Court filing
Counsel Letter Requesting Recusal — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)
Filed August 25, 2021 in Childrens Health Defense v. Rutgers; one of 33 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Filed | 2021-08-25 |
|---|
No. 3:21-cv-15333-ZNQ-TJB · Doc. 8 · 2021-08-25 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
GOMEZ LLC Julio C. Gomez, Esq.
ATTORNEY AT LAW 908.789.1080 Tel
908.789.1081 Fax
jgomez@gomezllc.com
1451 COOPER ROAD
SCOTCH PLAINS, NJ 07076
August 25, 2021
VIA CM-ECF
Hon. Zahid N. Quarishi, U.S.D.J.
United States District Court, District of New Jersey
Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse
402 East State Street
Trenton, NJ 08608
Re:
Children’s Health Defense, Inc. et al. v. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, et al.
Civ. Case No. 21-15333 (United States District Court, District of New Jersey
Dear Judge Quarishi:
I represent the Plaintiffs in the above-referenced matter against Rutgers, The State University of
New Jersey, its Biomedical and Health Sciences School and various university officials.
Defendants have been served and counsel for defendants have not entered an appearance yet.
On August 18, 2021, Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson reassigned this case to Your Honor. (Dkt. 7)
It has been brought to my firm's attention that, Your Honor is currently an Adjunct Professor at
Rutgers Law School. See https://law.rutgers.edu/directory/view/13820. Since Your Honor may not
be aware yet of this reassignment, I am compelled to bring this matter to Your Honor’s attention.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §455(a), concerning the disqualification of judges of the United States,
”[a]ny justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any
proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” The inherent conflict that
your position at Rutgers presents, and the reasonable possibility that your impartiality might be
questioned by the public if Your Honor presides over a matter against Rutgers, in a case of
considerable public importance, compels me to respectfully request that Your Honor consider
recusal.
Since it is possible that Your Honor may not have been made aware of the reassignment of this
case yet, and the inherent conflict in what is most likely an inadvertence by the Chief Judge, rather
than filing a Motion to Compel recusal or for disqualification, I wanted to give Your Honor and
the Court an opportunity to address this. Thank you for your prompt attention and time to this
delicate matter.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Julio C. Gomez
Julio C. Gomez
Case 3:21-cv-15333-ZNQ-TJB Document 8 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 115File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.480171.8.0.pdf
- Size
- 114,360 bytes
- SHA-256
- 153d2c3a73fee0e87cb8bc8c52aa4a8953a95efeb87df34bbf25efe651b0c85e
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.480171.8.0.pdf
- Original
- archive.org