CRS Insight IN11247 — COVID-19 Direct Payments (Second Round) FAQ

Record facts

Full text

CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
 
 INSIGHTi 
COVID-19 and Direct Payments to 
Individuals: Considerations on Using 
Advanced Refundable Credits as Economic 
Stimulus 
March 17, 2020 
In response to concerns about an economic slowdown stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, 
policymakers have been considering a broad array of policy options. Some are targeted directly toward 
the individuals and industries that may be most affected. Others would more broadly seek to stimulate the 
economy. Among this latter category of policies, some have suggested a payroll tax cut, while others have 
proposed direct cash payments—“recovery rebates”—to virtually all households. One mechanism to 
provide cash payments relatively quickly is to create a new refundable tax credit and then advance it to 
households before they would otherwise claim it on their income tax returns. A similar policy was enacted 
most recently in 2008. This Insight addresses some common questions about advanced refundable tax 
credits. 
What is a refundable tax credit? 
Tax credits reduce income taxes owed dollar for dollar; each dollar in tax credit is a one-dollar subtraction 
from income tax liability. Nonrefundable credits are limited by the taxpayer’s income tax liability, while 
refundable credits are not. Hence, taxpayers with little to no income tax liability—including many low-
income taxpayers—can benefit from refundable tax credits. Refundable tax credits targeted toward low-
income individuals and families are estimated to have relatively large stimulative effects compared to 
other policies—a large “bang for the buck”—because low-income populations tend to spend these 
amounts quickly. Some economists were concerned that the 2008 credit would not be effective because a 
lump-sum payment might be saved rather than spent. Empirical evidence based on studying a prior rebate 
found, however, that the rebate was largely spent. 
Current refundable tax credits—the earned income tax credit (EITC) and the refundable portion of the 
child credit—benefit low-income families that include workers and children. These tax credits are 
received once a year when federal income tax returns are filed. Tax credit amounts are primarily based on 
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11247 

Congressional Research Service 
2 
  
the taxpayer’s earned income and number of qualifying children in the prior year (e.g., an EITC received 
in 2020 when 2019 tax returns are filed is based on 2019 income and family composition).  
What does “advancing” a tax credit mean? 
Advancing a tax credit effectively means issuing a tax credit for a given year before the tax return for that 
year has been filed (and before income taxes for that year have been calculated). The 2008 recovery 
rebates for individuals included in P.L. 110-185 were refundable tax credits against 2008 income taxes. 
However, taxpayers did not need to wait to file their 2008 income tax returns in early 2009 to receive 
these credits. Instead, the law allowed the IRS to advance these credits in 2008, basing the advanced 
amount on income and family structure information from tax returns filed for the 2007 tax year. The 
credit equaled up to $600 per person ($1,200 for joint filers), with an additional $300 per dependent child. 
Lower-income taxpayers tended to receive a smaller credit, while the credit phased out for taxpayers with 
incomes over $75,000 ($150,000 for married joint filers). 
Advancing tax credits based on prior data can pose challenges if any of the parameters used to calculate 
the credit—like income and number of children—change from these prior values. For example, if a 
taxpayer’s 2019 income is significantly greater than their income at the end of 2020, an advanced credit 
estimated based on 2019 income may be larger than what a taxpayer is ultimately eligible for in 2020. 
(Even if an advanced payment is a fixed amount per person [does not vary by income], the final amount 
can still vary if family structure changes during the year.) This could result in taxpayers having to pay 
back the excess credit when they file their 2020 income tax returns (in early 2021). Insofar as this is a 
concern, policymakers can limit how much taxpayers have to pay back (for example, as is done with the 
advanced premium assistance tax credit), or they can bar repayments of excess advanced payments 
entirely, as was done with the 2008 recovery rebates.  
How long would it take for the IRS to begin issuing 
advanced credits? 
Past experiences with the IRS issuing advanced refundable tax credits may provide some guide on how 
long these policies take to implement. On January 28, 2008, H.R. 5140, which included the 2008 recovery 
rebates for individuals, was introduced in the House. Two weeks later, on February 13, 2008, it was 
enacted as P.L. 110-185. Sixty-two days later, the IRS began issuing the first one-time rebate checks. 
More than 120 million taxpayers received their payments by mid-July 2008. Taxpayers who had filed 
their 2007 tax returns and received a refund via direct deposit also received the 2008 recovery rebates via 
direct deposit. Otherwise, paper checks were mailed out to taxpayers using address information from 
2007 income tax returns. A 2007 tax return had to be filed to receive a recovery rebate check. Those who 
did not receive a recovery rebate check could claim the benefit when filing a 2008 income tax return.  
How many individuals could receive an advanced 
refundable tax credit? 
One concern that some have about using the federal tax system to administer direct cash payments to 
households is that not all individuals in the United States file income tax returns—either because their 
income is below the filing threshold or because they are not complying with federal tax laws. A 2017 
CBO analysis estimated that of 292.6 million individuals who could be included on a federal income tax 
return (as the taxpayer, spouse, or dependent), 251.9 million were actually included—or 86%. The study 
estimated that the greatest share of nonfilers were lower-income individuals, especially those 65 years or 
older. As was noted above, the 2008 recovery rebate could be claimed by taxpayers who did not file a

Congressional Research Service 
3 
IN11247 · VERSION 2 · NEW 
2007 tax return. These nonfilers—which included many low-income individuals and seniors—could 
claim the credit on their 2008 returns when they filed them in 2009. The federal income tax system is 
limited in its ability to provide cash assistance to individuals quickly, particularly when those individuals 
are nonfilers.  
  
 
 
Author Information 
 
Margot L. Crandall-Hollick 
Acting Section Research Manager 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

File and source

File

IN11247-covid2-direct-payments-faq.pdf

Size

549,429 bytes

SHA-256

5856d25a22c0fbcf45bb5de239b65fd83d0f5e0521d6d31918ce0758aafd39e2

Our copy

IN11247-covid2-direct-payments-faq.pdf

Original

No public link identified.