Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. Declaration — East Bay Sanctuary v. Trump (Doc. 71-8, filed 2018-12-04)

Court filing

Declaration — East Bay Sanctuary v. Trump (Doc. 71-8, filed 2018-12-04)

Summary

The Declaration of Nicole Ramos, filed 12/04/18 as Document 71-8 in East Bay Sanctuary v. Trump, Case No. 4:18-cv-06810-JST, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Ramos states that she is the Project Director for the Border Rights Project of Al Otro Lado, a nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles. She states that, because of the interim final rule, Al Otro Lado has been and will be forced to divert substantial resources from its core mission to address the basic needs of unaccompanied children in Tijuana. The declaration also describes conditions at the Benito Juarez Sports Complex and the opening of a shelter facility in Ejido Matamoros. The five-page declaration is dated December 2018, and the signature block names Nicole Ramos.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2018-12-04

Cite this document

“Declaration — East Bay Sanctuary v. Trump.” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:18-cv-06810-JST, Doc. 71-8, filed 2018-12-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/east-bay-sanctuary-v-trump/2018-12-04-declaration-nicole-ramos-dkt-71-8/, SHA-256 49d394f3bdc04d6581d9b5607bb54a51d04bd1acf85e9a51aa49bd3ff20c3b04.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST Document 71-8 Filed 12/04/18 Page i1of5

DECLARATION OF NICOLE RAMOS
I, Nicole Ramos, declare under the penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746:

1. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge except where I have indicated
otherwise. If called as a witness, I would testify competently and truthfully to these
matters.

2. IamaU.S. licensed attorney practicing in the area of immigration law and human rights.
[ am barred by the State of New York, and I am a former Assistant Federal Public
Defender. I am over the age of 18.

3. Iam the Project Director for the Border Rights Project of Al Otro Lado, a nonprofit
organization based in Los Angeles.

4. My colleagues and I currently represent about twenty unaccompanied children who wish
to apply for asylum in the United States.

5. Because of the interim final rule, Al Otro Lado has been and, without an injunction will
be, forced to divert substantial resources away from our core mission of providing legal
services to individuals and families with children, to instead address the basic needs of
unaccompanied children, who are our most vulnerable clients and who are presenting the
most urgent humanitarian concerns in Tijuana. As detailed below, Mexican officials are
not permitting unaccompanied minors — including numerous minors we represent — to
enter the United States at ports of entry, causing an enormous concentration of vulnerable
minors facing danger and desperation in Tijuana. The interim final rule categorically
prevents our clients and others from obtaining asylum should they cross between ports of
entry, and thus prevents children from crossing out of necessity between ports to seek
asylum. Absent an injunction of the rule’s operation, therefore, the humanitarian crisis in
Tijuana — and the corresponding, overwhelming demands on our time and resources to

assist these minors — will escalate and divert our focus from our core mission.

Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST Document 71-8 Filed 12/04/18 Page 2 of5

. Every one of the children Al Otro Lado is representing has articulated to me or a member
of our staff an intent to apply for asylum in the United States. In my opinion, most of the
children have strong claims. Several of the children are LGBT and have faced severe
persecution as a result. Others have been forced to engage in child labor. Some have
family members who have been targeted for violence, putting the children at serious risk
because of their family relationships. One child from Honduras was forced to watch the
murder of his cousin; after that, he fled because he understood his life was at risk because
of his family relationship. Several of the children fled after corrupt police perceived
them to be informants. Should the interim final rule not be enjoined, they would be stuck
in Tijuana, unable to be processed at a port of entry there, yet unable to cross between
ports to seek asylum.

. Advising and assisting our unaccompanied minor clients has been particularly time-
consuming and emotionally draining. It has required staff on the Border Rights Project to
shift our focus away from our core mission of providing legal services in order to focus
almost exclusively on providing extensive non-legal services to unaccompanied minors.

. As my colleague, Erika Pinheiro, explained in her supplemental declaration executed on
November 16, 2018, and filed in this case, these unaccompanied children have no way to
apply for asylum in the United States. Prior to the TRO, and without an injunction in
force, they will be categorically ineligible for asylum if they enter between ports. They
also are not being allowed to apply for asylum at ports of entry for the reasons detailed in
the declaration.

. Because unaccompanied children cannot apply on their own for asylum at ports of entry,
on November 21, nine Al Otro Lado legal observers escorted eight unaccompanied

children directly to the San Ysidro port of entry so that they could try to present

10.

i,

12.

13,

Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST Document 71-8 Filed 12/04/18 Page 3of5

themselves to CBP and express their desire to seek asylum. This effort required many
hours of preparation to advise the children on what to expect and orient the legal
observers who would accompany them to the port of entry. Although we were able to
accompany these nine, we cannot accompany all children to the border due to resource
constraints.

Despite our efforts, Mexican officials apprehended two of the children near the end of the
line—a 17-year-old from Honduras and a 15-year-old from Mexico—before we reached
the port of entry. These two children were detained by the Mexican immigration
authorities for five days. They were released only after I spent dozens of hours over the
course of five days negotiating with the Mexican government to facilitate their

release. Both were severely traumatized as a result of this experience.

Our staff has worked many more hours than usual to address the non-legal needs of our
unaccompanied minor clients, including helping to find them accommodations and
coordinating with a local youth shelter to provide transportation. Immediately after the
interim final rule was announced, up to 15 children at a time were waiting in our office
around the clock while we arranged their accommodations. Our office often felt more
like a daycare center than a legal services organization. Because our office was being
used to shelter our unaccompanied minor clients, we could not spend as much time with
our other clients.

After these clients moved to a local youth shelter, one of our attorneys spent several
hours purchasing cell phones to make sure the children could communicate with us. That
attorney’s time would otherwise have been Spent on casework.

Al Otro Lado has also spent countless hours attending to the emotional and mental health

needs of our unaccompanied minor clients. Some of them have expressed suicidal

14.

15,

16.

17.

Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST Document 71-8 Filed 12/04/18 Page 4of5

thoughts. Currently, two of our staff members spend about half their time addressing the
needs of our unaccompanied child clients.

Conditions for asylum seekers on the Mexican side of the border have become
increasingly intolerable.

The Tijuana government opened up the Benito Juarez Sports Complex (“Benito Juarez’)
as a temporary shelter/camp for the migrants. I have visited Benito Juarez on several
occasions. I have witnessed incredibly squalid conditions, with many migrants, including
pregnant women and children, sleeping in the dirt with only plastic sheeting to protect
them from the elements. I saw migrants sleeping in shelters made from branches that had
fallen from the trees. Many migrants were suffering from respiratory illnesses, as
evidenced by their persistent coughs.

More than 5,800 migrants had taken shelter at this outdoor facility by the end of
November. This figure represents about three times the capacity of the facility. Migrants
formed hours-long lines to get food and water, and migrants reported that there was not
enough food for everyone. People do not have basic necessities, including diapers,
blankets, or warm clothes.

The safety of the migrants at the camp is of grave concern. Recently, twenty migrants
were kidnapped outside the sports complex. Despite promises of paid work, these
individuals were transported to Sonora, Mexico, where they were held against their will
for several days. During this period, they were forced to clean blood and biological
waste from a warehouse. They finally escaped through a window and made their way to
a shelter, where many members of the group were recaptured. The kidnappers are
currently seeking to extort money from the victims’ families. One of the victims was

released after someone paid his ransom. He is currently in hiding in Tijuana.

18.

Case 4:18-cv-06810-JST Document 71-8 Filed 12/04/18 Page 5of5

On Thursday, November 29, the government opened an indoor shelter facility in Ejido
Matamoros, a very dangerous neighborhood. It is approximately a 30-minute drive from
the San Ysidro port of entry. On foot, the journey would take about 30 hours. Initially,
migrants had the option to stay at Benito Juarez or move to the new facility. Many were
reluctant to move due to concerns about safety and the difficulty of making repeated trips
to the port of entry to see what number was being called from “the list.” As of Friday,
November 30, local officials announced that they would be removing all portable toilets
and cease providing services at Benito Juarez. Even with no water, electricity, and scarce
food, there were still several hundred migrants at Benito Juarez as of December 2, 2018.
Even with the addition of the new shelter, the available space remains inadequate, with
the result that many migrants are sleeping in tents or outside in various locations around
Tijuana.

Executed this __ day of December 2018.

7 Nicole Ramos

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.334557.71.8.pdf
Size
2,837,794 bytes
SHA-256
49d394f3bdc04d6581d9b5607bb54a51d04bd1acf85e9a51aa49bd3ff20c3b04
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.334557.71.8.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top