Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings No. 2:25-cr-00462 (United States District Court for the Central District of California) Order of Detention — No. 2:25-cr-00462 (Dkt. 46, C.D. Cal.)

Court filing

Order of Detention — No. 2:25-cr-00462 (Dkt. 46, C.D. Cal.)

Summary

An order of detention in United States v. Kenya Jones, Case No. CR-25-00462-CV-3, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, filed July 29, 2025 as Document 46 and signed by United States Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On a motion of the government, the form order addresses whether conditions of release could reasonably assure the defendant's appearance and the safety of the community. It orders that the defendant be detained prior to trial and committed to the custody of the Attorney General.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed July 29, 2025 in No. 2:25-cr-00462; one of 1 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2025-07-29

Cite this document

“Order of Detention — No. 2:25-cr-00462 (Dkt. 46, C.D. Cal.).” U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 2:25-cr-00462, Doc. 46, filed 2025-07-29. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/cacd-2-25-cr-00462/2025-07-29-order-of-detention-dkt-46/, SHA-256 247408427a088d7b8e5bb0a4b475de89d7eca34fdc0e3dc257665692cc778b09.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case P:25-cr-00462-CV Document 46- Filed 07/29/25 Pagelof4 Page ID #:180

                                             +
                                                         LED
                                                CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

                                                   JUL 2 9 2025

 Dn an FP WY WN oN

                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                      CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
 \o

10                          Plaintiff,    CASE NO. CR-25-00462-CV-3

1]

2   KENYA JONES,
                                          ORDER OF DETENTION
13

14                          Defendant.

15

16                                         ie

17     A. oe On motion of the Government in a case allegedly involving:

18         last yr a crime of violence.

19        2. ()    anoffense with maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death.

20        3. (.)   anarcotics or controlled substance offense with maximum sentence

21                 of ten or more years .

22        4.()     any felony - where the defendant has been convicted of two or more

23                 prior offenses described above.

24        5. ()    any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence that involves a

25                 minor victim, or possession or use of a firearm or destructive device

26                 or any other dangerous weapon, or a failure to register under 18

oe,                U.S.C § 2250.

28     B. (~ On motion by the Government /(_ ) on Court’s own motion, in a case

Case

NY DH A Ff W WN

oo

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

P:25-cr-00462-CV Document46- Filed 07/29/25 Page2of4 Page ID#:181

allegedly involving:
we On the further allegation by the Government of:
1, (~~ a serious risk that the defendant will flee.
2. (.)  aserious risk that the defendant will:
a.( ) obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice.
b.() threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror or
attempt to do so.
C. The Government (is/ ( ) is not entitled to a rebuttable presumption that no
condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant’s

appearance as required and the safety of any person or the community.

Il.
A. il The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will
reasonably assure:
ie er the appearance of the defendant as required.
(y and/or
2. ( _ the safety of any person or the community.
B. (~~ The Court finds that the defendant has not rebutted by sufficient

evidence to the contrary the presumption provided by statute.

Il.
The Court has considered:
A. the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the
offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor
victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device;

B. the weight of evidence against the defendant;

OD

. the history and characteristics of the defendant; and

D. the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or to the community.


Case

Lr WwW WN

oo won Dn MN

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v9)
23
24
25
26
27
28

2:25-cr-00462-CV Document46- Filed 07/29/25 Page3of4 Page ID #:182

IV.
The Court also has considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing and the
arguments and/or statements of counsel, and the Pretrial Services

Report/recommendation.

V.
The Court bases the foregoing finding(s) on the following:

A. (4 As to flight risk: Nature of de offenses’ Velo ah we
our of state after alleged attempted Mugler

B. Oy As to danger: Varwe of offengs \ prior fraud

COnvichen mod forgery, LOonvichon

VI.
A.(.) | The Court finds that a serious risk exists that the defendant will:

1.() obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice.

2.( ) attempt to/( ) threaten, injure or intimidate a witness or juror.


Case

on Nn Dn vn FP WO WN

\oO

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
|
28

P:25-cr-00462-CV Document46- Filed 07/29/25 Page4of4 Page ID #:183

B. The Court bases the foregoing finding(s) on the following:

VIL.

A. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained prior to trial.

B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant be committed to the custody
of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to
the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being
held in custody pending appeal.

C. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant be afforded reasonable
opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on order of a Court of the United States
or on request of any attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the
corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant
to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding.

DATED: July 29, 2025 ‘Cra (CW
HONORABLE ALICIA G. ROSENBERG
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

File and source

File
46.pdf
Size
2,347,631 bytes
SHA-256
247408427a088d7b8e5bb0a4b475de89d7eca34fdc0e3dc257665692cc778b09
Our copy
46.pdf
Back to top