were to entertain a motion to withdraw.
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 5 of 11
6
1
10:03 AM
THE COURT: Yeah, that's what I want to hear.
2
10:03 AM
MR. BAILYN: Yeah. I guess it would be to sort of -- to
3
10:03 AM
vacate the order denying as moot, or to allow the defendant to file a
4
10:03 AM
new motion to withdraw the guilty plea and start the process anew.
5
10:04 AM
THE COURT: Okay. Do you have a preference? You didn't
6
10:04 AM
file the first motion to withdraw the guilty plea.
7
10:04 AM
MR. BELL: That would be correct.
8
10:04 AM
THE COURT: Okay. So if you want your own handiwork on the
9
10:04 AM
pleading, I'm happy to -- I mean it's more work for you, I'm happy --
10
10:04 AM
MR. BELL: It's not the work, Judge.
11
10:04 AM
THE COURT: Well --
12
10:04 AM
MR. BELL: You know, I mean, again, I don't want to get
13
10:04 AM
into my attorney-client relationship but, I mean, I think either one
14
10:04 AM
of those two -- if you don't mind, if we could sort of speak out loud
15
10:04 AM
or think out loud here for a second. If you vacate the order, as
16
10:04 AM
counsel has suggested, then there's an objection pending before the
17
10:04 AM
court, right? And then I would need to respond to the objection and
18
10:04 AM
then you would decide it? Or would this just go back to Judge Louis?
19
10:04 AM
My guess is procedurally, the way I'm sort of reading
20
10:05 AM
things, if you vacate the order granting our motion to withdraw, the
21
10:05 AM
motion to withdraw the plea, then that puts the government's
22
10:05 AM
objection to Judge Louis's report and recommendation in play, if you
23
10:05 AM
will. Do we agree there?
24
10:05 AM
THE COURT: Say that again?
25
10:05 AM
MR. BELL: Okay. So procedurally what happened here,
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 6 of 11
7
1
10:05 AM
Judge, is the following: Judge Louis entered a report and
2
10:05 AM
recommendation that the motion to withdraw the plea be granted. You
3
10:05 AM
may recall that.
4
10:05 AM
THE COURT: And she did that on the basis that it was
5
10:05 AM
unopposed.
6
10:05 AM
MR. BELL: Yeah. I mean, she cited in the report and
7
10:05 AM
recommendation that the averments were unrebutted. The government
8
10:05 AM
then filed an objection to that report and recommendation, and in
9
10:05 AM
that objection they explained why they hadn't rebutted, if you will,
10
10:06 AM
the averments earlier. Then I was appointed. Right?
11
10:06 AM
THE COURT: Right.
12
10:06 AM
MR. BELL: I'm appointed with that objection pending before
13
10:06 AM
Your Honor. We then, the defendant, moved to withdraw the motion to
14
10:06 AM
withdraw the guilty plea. You granted that motion rendering the
15
10:06 AM
objection moot, and that's kind of where we are today.
So
16
10:06 AM
if you vacate that order, right, that renders the whole thing moot
17
10:06 AM
and granting my motion to withdraw the motion to withdraw the plea,
18
10:06 AM
procedurally it seems to me that that objection that was pending --
19
10:06 AM
and to be more specific, the objection to Judge Louis's R and R -- is
20
10:06 AM
now in play again. That becomes viable, if you will. And I guess my
21
10:06 AM
question of you is whether you agree with that procedural
22
10:06 AM
understanding.
23
10:07 AM
THE COURT: Well, so step one in this scenario would be
24
10:07 AM
that I would be vacating the order granting the motion to withdraw
25
10:07 AM
the guilty plea, right?
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 7 of 11
8
1
10:07 AM
MR. BELL: Right. No, you would be vacating the order --
2
10:07 AM
yes. The order granting the motion -- I'm sorry. No, you're right.
3
10:07 AM
I think you described it correctly. I apologize.
4
10:07 AM
THE COURT: And that is docket entry number?
5
10:07 AM
MR. BAILYN: 77.
6
10:07 AM
THE COURT: That also would -- that would leave open the --
7
10:07 AM
MR. BELL: The government's objections.
8
10:07 AM
THE COURT: The government's objections?
9
10:07 AM
MR. BELL: Right. So I think candidly --
10
10:08 AM
THE COURT: So that should be denied as well without
11
10:08 AM
prejudice. What is that docket entry?
12
10:08 AM
MR. BAILYN: Is Your Honor referring to the government's
13
10:08 AM
objections or the report and recommendation?
14
10:08 AM
THE COURT: Yes, the government's objections.
15
10:08 AM
MR. BAILYN: So the objections are Docket Entry 70.
16
10:08 AM
MR. BELL: So if you denied those objections and ruled
17
10:08 AM
against the United States, then you would be vacating the plea.
18
10:08 AM
Perhaps the easier route is just to allow the defendant to
19
10:08 AM
re-file or file a new motion to vacate the plea. That would allow me
20
10:08 AM
to work with him on that, although that gets awfully close to the
21
10:08 AM
reasons why I'm here on a motion to withdraw as counsel.
22
10:09 AM
THE COURT: Well, okay. I wouldn't deny them without
23
10:09 AM
prejudice, I would deny them as moot in light of the referral back to
24
10:09 AM
the magistrate judge on the --
25
10:09 AM
MR. BELL: On the original motion.
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 8 of 11
9
1
10:09 AM
THE COURT: On the original motion, or your new motion.
2
10:09 AM
MR. BELL: But if you did that -- that makes sense, Judge,
3
10:09 AM
right? Because then she would then -- they would have the
4
10:09 AM
opportunity to file a response to his motion before Magistrate Louis
5
10:09 AM
is basically what you're getting at.
6
10:09 AM
THE COURT: Right. Okay.
7
10:09 AM
So let's do that. Let's have you -- see what happens when
8
10:10 AM
you don't file your objections on time?
9
10:10 AM
So you'll go ahead and file a motion to withdraw the guilty
10
10:10 AM
plea, right?
11
10:10 AM
MR. BELL: I can do that.
12
10:10 AM
THE COURT: And how long will it take for you to do that?
13
10:10 AM
MR. BELL: You know, ordinarily it would be quick. But
14
10:10 AM
candidly I'm really busy this week, and next week I'm going to be at
15
10:10 AM
the CJA conference. So I would ask for two weeks.
16
10:10 AM
THE COURT: Two weeks? Today is the 7th. So why don't we
17
10:10 AM
give you until -- this will give you something to do on a weekend.
18
10:10 AM
We'll give you until the 18th. That's a Monday.
19
10:10 AM
MR. BELL: That's fair.
20
10:10 AM
THE COURT: To file a motion to withdraw the guilty plea.
21
10:11 AM
When I get that, I will vacate the order granting the
22
10:11 AM
motion to withdraw guilty plea, Docket 77. I will deny as moot
23
10:11 AM
Docket Entry Number 70, and I will refer the motion to withdraw the
24
10:11 AM
guilty plea to the magistrate judge, and I will deny without
25
10:11 AM
prejudice the motion to withdraw counsel.
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 9 of 11
10
1
10:11 AM
Tell me what's wrong.
2
10:11 AM
MR. BAILYN: Yeah. So, Your Honor, Docket Entry 77 is the
3
10:11 AM
paperless order granting the defendant's motion to withdraw his
4
10:11 AM
guilty plea. If the court were to vacate that order, it would be
5
10:12 AM
vacating denials as moot that were contained within that order, and
6
10:12 AM
it would therefore make Judge Louis's current report and
7
10:12 AM
recommendation viable again, as well as the previous motion to
8
10:12 AM
withdraw.
9
10:12 AM
I don't think there's a need to do anything with Docket
10
10:12 AM
Number 77. As of now, we have sort of a blank slate. And if Your
11
10:12 AM
Honor would like the defendant to file a new motion to withdraw, the
12
10:12 AM
government can file its responses and we can start that process anew.
13
10:12 AM
THE COURT: And what happens with these other orders that
14
10:12 AM
are outstanding?
15
10:12 AM
MR. BAILYN: They're not outstanding. They've been denied
16
10:12 AM
as moot, Your Honor.
17
10:12 AM
THE COURT: No action needs to be taken on 77?
18
10:12 AM
MR. BELL: I think he's right, because basically we're just
19
10:12 AM
filing a second motion to withdraw the plea. The other one has been
20
10:12 AM
resolved already, and now he's coming back with a second.
21
10:12 AM
THE COURT: Okay. Don't do anything?
22
10:13 AM
MR. BELL: I mean, I'll defer to the court but I understand
23
10:13 AM
Mr. Bailyn's, sort of, procedural point that what we're really doing
24
10:13 AM
here is permitting, if you will, the defendant, despite the prior
25
10:13 AM
rulings and the prior motions, to advance a second motion to withdraw
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 10 of 11
11
1
10:13 AM
his guilty plea.
2
10:13 AM
THE COURT: Okay. I just want to make sure that our record
3
10:13 AM
for appellate review purposes, that they understand what we did and
4
10:13 AM
why we did it.
5
10:13 AM
MR. BELL: I understand.
6
10:13 AM
THE COURT: So I'm not going to do anything then other than
7
10:13 AM
wait until the 28th for you to file your motion to withdraw your
8
10:13 AM
guilty plea.
9
10:13 AM
MR. BELL: Understood.
10
10:13 AM
THE COURT: Okay?
11
10:13 AM
MR. BAILYN: Is it the 28th? I think you had earlier said
12
10:13 AM
the 18th.
13
10:13 AM
THE COURT: The 18th. Excuse me.
14
10:13 AM
MR. BELL: The 18th is fine, and thank you.
15
10:13 AM
THE COURT: Okay. Anything else? Thank you for coming in.
16
10:13 AM
MR. BELL: Thank you, Judge.
17
10:13 AM
COURTROOM DEPUTY: All rise.
18
10:13 AM
(PROCEEDINGS CONCLUDED)
19
10:13 AM
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from
20
10:13 AM
the record of the proceedings in the above-entitled matter. Any
redaction of personal data identifiers pursuant to the Judicial
21
10:13 AM
Conference Policy on Privacy is noted within the transcript.
22
10:13 AM
5-28-2024 /s/ Dawn M. Savino, R.P.R., C.R.R.
Date
DAWN M. SAVINO, R.P.R., C.R.R.
23
10:13 AM
24
10:13 AM
25
PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY
TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED BY COMPUTER
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2024 Page 11 of 11File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flsd.616975.127.0.pdf
- Size
- 63,171 bytes
- SHA-256
- e4f32cb6ea76c6a4f77dc1ea8c4367adff8ea7af0c66dbde9efcbc233efc1f0c
- Original
- PACER (login required)