Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings No. 3:23-cr-00386 (United States District Court for the Southern District of California) Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing on Behalf of Defendant Sandu,Constantin Bobi — No. 3:23-cr-00386 (Dkt. 46, S.D. Cal.)

Court filing

Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing on Behalf of Defendant Sandu,Constantin Bobi — No. 3:23-cr-00386 (Dkt. 46, S.D. Cal.)

Summary

A memorandum in aid of sentencing filed September 28, 2023 on behalf of defendant Constantin Bobi Sandu in Case No. 23CR0386-LAB in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Joseph T. Hitrec of First Call Legal Services, Inc., counsel for Sandu, states that under the plea agreement the offense level is 26, reducible to level 22, with Criminal History Category 1. The memorandum takes exception to the Probation recommendation of 72 months and argues for the sentence proposed in the plea agreement. It acknowledges that Sandu's gain was about $60.000.00 and cites Sandu's background in the Romani community of Romania, limited formal education and expected removal from the United States.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 28, 2023 in No. 3:23-cr-00386; one of 1 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2023-09-28

Cite this document

“Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing on Behalf of Defendant Sandu,Constantin Bobi — No. 3:23-cr-00386 (Dkt. 46, S.D. Cal.).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, No. 3:23-cr-00386, Doc. 46, filed 2023-09-28. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/casd-3-23-cr-00386/2023-09-28-memorandum-in-aid-of-sentencing-on-behalf-of-defendant-sandu-dkt-46/, SHA-256 54d6c8759bd606d57ddf551706d21b15c3a788c19db4e9c57a31da515f696545.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

tN

lee

Case 3:23-cr-00386-LAB Document 46 Filed 09/28/23 PagelD.251 Page 1of

First Call Legal Services, Inc.

600 W. Broadway Ste. 700

San Diego, Ca 92101

(760) 690-3999

Joseph T. Hitrec, Esq.

Email:immigration! 82@gmail.com

Attorney for Defendant SANDU, Constantin Bobi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITES STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 23CR0386-LAB
Plaintiff,
- MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING
_ ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT
: vee eds SANDU.CONSTANTIN BOBI
SANDU CONSTANTIN BOBI. DATE: NOVEMBER 20.2023
Defendant TIME:2:00PM

1.INTRODUCTION

Counsel for SANDU, Constantin Bobi (hereinafter Sandu) respectfully submits this
Memorandum to help the Honorable Court determine an appropriate sentence for his conviction
in the present case. As per the Plea Agreement, the present offence level is 26, reducible to level
22. His Criminal History is Category 1. Counsel for Defendant received the Presentence
Investigative Report (PIR) on September 15,2023. Counsel for Mr. Sandu takes exception to the
recommendation of Probation. on page 17, paragraph 95, that Mr. Sandu be sentenced to 72
months. This felony conviction will ultimately result in his Removal from the United States and
prohibit any future reentry. The brief benefit that he received from this misconduct has nullified

any further opportunity for him to be in this country.

MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT SANDU,CONSTANTIN
BOBIDATE: NOVEMBER 20,2023TIME:2:00PM - |


an

6

Case 3:23-cr-00386-LAB Document 46 Filed 09/28/23 PagelD.252 Page 2 of

We do not do not apologize for. nor excuse in any manner the seriousness of the offense
committed by Mr, Sandu. However, as discussed. the proposed sentence as per the Plea
Agreement, is along with any other conditions that the Court may deem appropriate- is no greatel
punishment than necessary to serve the ends of sentencing, and the interests of justice.
I]. FACTORS IN SUPPPORT OF THE PROPOSED SENTENCE

A. Nature of the Offense
Federal felonies are. by definition. serious offences. Mr. Sandu’s theft has been fully
acknowledged. NO elements of force. violence, intimidation, threats or coercion were involved.
Mr. Sandu fully acknowledges that his motive was personal benefit. Despite the number of
individuals and the amounts involved, it is acknowledged that Mr. Sandu’s gain was about
$60.000.00 Mr. Sandu used his money to help his family in Romania. Page 12, paragraph 54, of
the PIR details his life experience. He is a member of the Romani community. The term “gypsy”
is deemed pejorative by the Romani people and therefor is not used. The Romani have been
traditional persecuted through history. Romania did not abolish slavery until about 1875, and
slavery meant the Romani people. The Romani were thereafter subjected to a brutal serfdom. In
the 1930’s they were viciously persecuted, along with the Jewish community, by the Romanian
Fascist Iron Guards. During WWII General lon Antonescu. the fascist dictator of Romania,
colluded with Adolph Hitler, and subjected the Romani. along with the Jewish community, to
extermination in Auschwitz, Treblinka, Dachau, Majdanek. Sobibor among other places. After
WWII in the former Communist Czechoslovakia, tens of thousands of Romani women were
forcibly sterilized. Documentation for same has only recently become available. During the
communist era in Romania. if the Romani complained, they were subject to persecution. Mr.
Sandu’s home town of Pitesti was notorious for its prison where political prisoners were held in

MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT SANDU,CONSTANTIN
BOBIDATE: NOVEMBER 20.2023TIME:2:00PM - 2

O)


to

land

Case 3:23-cr-00386-LAB Document 46 Filed 09/28/23 PagelD.253 Page 3 of

deplorable conditions. The Romani community never had a Martin Luther King or Nelson
Mandela to advocate their rights. To this day, the Romani continued to be persecuted in
Romania, and the perpetrators of torture and persecution are very rarely sanctioned. The situat ion
of the Romani is unique enough that for purposes of Immigration Law they are deemed to be a
Particular Social Group See. Mihalev v. Ashcroft 388 F3d. 722 (9"" Cir. 2994). Attached hereto
as Exhibit “1 “is a seven-page report from Amnesty International which provides as succinct
overview of the suffering of the Romani.

B. Nature of the Offender
Mr. Sandu is a devoted husband and father of his children. PIR- Page 12. paragraphs 55 and 56.
He has very limited formal education as a result of the structural impediments in Romania
against his community. His opportunity for formal avenues of employment and advancement.
were. and remain, extremely limited. It was desperation rather than greed, that was the
controlling factor in this course of conduct. Mr. Sandu has fully accepted responsibility and has
displayed remorse for what occurred.

C. Mr. Sandu poses extremely low risk of reoffending.

1. Sentencing Commission Research

a. Zero Criminal History Points
Mr. Sandu has never been in trouble before either in the Unites States or elsewhere. The
Sentencing Commission notes “that first offenders are less culpable than other offenders. /1/ It
found that “sentence reductions for ‘first offenders’ are supported by the recidivism data and
would recognize their lower reoffending rates”
The Sentencing Commission has determined that criminal history points better forecast the risks
of re-offense than the Criminal History Category/2/. Offenders like Mr. Sandu with zero criminal

MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT SANDU,CONSTANTIN
BOBIDATE: NOVEMBER 20.2023TIME:2:00PM - 3


a

6

Case 3:23-cr-00386-LAB Document 46 Filed 09/28/23 PagelD.254 Page 4 of

history points recidivate just 11.7% of the time. Offenders with even one criminal history point
re-offend at almost twice that rate, 22.6%/3/

b. Other Demographic indicators
Recidivism rates are influenced most by a defendant's personal characteristics such as (1) family
ties and marital status (2) level of education (3) lack of substance abuse (4) history of
employment. Mr. Sandu presented a long history of strong family ties. He has no history of
abuse alcohol or drugs. As stated, his history of employment was mainly manual labor in
agriculture and other low level service work. This goes hand in hand with the fact that
educational opportunities were denied to him by the Romanian government and society.
Furthermore. recidivism rates decline relatively consistently as age increase.” from 35.5% of
offenders under age 21 to 12.7% over age 40. Mr. Sandu is now 34 years of age/4/
Larceny offenders studied by the Sentencing Commission recidivated around 19% of the time.
less often than most other groups of offenders. /5/
III.CONCLUSION
We recognize that respect for the law, and deterrence requires just punishment. Too harsh a
sentences fail to respect the law just as much as too lenient a sentence. It violates this statute
requiring the sentence to be no greater than necessary/6/
Given this case's singular circumstances. it is requested that Mr. Sandu be sentenced in

accordance with the Plea Agreement, and with such other conditions as the Court may deem

appropriate.
//
Hf
//

MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT SANDU,CONSTANTIN
BOBIDATE: NOVEMBER 20.2023TIME:2:00PM - 4


Case 3:23-cr-00386-LAB Document 46 Filed 09/28/23 PagelD.255 Page 5of

Date: O4(2%| 20%

Was

Joseph T. Hitrec
Attorhey at Law

O)

1.U.S.S.C. “recidivism and the First offender.” at 9 (Release 2, May 2004)
http://www.usse.gov/Research/Research Publications/Recidivism/200405 Recidivism F irst
offender.

2.U.S.S.C. “The Criminal History Computation,” at 7.

3.See “Recidivism and the First Offender,“at 13-14

4, U.S.S.C. “Criminal History Computation” at 12 and 28, Exhibit. 9 (showing recidivism rates
just 6.9% for offenders between 40 and 50 and in Criminal History !).

. See U.S.S.C., “Criminal history Computation” at 13.

In

. See Justice Anthony Kennedy. Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, February

IS

14.2007 (“Our sentences are too long. our sentences re too severe. our sentences are too

harsh...there is no compassion in the system. There’s no mercy in the system.”)

MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT SANDU,CONSTANTIN
BOBIDATE: NOVEMBER 20.2023 TIME:2:00PM - 5


Case 3:23-cr-00386-LAB Document 46 Filed 09/28/23 PagelD.256 Page 6 of

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing Memorandum in Aid of
Sentencing on behalf of SANDU, Constantin Bobi Case No.23CR0386LAB upon AUSA Jessica
A. Schulberg. and US Probation Officer Ms. Jill Johnson-Pogue by electronically filing the

foregoing with the Court using the electronic filing system.

First Call Legal Services Inc.

Joseph*T. Hitrec

MEMORANDUM IN AID OF SENTENCING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT SANDU,CONSTANTIN
BOBIDATE: NOVEMBER 20.2023TIME:2:00PM - 6

O)

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.755510.46.0.pdf
Size
1,532,818 bytes
SHA-256
54d6c8759bd606d57ddf551706d21b15c3a788c19db4e9c57a31da515f696545
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.755510.46.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top