Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings East Bay Sanctuary v. Trump Amicus Brief — East Bay Sanctuary v. Trump

Court filing

Amicus Brief — East Bay Sanctuary v. Trump

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2018-12-05

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:18-cv-06810-JST · Doc. 75-1 · 2018-12-05 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Exhibit A 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 1 of 14

 
 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR ET AL.
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Shannon Minter (SBN 168907) 
Amy Whelan (SBN 215675) 
Julie Wilensky (SBN 271765) 
NATIONAL CENTER FOR  
LESBIAN RIGHTS 
870 Market Street, Suite 370 
San Francisco, CA 94102 
Tel.: (415) 392-6257 
Fax: (415) 392-8442 
sminter@nclrights.org 
awhelan@nclrights.org 
jwilensky@nclrights.org 
 
Attorneys for Amici Curiae 
National Center for Lesbian 
Rights et al. 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
EAST BAY SANCTUARY 
COVENANT, et al., 
 
 
 
                              Plaintiffs, 
                              
 
                              v. 
 
 
 
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,  
 
 
 
 
Defendants. 
Case No. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NATIONAL 
CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, 
CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA, EL/LA 
PARA TRANSLATINAS, GLBTQ LEGAL 
ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS, 
IMMIGRATION EQUALITY, LAMBDA 
LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND, 
INC., AND TRANSGENDER LAW 
CENTER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ 
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 
INJUNCTION 
 
Date:        December 19, 2018 
Time:       9:30 a.m. 
Dep’t:      Courtroom 9 
 
Judge:     Hon. Jon S. Tigar 
 
 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 2 of 14

 
- 1 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE 
The National Center for Lesbian Rights (“NCLR”) is a national nonprofit 
legal organization dedicated to protecting and advancing the civil rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, 
transgender, and queer people and their families through litigation, public policy advocacy, and 
public education. Since its founding in 1977, NCLR has played a leading role in securing fair 
and equal treatment for LGBTQ people and their families in cases across the country involving 
constitutional and civil rights. NCLR’s Immigration Project has provided free legal assistance 
since 1994 to thousands of LGBTQ immigrants nationwide through, among other services, direct 
representation in impact cases and individual asylum cases, as well as advocacy for immigration 
and asylum policy reform.  
NCLR is joined by additional amici Centro Legal de la Raza, El/La Para Translatinas, 
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Immigration Equality, Lambda Legal Defense & 
Education Fund, Inc., and Transgender Law Center. Statements of interest of each amicus are in 
the Appendix. 
Amici write to highlight the harm to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer 
(“LGBTQ”) asylum seekers that will result from the interim final rule barring asylum for 
individuals who enter the country while covered by a presidential proclamation suspending entry 
at the southern border (“the Rule”), and the President’s proclamation suspending the entry of 
individuals who cross between ports at the southern border (“the Proclamation”). See Aliens 
Subject to a Bar on Entry Under Certain Presidential Proclamations; Procedures for Protection 
Claims, 83 Fed. Reg. 55,934 (Nov. 9, 2018); Addressing Mass Migration Through the Southern 
Border of the United States, 83 Fed. Reg. 57,661 (Nov. 9, 2018). 
ARGUMENT 
I. 
THE RULE AND PROCLAMATION WILL CAUSE DIRECT AND 
IRREPARABLE HARM TO LGBTQ ASYLUM SEEKERS AT THE SOUTHERN 
BORDER. 
Amici respectfully submit this brief to assist the Court in analyzing the harms to 
Plaintiffs’ clients and the public interest that will result from the Rule and Proclamation, which 
will cause direct and irreparable harm to LGBTQ asylum seekers arriving at the southern border. 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 3 of 14

 
- 2 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Although asylum seekers come to the southern border from all over the world, many LGBTQ 
people are fleeing persecution based on their sexual orientation or gender identity in their home 
countries of Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Mexico. As this Court recognized in issuing 
a temporary restraining order, under the Rule and Proclamation, “[a]sylum seekers will be put at 
increased risk of violence and other harms at the border, and many will be deprived of 
meritorious asylum claims.” Dkt. No. 43 at 2. The Rule and Proclamation will cause irreparable 
harm to asylum seekers, especially those, including LGBTQ people, who are particularly 
vulnerable. In addition to facing violence and other persecution in their countries of origin, 
LGBTQ asylum seekers, especially those who are transgender or gender-nonconforming, risk 
violence and other serious harms at the southern border due to their gender identity or sexual 
orientation, and it is unsafe for them to remain in Mexico while they await processing and entry 
into the United States. The effect of the Rule and Proclamation is to foreclose a path to asylum 
for many LGBTQ refugees with meritorious claims, and to place an already vulnerable group at 
a significantly higher risk of violence and other harm.  
A. 
Many LGBTQ People Who Arrive at the Southern Border Are Fleeing 
Violence and Persecution in Their Countries of Origin. 
 
Many LGBTQ people who arrive at the southern border seeking refuge in the United 
States are fleeing violence and persecution based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. 
While asylum seekers at the southern border come from all over the world, many come from 
Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, known as the “Northern Triangle” countries of Central 
America. These countries are experiencing “epidemic” levels of violence, including gender-
based violence, and are among the most dangerous countries in the world.1 LGBTQ people in the 
Northern Triangle countries are “particularly exposed to violence,” which is “related intrinsically 
                            
1 United Nations High Comm’r for Refugees, Women on the Run 2 (2015), available at 
http://goo.gl/5AAS2Z; Silva Mathema, Ctr. for American Progress, They Are (Still) Refugees: 
People Continue to Flee Violence in Latin American Countries (June 1, 2018), at 
http://goo.gl/drFqu2. 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 4 of 14

 
- 3 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
to the multiple forms of discrimination that LGBTI2 people face in different spheres of their 
family and working life, as part of society more widely and institutionally, on the basis of their 
gender identity or sexual orientation.”3 In November 2018, Loly Mendez, a transgender woman 
who arrived at the southern border with a group of LGBTQ asylum seekers, told reporters that in 
her home country of El Salvador, she had received threats that if her breasts grew, “they would 
cut them off,” and that her best friend, also a transgender woman, had been murdered.4 Lady 
Perez, who began identifying as transgender at age five in her home country of Honduras, 
disclosed that her father disowned her, she was subject to insults and beatings, her boyfriend was 
killed, and she was warned to leave Honduras “or else.”5 Other LGBTQ individuals seeking 
asylum shared their experiences, including César Mejía, who experienced discrimination and 
was beaten in Honduras,6 Nehemias de Leon, who brought documents supporting his claims of 
persecution and said that returning to Guatemala “would be a death sentence,”7 and Christian, 
who was shot several times by members of a local gang in Guatemala because he is gay.8 Shanne 
Smith, a transgender woman from Honduras who arrived at the southern border with a group of 
LGBTQ asylum seekers earlier this year, told reporters she had been the victim of physical 
                            
2 This brief uses “LGBTQ” to refer to people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and 
queer, except when quoting sources that use other acronyms, such as “LGBTI” (lesbian, gay, 
bisexual, transgender, and intersex). 
3 Amnesty Int’l, No Safe Place: Salvadorans, Guatemalans, and Hondurans Seeking Asylum in 
Mexico Based on Their Sexual Orientation and/or Gender Identity 4 (Nov. 2017), available at 
http://goo.gl/Q7KPiq (footnotes omitted). 
4 Sonia Perez D., In Mexico Caravan, LGBTQ Migrants Stick Together for Safety, KQED News 
(Nov. 13, 2018), at http://goo.gl/yT9yoH.  
5 Id. 
6 Kaelyn Ford, Threat of Violence at Home Spurs LGBT Migrants on to the Border, ABC News 
(Nov. 17, 2018), at http://goo.gl/tWHLX4.  
7 Vanessa Romo, LGBT Splinter Group from Migrant Caravan Is the 1st to Arrive in Tijuana, 
NPR News (Nov. 13, 2018), at http://goo.gl/FDzkUg.   
8 Adolfo Flores, LGBT Members of the Caravan Went Ahead First to Dodge Danger and 
Discrimination, Buzzfeed News (Nov. 14, 2018), at https://goo.gl/1sbsf3.  
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 5 of 14

 
- 4 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
attacks in her home country,”9 and Steffany told reporters that as a transgender woman, she 
could not go back to Honduras because she would be killed.10  
The violence and discrimination these LGBTQ refugees experienced in their countries of 
origin are not isolated incidents. According to the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, 88 
percent of LGBTQ asylum seekers and refugees from the Northern Triangle interviewed in a 
study reported experiencing sexual and gender-based violence in their countries of origin.11 In 
Honduras, “sexual violence against LGBT individuals forces them into ‘internal displacement’ or 
to flee the country in search of international protection.”12 At least 264 LGBTQ people in 
Honduras have been killed since 2009, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 
(IACHR) has expressed concern about the “high levels of violence against transgender people.”13 
The IACHR has also received information that killings of LGBTQ people in Honduras tend to go 
unpunished due to discriminatory stereotypes among police.14 In Guatemala, police regularly 
extort LGBTQ people by waiting outside clubs and bars to demand protection money or 
payments to avoid jail, and gay and transgender people often experience police abuse.15 In El 
Salvador, the U.S. State Department has reported that public officials, including police, engaged 
in violence and discrimination against “sexual minorities,” and that 52 percent of transgender 
                            
9 Jorge Rivas, The Nightmare Isn’t Over for Trans Women on the Refugee Caravan, Splinter 
News (May 8, 2018), at http://goo.gl/rMzT1x. 
10 Ari Honarvar, Caravan Asylum Seekers Let in, but Their Harrowing Journey Continues, 
Rewire.News (May 4, 2018), at https://goo.gl/EU7HS7. 
11 Amnesty Int’l, No Safe Place, supra, at 7. 
12 Human Rights Watch, Honduras Events of 2017 (2018), at http://goo.gl/R5KzEg.  
13 Amnesty Int’l, No Safe Place, supra, at 9; Anastasia Moloney, “Terrorized at home,” Central 
America’s LGBT People to Flee for Their Lives; Report, Reuters (Nov. 27, 2017), at 
http://goo.gl/xcbeV6. 
14 Rachel Banning-Lover, Where Are the Most Difficult Places in the World to Be Gay or 
Transgender?, The Guardian (Mar. 1, 2017), at http://goo.gl/fbLa4D; see Inter-American 
Comm’n on Human Rights, Situation of Human Rights in Honduras ¶ 137 (2015), available at 
http://goo.gl/JdsYVd. 
15 U.S. Dep’t of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor, Guatemala 2013 Human 
Rights Report 22-23 (2014), available at http://goo.gl/35KPmm.  
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 6 of 14

 
- 5 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
people surveyed had suffered death threats or violence.16 According to Amnesty International, 
“high levels of impunity are common” in the Northern Triangle, and LGBTQ people “very rarely 
obtain justice when they report the serious attacks they have suffered,” which “perpetuates the 
circle of violence to which [they] are subjected and increases their lack of protection.”17 
B. 
LGBTQ Asylum Seekers at the Southern Border Are Not Safe Waiting in in 
Mexico. 
LGBTQ asylum seekers traveling by land to the southern border face a dangerous 
journey to the United States involving a high risk of violence, including sexual assault. Refugees 
from El Salvadpor, Guatemala, and Honduras who are transgender or gender-nonconforming are 
particularly susceptible to attack and harm, as they are “exposed to gender-based violence at 
every point in their journey in search of protection.”18 LGBTQ people face severe persecution in 
Mexico, and LGBTQ refugees are especially vulnerable, in particular near the border with the 
United States. 
1. 
LGBTQ People Face Persecution and Violence in Mexico, and Refugees 
Are Especially Vulnerable. 
Violence against LGBTQ people in Mexico has increased in recent years. Mexico is not a 
safe place for LGBTQ people, particularly for those who are transgender or gender-
nonconforming, and for those who are also at intense risk due to their indigenous or racial 
identities.19 LGBTQ people, especially transgender women and others who are gender-
nonconforming, face violence and persecution in Mexico, and are often forced to seek protection 
outside of the country.20 Violence against the LGBTQ community, particularly against 
                            
16 U.S. Dep’t of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor, El Salvador 2016 Human 
Rights Report 4, 27–28 (2017), available at http://goo.gl/UNhcsc. 
17 Amnesty Int’l, No Safe Place, supra, at 18. 
18 Id. at 5. 
19 Kate Morrissey, Should Asylum Seekers Heading to the U.S. Stay in Mexico?, San Diego 
Union Tribune (May 21, 2018), at https://goo.gl/ELYFxH.   
20 Carolina Romero, Violence Against Mexcico’s Transgender Community Goes Unpunished, El 
Universal (Oct. 16, 2018), at http://goo.gl/tRbnd2; Human Rights First, Is Mexico Safe for 
Refugees and Asylum Seekers? (Nov. 2018), available at https://goo.gl/LmVvwt. 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 7 of 14

 
- 6 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
transgender women, has increased throughout Mexico since the recognition of marriage for 
same-sex couples,21 and nearly 200 transgender women have been murdered since 2016.22 While 
refugees generally face “acute risks of kidnapping, disappearance, sexual assault, trafficking, and 
other grave harms” in Mexico, LGBTQ refugees face a heightened, targeted risk due to their 
gender identity or sexual orientation.23 The UNHCR reported that two-thirds of LGBTQ asylum 
seekers and refugees coming from the Northern Triangle who were interviewed in a study in 
2016 reported suffering sexual and gender-based violence in Mexico.24 
In recent weeks, a group of LGBTQ asylum seekers from the Northern Triangle who 
arrived at the southern border described their acute susceptibility to discrimination and violence 
along their journey, including from other asylum seekers. After experiencing discriminatory 
treatment by other travelers and local residents, a group of LGBTQ refugees from Central 
America split off in Mexico City from a larger group traveling by land to the Southern border.25 
They explained, “[w]e traveled together to care for each other, not only from the violence of the 
state and criminal organizations, but also from the violence from civilians migrating with us.”26 
Fearful of being violently attacked, they “stick by each other’s sides 24 hours a day, walking and 
sleeping in a group and even using the buddy system for going to the bathroom.”27 A gay asylum 
seeker from Honduras, César Mejía, described instances of LGBTQ people being denied food 
and access to showers by other asylum seekers or local groups providing aid,28 and Lady Perez, a 
                            
21 Cornell Univ. Law School LGBT Clinic & Transgender Law Center, Report on Human Rights 
Conditions of Transgender Women in Mexico 4 (May 2016), available at http://goo.gl/KUe1dz.  
22 Romero, supra. 
23Human Rights First, Is Mexico Safe, supra; see Amnesty Int’l, No Safe Place, supra, at 20.  
24 Amnesty Int’l, No Safe Place, supra, at 20; see also United Nations High Comm’r for 
Refugees, supra, at 7 (noting that transgender women refugees from Mexico, El Salvador, and 
Honduras experienced gender-based violence and lack of police protection, and that being 
transgender “further exacerbated the level of violence they experienced”). 
25 Romo, supra; Maya Srikrishnan, Border Report: A Caravan Within the Caravan Has Arrived 
in Tijuana, Voice of San Diego (Nov. 12, 2018), at http://goo.gl/1BLzhf.  
26 Id. 
27 Perez D., supra. 
28 Romo, supra.  
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 8 of 14

 
- 7 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
transgender asylum seeker from Honduras, described how she and other transgender women had 
experienced harassment by “many men” in the group.29 
2. 
LGBTQ Asylum Seekers Also Face Heightened Risks of Violence While 
Waiting at the Border to Present Their Claims, and They Cannot Safely 
Remain in Mexico. 
LGBTQ asylum seekers face a heightened risk of violence and exploitation as they await 
permission by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (“CBP”) to present their claims at ports of entry. 
In recent months, immigration authorities have been processing limited numbers of asylum 
seekers each day, resulting in significant backlogs and forcing asylum seekers to wait days, 
weeks, or even months to present their claims to an immigration officer.30 Asylum seekers turned 
back from a point of entry have been attacked, raped, kidnapped, and trafficked by cartel 
members waiting outside ports of entry, who have increased their surveillance and control 
around border crossings and see asylum seekers as easy targets.31  
LGBTQ asylum seekers turned away from points of entry at the southern border have 
been subjected to additional human rights abuses in Mexico, as Plaintiff Al Otro Lado and 
Amnesty International have documented.32 In April and May 2018, a group of transgender 
asylum seekers from Central America who had arrived as part of a large group of others seeking 
refuge were repeatedly turned away from the San Ysidro point of entry.33 On April 30, 2018, the 
                            
29 Perez D., supra. 
30 Dara Lind, The US Has Made Migrants at the Border Wait Months to Apply for Asylum, Vox 
(Nov. 28, 2018), at http://goo.gl/5LEyty; see Dep’t of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector 
General, Special Review – Initial Observations Regarding Family Separation Issues Under the 
Zero Tolerance Policy 6 (Sept. 27, 2018), available at http://goo.gl/fFZbKM (acknowledging 
“backlog”); see also Amnesty Int’l, Americas: US Government Endangers Asylum Seekers with 
Unlawful Policies (Nov. 26, 2018), available at http://goo.gl/Qty5CE (describing visit to 
temporary shelter where U.S. authorities have forced thousands “to wait in Tijuana for weeks or 
months before allowing them to request asylum at the border”). 
31 See Human Rights First, Crossing the Line: U.S. Border Agents Illegally Reject Asylum 
Seekers, 16-19 (May 2017), available at http://goo.gl/HZYSUp. 
32 Ari Honarvar, LGBTQ Asylum Seekers Face Danger at the United States-Mexico Border, Teen 
Vogue (May 15, 2018), at http://goo.gl/cXk4yd; Amnesty Int’l, USA: “You Don’t Have Any 
Rights Here”: Illegal Pushbacks, Arbitrary Detention & Ill-Treatment of Asylum-Seekers in the 
United States 23 (2018), available at https://goo.gl/SpZw6M. 
33 Id. 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 9 of 14

 
- 8 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
morning after the refugees were first turned away by U.S. Customs and Border Control, two 
transgender women from the group were detained by municipal police for more than 24 hours, 
along with other transgender women who had been separately taken into custody, and one 
woman was beaten and injured.34 On May 6, 2018, a group of six armed men attacked and 
robbed a shelter where 11 LGBTQ asylum seekers were staying, setting the door on fire.35 The 
attackers returned a few hours later and shouted homophobic slurs at the asylum seekers, 
threatening to kill them if they did not leave the neighborhood.36 After receiving these death 
threats, the group of 11 LGBTQ asylum seekers, which included unaccompanied minors, 
returned to the San Ysidro point of entry to request asylum.37 CBP officials turned them away, 
claiming they lacked capacity to receive the group’s asylum claims.38 
C. 
The Rule and Proclamation Cause Direct and Irreparable Harm to LGBTQ 
Asylum Seekers by Foreclosing Access to Asylum and Subjecting Them to an 
Increased Risk of Violence and Harm in Mexico. 
Given the well-documented persecution and violence facing LGBTQ asylum seekers in 
their home countries and on the Mexico side of the border, those who need to reach safety as 
soon as possible often feel compelled to enter the United States outside of a port of entry.39 The 
Rule and Proclamation foreclose asylum for a refugee who enters the United States along the 
southern border other than at a port of entry. See 83 Fed. Reg. at 55,952; Proclamation. This 
directly and irreparably harms LGBTQ asylum seekers, a group that Amnesty International has 
described as having “special protection needs.”40 Under the Rule and Proclamation, many 
LGBTQ asylum seekers will be foreclosed from bringing asylum claims, even if their claims 
would otherwise be granted. See, e.g., Avendano-Hernandez v. Lynch, 800 F.3d 1072, 1080-82 
                            
34 Id. 
35 Id. 
36 Id. 
37 Id. 
38 Id. 
39 See, e.g., Dep’t of Homeland Security, supra, at 7 (noting “evidence that limiting the volume 
of asylum-seekers entering at ports of entry leads some . . . who would otherwise seek legal entry 
into the United States to cross the border illegally”). 
40 Amnesty Int’l, Americas: Stuck at the Door 8 (Nov. 2018), available at http://goo.gl/biCA9h.  
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 10 of 14

 
- 9 - 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(9th Cir. 2015) (holding that a transgender woman could not be deported to Mexico due to the 
high likelihood she would experience torture). This harm is both direct and irreparable, and the 
balance of equities and public interest tilts decisively in favor of enjoining the Rule and 
Proclamation.41 To hold otherwise would greatly harm the most vulnerable asylum seekers, 
including those who are LGBTQ, who face persecution and violence in their countries of origin 
and at the southern border, and who cannot safely remain in Mexico while they wait to present 
their claims at a point of entry. 
CONCLUSION 
For the reasons above, Amici urge the Court to grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary 
Injunction. 
 
Dated: December 5, 2018 
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL CENTER FOR  
LESBIAN RIGHTS 
 
 
 
By:  /s Julie Wilensky 
 
Shannon Minter 
Amy Whelan 
Julie Wilensky 
NATIONAL CENTER FOR  
LESBIAN RIGHTS 
870 Market Street, Suite 370 
San Francisco, CA 94102 
Tel.: (415) 392-6257 
Fax: (415) 392-8442 
 
Attorneys for Amici Curiae 
National Center for Lesbian 
Rights et al.
                            
41 In addition, as the Court found in its order granting a temporary restraining order, refugees 
who violate the rule are placed in expedited removal proceedings, where they will receive “far 
fewer procedural protections.” Dkt. 43 at 31 (citing 83 Fed. Reg. at 55,943 and Vasquez v. 
Holder, 635 F.3d 563, 566 (1st Cir. 2011)). Further, a grant of asylum confers important benefits 
not provided by withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, 
such as the ability to proceed through the process with immediate family members and a 
pathway to citizenship. Id. (citing 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(b)(3), 1159(b)-(c), 1427(a)). 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 11 of 14

 
App. 1 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPENDIX OF ADDITIONAL AMICI 
Centro Legal de la Raza (“Centro Legal”) was founded in 1969 to provide culturally 
and linguistically appropriate legal aid services to low-income residents of Oakland’s Fruitvale 
District and the greater Bay Area. Centro Legal’s Immigration Program provides legal 
representation and consultations to detained and non-detained immigrants, refugees, and 
asylum-seekers throughout Northern California. Annually, Centro Legal de la Raza advises 
and/or represents hundreds of individuals seeking relief before the immigration courts, Board 
of Immigration Appeals, and the Court of Appeals. As Centro Legal represents and provides 
assistance to many asylum-seekers and people seeking protection-based relief due to harm 
suffered or feared based on gender identity and sexual orientation, it has a substantial interest in 
the present case. 
El/La Para TransLatinas (“El/La”) is an organization for transgender Latinas 
(“TransLatinas”) that works to build collective vision and action to promote the survival of 
TransLatinas and improve their quality of life in the San Francisco Bay Area. El/La Para 
TransLatinas provides individual case management services, mental health counseling referrals, 
a food program, workshops, and community networking activities. El/La also focuses on anti-
violence work and seeks to promote the overall safety and well-being of TransLatinas in the 
Bay Area. 
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (“GLAD”) is a Boston-based, non-profit legal 
organization that engages in litigation, public policy advocacy, and education to create a just 
society free of discrimination based on gender identity and expression, HIV status, and sexual 
orientation. GLAD has litigated as party counsel or amici in federal court in various civil rights 
cases involving LGBTQ people, including marriage and DOMA, the transgender military ban, 
whether HIV is a “disability,” the scope of discrimination “because of sex,” criminal appeals, 
affirmative action, the scope of free speech and free exercise claims, and asylum cases for 
LGBTQ people. 
Immigration Equality is a national nonprofit organization providing free legal services 
and advocacy for indigent lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (“LGBTQ”) 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 12 of 14

 
App. 2 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
immigrants. Through its in-house attorneys and nationwide network of pro bono partners, 
Immigration Equality presently represents over six hundred LGBTQ and HIV-positive 
individuals in affirmative and defensive asylum, withholding of removal and related applications 
and proceedings. In addition to providing direct representation to LGBTQ asylum seekers, 
Immigration Equality offers assistance, support and training to other attorneys, publishes a 
comprehensive manual on the preparation of asylum claims related to sexual orientation and 
gender identity, and provides training on the adjudication of LGBTQ asylum cases to Asylum 
Officers within the Department of Homeland Security. Through its work, Immigration Equality 
has developed substantial expertise in the proper application of the United States immigration 
laws to LBGTQ asylum seekers and their claims. For these reasons, Immigration Equality has an 
urgent and direct interest in the outcome of this case. 
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. is the nation’s oldest and largest 
nonprofit legal organization committed to achieving full recognition of the civil rights of lesbian, 
gay, bisexual, and transgender people and people living with HIV through impact litigation, 
education, and public policy work. Lambda Legal actively litigates and advocates for LGBTQ 
and HIV-affected immigrants and asylum seekers, and its work has helped establish important 
immigration jurisprudence. See, e.g., Velasquez-Banegas v. Lynch, 846 F.3d 258 (7th Cir. 2017) 
(discussing discrimination and persecution against people living with HIV/AIDS and LGBTQ 
people in Honduras); Hernandez-Montiel v. INS, 225 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2000) (recognizing that 
individuals may be protected against removal to countries in which they would face persecution 
based on their sexual orientation); Pitcherskaia v. INS, 118 F.3d 641 (9th Cir. 1997) (ruling that 
lesbians and gay men who suffer violence in their homelands need not prove the malicious intent 
of persecutors claiming that they act only to “cure” gay people such as with forced psychiatric 
hospitalization, electroshock therapy, or drugs). 
Transgender Law Center (“TLC”) is the largest national trans-led organization 
advocating self-determination for all people. Grounded in legal expertise and committed to 
racial justice, TLC employs a variety of community-driven strategies to keep transgender and 
gender nonconforming (“TGNC”) people alive, thriving, and fighting for liberation. TLC 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 13 of 14

 
App. 3 
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NCLR 
ET AL. 
 
CASE NO. 18-cv-06810-JST 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
believes that TGNC people hold the resilience, brilliance, and power to transform society at its 
root, and that the people most impacted by the systems TLC fights must lead this work. TLC 
builds power within TGNC communities, particularly communities of color and those most 
marginalized, and lays the groundwork for a society in which all people can live safely, freely, 
and authentically regardless of gender identity or expression. TLC works to achieve this goal 
through leadership development and by connecting TGNC people to legal resources. It also 
pursues impact litigation and policy advocacy to defend and advance the rights of TGNC 
people, transform the legal system, minimize immediate threats and harms, and educate the 
public about issues impacting our communities. 
Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST   Document 75-1   Filed 12/05/18   Page 14 of 14

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.334557.75.1.pdf
Size
192,250 bytes
SHA-256
4a37a1e2229a8b4bb6b9bd6a897420b3ab963a600a4a410687c23ed9030d4988
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.334557.75.1.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top