Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Thomas et al — Amanda Christian filings, N.D. Ga., Atlanta MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE RESTITUTION PAYEES re 624 Judgment and Commitment,,,, 1055… — USA…

Court filing

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE RESTITUTION PAYEES re 624 Judgment and Commitment,,,, 1055… — USA v. Thomas et al (Dkt. 1206)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2025-12-10

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS · Doc. 1206 · 2025-12-10 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An omnibus motion by the United States to substitute restitution payees in United States v. Darrell Thomas, Teldrin Foster, et al., No. 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, filed December 10, 2025 (Doc. 1206). It states that the 20 defendants were ordered to pay restitution to five lenders: Harvest Small Business Finance, CDC Small Business Finance, Cross River Bank, Customers Bank and Celtic Bank. The motion says the SBA purchased the guarantees on the loans, which it lists with the amounts due, and became subrogated to the lenders' rights. Citing 18 U.S.C. § 3663A and 18 U.S.C. § 3664(j)(1), it asks the court to substitute the SBA as payee under Exhibit 1 without changing restitution balances. It is signed by Assistant United States Attorney Vanessa A. Leo.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
v. 
DARRELL THOMAS, 
TELDRIN FOSTER, ET AL. 
 
Criminal Action No. 
1:20-CR-00296-JPB 
 
OMNIBUS MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE RESTITUTION  
PAYEES AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF 
The United States of America, by Theodore S. Hertzberg, United States 
Attorney, and Vanessa A. Leo, Assistant United States Attorney for the Northern 
District of Georgia, respectfully requests an order substituting the restitution 
payees pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, and in support shows: 
Background Information 
1. 
On March 29, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic 
Security (CARES) Act was enacted into federal law. The CARES Act was designed 
to provide emergency financial assistance to millions of Americans who were 
suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of 
relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of guaranteed forgivable 
loans to small businesses through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).  
2. 
In order to obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business submitted a PPP 
loan application, which was signed by an authorized representative of the 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 1 of 10

2 
 
business. The PPP loan application required the business (through its authorized 
representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative 
certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan. In the PPP loan 
application (Smal Business Administration Form 2483), the small business 
(through its authorized representative) was required to provide, among other 
things, its: (a) average monthly payroll expenses; and (b) number of employees. 
These figures were used to calculate the amount of money the small business was 
eligible to receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan 
were required to provide documentation confirming their payroll expenses.  
3. 
A PPP loan application was processed by a participating lender. If a 
PPP loan application was approved, the participating lender funded the PPP loan 
using its own monies. While it was the participating lender that issued the PPP 
loan, the loan was 100% guaranteed by the Small Business Administration 
(“SBA”). Data from the application, including information about the borrower, the 
total amount of the loan, and the listed number of employees, was transmitted by 
the lender to the SBA in the course of processing the loan.  
4. 
PPP loan proceeds were required to be used by the business on certain 
permissible expenses- payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The 
PPP allowed the interest and principal on the PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if 
the business spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a designated 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 2 of 10

3 
 
period of time and used a defined portion of the PPP loan proceeds on payroll 
expenses.  
5. 
The present case containing twenty (20) defendants initially 
commenced on August 4, 2020, by indictment. Each of the 20 defendants entered 
negotiated pleas of guilty to various offenses related to fraudulently obtained PPP 
loans during the COVID pandemic. 
6. 
This Court imposed criminal monetary penalties on each of the 20 
defendants, ordering restitution be paid jointly and severally in this case and in 
related criminal cases1 to the following respective lenders: Harvest Small Business 
Finance, CDC Small Business Finance, Cross River Bank, Customers Bank, and 
Celtic Bank. 
7. 
The SBA purchased the guarantees on the fraudulently obtained PPP 
loans as required by the CARES Act in this case and related criminal cases. The 
SBA’s purchase of the guarantees on the fraudulently obtained PPP loans made 
the respective lenders whole, and the SBA became subrogated to all rights of the 
respective lenders. SBA’s purchase of the guarantees on the fraudulently obtained 
PPP loans is detailed in Exhibit 1 attached to this Motion and coincides with the 
 
1 U.S. v. Redding, 1:21-cr-178; U.S. v. Denesseria Slaton, 1:21-cr-179; U.S. v. Gaines, 1:21-cr-206; and U.S. v. 
Pyfrom-Foster, 1:23-cr-164. 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 3 of 10

4 
 
Judgment and Commitment entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055). More 
specifically, the SBA purchased the following guarantees: 
a. 
Harvest Small Business Finance Loan No. 5333777210 made to Darrell 
Thomas and Megan Thomas on behalf of their company, Bellator 
Phront Group, Inc., in the amount of $799,955.35. At the time the 
Judgment and Commitment was entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 
1055), the amount due to Harvest Small Business Finance was 
$775,956.69. The Certified Statement of Account showing the SBA 
purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit A. 
b. 
Harvest Small Business Loan No. 9948117804 made to Derek Parker 
on behalf of his company, D. Parker Holdings, Inc., in the amount of 
$818,102.00. At the time the Judgment and Commitment was entered 
in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to Harvest Small 
Business Finance was $793,558.94. The Certified Statement of Account 
showing the SBA purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit B. 
c. 
Harvest Small Business Loan No. 9097577901 made to Charmaine 
Redding (U.S. v. Redding, 1:21-cr-178) on behalf of her company, All 
Star Room & Board Services of Michigan Inc., in the amount of 
$750,298.11. At the time the Judgment and Commitment was entered 
in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to Harvest Small 
Business Finance was $715,826.05. The Certified Statement of Account 
showing the SBA purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit C.  
d. 
CDC Small Business Finance Corporation loan No. 5005788003 made 
to Ryan Whittley on behalf of his company, ML Exotic Customs, Inc., 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 4 of 10

5 
 
in the amount of $797,275.000. At the time the Judgment and 
Commitment was entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the 
amount due to CDC Small Business Finance Corporation was 
$773,356.75. The Certified Statement of Account showing the SBA 
purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit D. 
e. 
CDC Small Business Finance Corporation loan No. 7688278109 made 
to El Hadj Sall on behalf of his company, Bellevie Corp., in the amount 
of $823,585.00. At the time the Judgment and Commitment was 
entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to CDC 
Small Business Finance Corporation was $798,877.45. The Certified 
Statement of Account showing the SBA purchased this loan is 
attached as Exhibit E. 
f. 
CDC Small Business Finance Corporation loan No. 7071928005 made 
to Charles Hill, IV on behalf of his company, Infinite Education 
Services, Inc., in the amount of $854,805.00. At the time the Judgment 
and Commitment was entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the 
amount due to CDC Small Business Finance Corporation was 
$829,160.00. The Certified Statement of Account showing the SBA 
purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit F. 
g. 
Cross River Bank loan No. 8300887401 made to John Gaines and 
Andre Gaines (U.S. v. Gaines, 1:21-cr-206) on behalf of their company, 
Gaines Reservation and Travel, in the amount of $806,710.00. At the 
time the Judgment and Commitment was entered in Teldrin Foster’s 
case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to Cross River Bank was $782,508.70. 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 5 of 10

6 
 
The Certified Statement of Account showing the SBA purchased this 
loan is attached as Exhibit G. 
h. 
Cross River Bank loan No. 7871687410 made to Kahlil Gibran Green, 
Sr. on behalf of his company, Impact Creations, LLC, in the amount 
of $830,000.00.   At the time the Judgment and Commitment was 
entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to 
Harvest Small Business Finance was $805,100.00. The Certified 
Statement of Account showing the SBA purchased this loan is 
attached as Exhibit H. 
i. 
 Cross River Bank loan No. 9327227407 made to Bern Benoit on behalf 
of his company, Transportation Management Services, in the amount 
of $830,417.00.  At the time the Judgment and Commitment was 
entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to Cross 
River Bank was $805,504.49. The Certified Statement of Account 
showing the SBA purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit I. 
j. 
Customers Bank loan No. 3869848006 made to David Belgrave III on 
behalf of his company, Continuing Success, Inc., in the amount of 
$727,000.00. At the time the Judgment and Commitment was entered 
in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to Customers 
Bank was $705,190.00. The Certified Statement of Account showing 
the SBA purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit J. 
k. 
Customers Bank loan No. 6917877410 made to Ricky Dixon on behalf 
of his company, RK Painting Company, in the amount of $775,000.00. 
At the time the Judgment and Commitment was entered in Teldrin 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 6 of 10

7 
 
Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to Customers Bank was 
$751,750.00. The Certified Statement of Account showing the SBA 
purchased this loan is attached as Exhibit K. 
l. 
Celtic Bank loan No. 9096407404 made to Ricky Dixon on behalf of his 
company, Lee Operations, LLC, in the amount of $805,813.00. At the 
time the Judgment and Commitment was entered in Teldrin Foster’s 
case (Dkt. 1055), the amount due to Celtic Bank was $781,638.61. The 
Certified Statement of Account showing the SBA purchased this loan 
is attached as Exhibit L. 
 
8. 
The United States contends the SBA is entitled to restitution as 
subrogee of the respective lenders: Harvest Small Business Finance, CDC Small 
Business Finance, Cross River Bank, Customers Bank, and Celtic Bank in this case 
and in related criminal cases. 
9.  
The Clerk of Court should be ordered to substitute the restitution 
payee in this case to the SBA as subrogee of the respective lenders pursuant to 
Exhibit 1 which coincides with the Judgment and Commitment entered in Teldrin 
Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055). 
Argument and Application of Law 
10. 
18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(1)(A) requires the Court to order restitution in the 
full amount of each victim’s loss. The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act defines 
a victim as “a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 7 of 10

8 
 
commission of an offense for which restitution may be ordered.” 18 U.S.C. § 
3663A. The SBA suffered proven financial losses as result of fraudulently obtained 
PPP loans, yet possesses no hope of being made whole with the judgements as 
they currently stand. Thus, the United States recommends substituting the SBA as 
restitution payee pursuant to Exhibit 1 which coincides with the Judgment and 
Commitment entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055). 
11. 
The United States does not seek to alter the court’s judgment ordering 
the defendant’s liability to pay the total amount of restitution originally imposed. 
The United States merely requests an adjustment to the disbursement of restitution 
payments in compliance with 18 U.S.C. § 3664(j)(1), which provides: 
If a victim has received compensation from insurance or any other 
source with respect to a loss, the court shall order that restitution be 
paid to the person who provided or is obligated to provide the 
compensation, but the restitution order shall provide that all 
restitution of victims required by the order be paid to the victims 
before any restitution is paid to such a provider of compensation. 
 
 
12. 
The victim payees comprised of the respective lenders: Harvest Small 
Business Finance, CDC Small Business Finance, Cross River Bank, Customers 
Bank, and Celtic Bank have received compensation from the SBA. Accordingly, 
the United States requests that the Clerk of Court substitute the SBA as the victim 
and disburse restitution payments pursuant to Exhibit 1 which coincides with the 
Judgment and Commitment entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055). 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 8 of 10

9 
 
13. 
A proposed order is submitted to the Court contemporaneously for  
its consideration.  
WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that this Court 
substitute the Small Business Administration as the restitution payee in the above-
captioned case pursuant to Exhibit 1 which coincides with the Judgment and 
Commitment entered in Teldrin Foster’s case (Dkt. 1055). This amendment would 
not change the balance of Defendants’ restitution debts and therefore would not 
substantively alter their rights, or the criminal sentences imposed by the court. 
 
Submitted this 10th day of December, 2025.  
 
Respectfully Submitted, 
 
THEODORE S. HERTZBERG  
United States Attorney 
 
/s/ Vanessa A. Leo 
Vanessa A. Leo 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Georgia Bar No. 410598 
600 United States Courthouse 
75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W. 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 
(404) 581-6037 
Vanessa.Leo@usdoj.gov 
 
 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 9 of 10

10 
 
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 
I hereby certify, pursuant to Local Rules 5.1B and 7.1D, that the foregoing 
response has been typed using 13-point Book Antiqua font.  
/s/ Vanessa A. Leo             
 
VANESSA A. LEO 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
This is to certify that on this date, the foregoing document was electronically 
filed using the Court’s Electronic Case Filing program, which sends a notice of this 
document and an accompanying link to this document to all parties who have 
appeared in this case under the Court’s Electronic Case Filing program.  
Dated: December 10, 2025  
 
/s/ Vanessa A. Leo             
 
VANESSA A. LEO 
Assistant United States Attorney 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Georgia Bar No. 410598 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
600 U.S. Courthouse 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 
404-581-6037 
Vanessa.Leo@usdoj.gov  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS     Document 1206     Filed 12/10/25     Page 10 of 10

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.292218.1206.0.pdf
Size
183,800 bytes
SHA-256
30cc7c108ed9bec54fdbb474cf2819c590f9ced09956825c458d01fc736e8cd9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.292218.1206.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top