Case docket
Capitol Hill Baptist Church v. Bowser — U.S. District Court, D.D.C.
Capitol Hill Baptist Church v. Bowser — 10 court filings in the archive from U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, filed between September 22, 2020 and July 8, 2021. Among them: 2 declarations, 1 complaint and 1 motion.
Case facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
|---|---|
| Filings | 10 public filings |
| Filed | 2020-09-22 – 2021-07-08 |
| Document types | declarations (2), complaint (1), motion (1), memorandum or brief (1), opinion (1), notice (1) |
| Original PDFs | 10 of 10 |
Case summary
Capitol Hill Baptist Church v. Bowser, No. 1:20-cv-02710 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, was filed September 22, 2020 by the church against Mayor Muriel Bowser, in her official capacity, and the District of Columbia. The church sought to enjoin enforcement of the District's COVID-19 restrictions insofar as they prevented it from holding socially distanced outdoor worship services with masks, arguing the restrictions violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb, among other laws. On October 9, 2020 the court granted the motion for injunctive relief, finding the church likely to succeed on its RFRA claim. The church voluntarily dismissed the action on July 8, 2021 after the parties reached a full and final settlement.
Case at a glance
| Parties | Plaintiff Capitol Hill Baptist Church; defendants Muriel Bowser, in her official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia, and the District of Columbia. The United States filed a statement of interest and 34 senators filed an amici brief |
|---|---|
| Court and docket | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:20-cv-02710-TNM, before Judge Trevor N. McFadden |
| Program | Not named in the filings on this page. The subject is the District of Columbia's COVID-19 orders limiting gatherings |
| Claims | Violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb et seq., and constitutional claims including under the First Amendment, over the prohibition on religious gatherings of more than 100 people indoors or out |
| Disposition or status | Voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff on July 8, 2021 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) after the parties reached a full and final settlement, following a preliminary injunction in the church's favor on October 9, 2020 |
| Status checked | 2026-09-23 · against DOJ press releases through 2026-09-22; court docket not yet read |
What did the court decide?
That the church is likely to succeed in proving the District's actions violate RFRA: the restrictions substantially burden its exercise of religion, and the District had not offered evidence at that stage of a compelling interest in preventing outdoor meetings with appropriate precautions, or that the prohibition is the least-restrictive means. The court granted the motion for injunctive relief.
What does the complaint say the dispute is about?
That the church's doctrinal requirement of a weekly gathering of its entire congregation conflicts with the Mayor's prohibition on religious gatherings of more than 100 people, indoors or out, and that its members voted to sue after a six-month ban on its religious gatherings.
How did the case end?
With a notice of voluntary dismissal filed July 8, 2021 stating that the parties had reached a full and final settlement of the matter.
Summary written from the documents on this page; every sentence is sourced.
Filings
10 public filings from this case, in filing-date order.
- Complaint — CHBC v. BowserComplaint · PDF
- Declaration of Matthew T. Martens — CHBC v. Bowser (D.D.C.)Declaration · PDF
- Motion for Temporary Restraining Order — CHBC v. BowserMotion · PDF
- Memorandum in Support of TRO — CHBC v. BowserMemorandum or brief · PDF
- U.S. Statement of Interest — CHBC v. BowserPDF
- Amicus Brief of 34 U.S. Senators — CHBC v. Bowser (D.D.C.)PDF
- Amicus Brief of 34 U.S. Senators (ECF 39) — CHBC v. BowserPDF
- Declaration of Dr. LaQuandra Nesbitt — CHBC v. BowserDeclaration · PDF
- Memorandum Opinion (Preliminary Injunction) — CHBC v. BowserOpinion · PDF
- Notice of Voluntary Dismissal — CHBC v. Bowser (D.D.C.)Notice · PDF
Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.