RULE 5(F) ORDER as to Chris Recamier, Adedayo Ilori. SO ORDERED — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 11)

Summary

An Order of United States District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil, Document 11, stamped Filed 12/15/21, in United States of America v. Adedayo Ilori and Chris Recamier, 21-CR-0746 (MKV), in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. It is entered under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due Process Protections Act to confirm the Government's disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States. The order states that the Government must promptly disclose favorable information material to guilt or punishment and impeachment information, and that the obligations are continuing. It lists possible consequences of non-compliance, including a continuance, evidentiary sanctions, contempt and dismissal of charges, and is dated December 15, 2021.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
-v-
ADEDAYO ILORI, and 
CHRIS RECAMIER 
Defendants. 
21-CR-0746 (MKV)
ORDER 
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: 
This Order is entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due 
Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116–182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the 
Government’s disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its 
progeny, and to summarize the possible consequences of violating those obligations. 
The Government must disclose to the defense all information “favorable to an accused” that 
is “material either to guilt or to punishment” and that is known to the Government.  Id. at 87.  This 
obligation applies regardless of whether the defendant requests this information or whether the 
information would itself constitute admissible evidence.  The Government shall disclose such 
information to the defense promptly after its existence becomes known to the Government so that 
the defense may make effective use of the information in the preparation of its case. 
As part of these obligations, the Government must disclose any information that can be used 
to impeach the trial testimony of a Government witness within the meaning of Giglio v. United 
States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and its progeny.  Such information must be disclosed sufficiently in 
12/15/2021
USDC SDNY 
DOCUMENT 
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 
DOC #: 
 
 
 
DATE FILED: 
 
 
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 11     Filed 12/15/21     Page 1 of 3

2 
 
advance of trial in order for the defendant to make effective use of it at trial or at such other time as 
the Court may order.1 
The foregoing obligations are continuing ones and apply to materials that become known to 
the Government in the future.  These obligations also apply to information that is otherwise subject 
to disclosure regardless of whether the Government credits it. 
In the event the Government believes that a disclosure under this Order would compromise 
witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other 
substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a modification of its obligations, 
which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of 
the information otherwise subject to disclosure.2 
For purposes of this Order, the Government has an affirmative obligation to seek all 
information subject to disclosure under this Order from all current or former federal, state, and local 
prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the prosecution, 
or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the defendant is 
charged.  
If the Government fails to comply with this Order, the Court, in addition to ordering 
production of the information, may: 
(1) specify the terms and conditions of such production; 
(2) grant a continuance; 
(3) impose evidentiary sanctions;  
(4) impose contempt or other sanctions on any lawyer responsible for violations of the 
Government’s disclosure obligations, or refer the matter to disciplinary authorities; 
                                                 
1 This Order does not purport to set forth an exhaustive list of the Government’s disclosure obligations. 
2 The Classified Information Procedures Act sets forth separate procedures to be followed in the event that the 
Government believes matters relating to classified information may arise in connection with the prosecution.  See 18 
U.S.C. app. 3 §§ 1 et seq. 
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 11     Filed 12/15/21     Page 2 of 3

3 
 
(5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or 
(6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances. 
 
SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated: December 15, 2021 
         
 
New York, NY 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         _______________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
          MARY KAY VYSKOCIL 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 11     Filed 12/15/21     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.11.0.pdf

Size

205,502 bytes

SHA-256

8fb63dd4988685d0126fd7d8a2ec5b2683bfd088ad1aee294e1f0b5574351233

Our copy

gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.11.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)