Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Carl Delano Torjagbo Gand 303267 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard:… — Carl…

Court filing

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard:… — Carl Delano Torjagbo (Dkt. 113)

No. 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC · Doc. 113 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

                    Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC                  Document 113               Filed 09/12/24          Page 1 of 2
  MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S CRIMINAL MINUTES
  ARRAIGNMENT
  PLEA AND SENTENCE




                                                               Time in Court:    I               Hrs.
                                                                                                           IJ I     Mins.

      Filed in Open Court       Date:                          Time:                             Tape:       FTR
                                            q/11                               Jl:b~
  Magistrate Judge (presiding): Russell G. Vineyard                            Deputy Clerk:          Amanda Zarkowsky
                                                  "'
      CASE NO.
                           \: (Aa ce 11 ~ ~~2-            Defendant's Name:            -
                                                                                                Ca""\ be\ano 1nr,nahn           I
      AUSA:
                            Ji)h("\ D.+l't\, llins        Defendant's Attorney:                                                     J
                                                                                                V.VJ\ria\ ~i \as
      USPO                                                Type of Counsel: FDP
               INTERPRETER:
                                        I
               INITIAL APPEARANCE HEARING: ( } In This District                              Dft in custody? ( ) Yes        (   } No
               Due Process Protection Act Warning Given to Government's
               Counsel. Order on page 2.
r -            Defendant advised of right to counsel. (    ) WAIVER OF COUNSEL FILED.

               ORDER appointing Federal Defender Program as counsel. (               ) INITIAL APPEARANCE ONLY
           ORDER appointing                                                                       I as counsel.
           ORDER giving defendant                                                            days to employ counsel.
           Dft to pay attorney fees as follows:
                                                               I
           ~NFORMATION/INDICJ_~ENT FILED                                                     ( } WAIVER OF INDICTMENT FILED
                                                               /'                                                           ~




      V ... Copy information/indictment give to dft ( "1'Yes (          } No                 Read to dft? ( )Yes ~      no
           CONSENT TO TRIAL BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Misd/Petty) offense filed.
          I/                                .-
      V    ARRAIGNMENT HELD (               uperseding Indictment                            ( ) Dft's WAIVER of appearance filed.
           Arraignment continued to                                 @                       Request of ( ) Govt (       } Dft
           Dft failed to appear arraignment            Bench Warrant Issued:

      v    Dft enters PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. ( ) Dft stood mute; plea of Not Guilty entered. ( ) Waiver of appearance

           PLEA OF GUilTY/NOLO as to counts:

           ASSIGNED to District Judge                  Judge                                (    ) trial   ( ) arraignment/sentence
           ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge                Judge                                for pretrial proceedings.
           Estimated trial time:                                                                SHORT      MEDIUM      LONG
                 Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC                     Document 113                Filed 09/12/24           Page 2 of 2

 ARRAIGNMENT- Pg. 2                                                                       CASE NO.              2 Cl(_ /7 /
         CONSENT TO PRE-SENTENTCE INVESTI GATION filed. Referred to USPO for PSI and continued

         until                             at                                             for sentencing.

        Government's MOTION FOR DETENTION filed. Hearing set                              for

        Temporary commitment issued. Defendant remanded to custody of U.S. Marshals Service


BOND/PRETRIAL DETENTION HEARINGS
         PRETRIAL DETENTION HEARING HELD.
                                                        - - The Defendant does not contest detention at this time .
        BOND HEARING HELD.

        GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR DETENTION (                       ) GRANTED           (     ) DENIED        (       )WITHDRAWN
        WR ITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW.

        HEARING HELD on motion for reduction/ modification of bond.

        MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF BOND/ MODIFICATION OF BOND (                                    ) GRANTED       (     ) DENIED
        WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW.

        BOND SET AT

        NON-SURETY

        SURETY       (     ) Cash                    I ( ) Property                 I(          ) Corporate Surety
        SPECIAL CONDITIONS:



        BOND FILED; DEFENDANT RELEASE.

        BOND NOT EXCUTED. DEFENDANT TO REMAIN IN MARSHALS' CUSTODY.

        Defendant to remain on pretrial release under the terms and conditions set forth in the U.S.
        District Court for the District of


        WITNESSES:



        EXHBITS:




ORDER
           Pursuant to t he Due Process Protections Act, see Fed . R. Crim. P. 5(f), the government is directed to adhere to the disclosure
obligations set forth in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to provide all materials and information t hat are argua bly
favorable to the defendant in compliance with its ob ligations under Brady; Gig lio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); and thei r progeny.
Exculpat ory materia l as defined in Brady and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 434 (1995), shall be provided suffi ciently in adva nce
of trial to allow a defendant to use it effectively, and excu lpatory information is not limited to information that wou ld co nstitute
admissible evid ence.
          The failure of the government to comply with its Brady obl igations in a timely manner may result in seri ous conseq uences,
including, but not limited to, the suppression or exclusion of eviden ce, t he dismissa l of some or all counts, advers e jury instructi ons,
contempt proceedings, or other remedies t hat are just under the circumstances .


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.113.0.pdf
Size
424,052 bytes
SHA-256
955e943969e28473e8e59de9f4579a5f572fdf1d99f095d59f63a9429c6b5058
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.113.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top