Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings 003 ECF 19 Gov Uscourts RULE 5(F) Order as to Rafael Martinez. SO Ordered — USA v. Martinez (Dkt. 19, S.D.N.Y.)

Court filing

RULE 5(F) Order as to Rafael Martinez. SO Ordered — USA v. Martinez (Dkt. 19, S.D.N.Y.)

Filed May 16, 2026 in 003 ECF 19 Gov Uscourts, the only filing from this case in the archive.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Filed2026-05-16

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · No. 1:22-cr-00251-LJL · Doc. 19 · 2026-05-16 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
-v-  
 
RAFAEL MARTINEZ, 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
 
22-CR-251 (LJL) 
 
ORDER 
 
 
 
Lewis J. Liman, United States District Judge: 
This Order is entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due 
Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116–182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the 
Government’s disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its 
progeny, and to summarize the possible consequences of violating those obligations. 
The Government must disclose to the defense all information “favorable to an accused” that 
is “material either to guilt or to punishment” and that is known to the Government.  Id. at 87.  This 
obligation applies regardless of whether the defendant requests this information or whether the 
information would itself constitute admissible evidence.  The Government shall disclose such 
information to the defense promptly after its existence becomes known to the Government so that 
the defense may make effective use of the information in the preparation of its case. 
As part of these obligations, the Government must disclose any information that can be used 
to impeach the trial testimony of a Government witness within the meaning of Giglio v. United 
States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and its progeny.  Such information must be disclosed sufficiently in 
advance of trial in order for the defendant to make effective use of it at trial or at such other time as 
the Court may order.1 
 
1 This Order does not purport to set forth an exhaustive list of the Government’s disclosure obligations. 
Case 1:22-cr-00251-LJL   Document 19   Filed 05/20/22   Page 1 of 3

2 
 
The foregoing obligations are continuing ones and apply to materials that become known to 
the Government in the future.  These obligations also apply to information that is otherwise subject 
to disclosure regardless of whether the Government credits it. 
In the event the Government believes that a disclosure under this Order would compromise 
witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other 
substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a modification of its obligations, 
which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of 
the information otherwise subject to disclosure.2 
For purposes of this Order, the Government has an affirmative obligation to seek all 
information subject to disclosure under this Order from all current or former federal, state, and local 
prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the prosecution, 
or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the defendant is 
charged.  
If the Government fails to comply with this Order, the Court, in addition to ordering 
production of the information, may: 
(1) specify the terms and conditions of such production; 
(2) grant a continuance; 
(3) impose evidentiary sanctions;  
(4) impose contempt or other sanctions on any lawyer responsible for violations of the 
Government’s disclosure obligations, or refer the matter to disciplinary authorities; 
(5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or 
(6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances. 
 
 
2 The Classified Information Procedures Act sets forth separate procedures to be followed in the event that the 
Government believes matters relating to classified information may arise in connection with the prosecution.  See 18 
U.S.C. app. 3 §§ 1 et seq. 
Case 1:22-cr-00251-LJL   Document 19   Filed 05/20/22   Page 2 of 3

3 
 
SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated: May 20, 2022 
         
 
New York, New York 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         _______________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
                          LEWIS J. LIMAN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       United States District Judge 
Case 1:22-cr-00251-LJL   Document 19   Filed 05/20/22   Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
003_ECF_19_gov.uscourts.nysd.579149.19.0.pdf
Size
129,492 bytes
SHA-256
77296592730f4a01c5b9421a5823dac46b2148b8b04c15ab6c0e1d3580bf8be0
Our copy
003_ECF_19_gov.uscourts.nysd.579149.19.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top