Final judgment — Byrnes v. Fountainhead

Record facts

U.S. District Court, Central District of California · No. 2:20-cv-04149-DDP-RAO · Doc. 51 · 2022-03-25 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
4885-6863-6430.1 
-1-
 FINAL JUDGMENT  
LAW OFFICES 
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble 
Mallory & Natsis LLP 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
ELIZABETH M. BYRNES, INC., a 
corporation, on behalf of itself and all 
other similarly situated, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
FOUNTAINHEAD COMMERCIAL 
CAPITAL, LLC; and DOES 1 through 
10, inclusive, 
Defendant. 
Case No. 2:20-cv-04149-DDP (RAOx) 
Hon. Dean D. Pregerson 
Ctrm: 9C 
FINAL JUDGMENT 
Case 2:20-cv-04149-DDP-RAO   Document 51   Filed 03/25/22   Page 1 of 2   Page ID #:500

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
4885-6863-6430.1 
-2-
       FINAL JUDGMENT  
LAW OFFICES 
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble 
Mallory & Natsis LLP 
            FINAL JUDGMENT 
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Second 
Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Defendants Fountainhead Commercial 
Capital, LLC and Fountainhead SBF LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) [Doc. 40].  
For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motion To 
Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, entered separately on November 24, 2021 
[Doc. 49] (the “Order”), which Order dismissed with prejudice all of the causes of 
action brought against the Defendants on the merits, it is hereby, 
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:  
1.
Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants
Fountainhead Commercial Capital, LLC and Fountainhead SBF LLC and against 
the Plaintiff Elizabeth M. Byrnes, Inc., a corporation, which filed this action on 
behalf of itself and all others similarly situated.  Plaintiff shall recover nothing from 
this action.  
2.
The Court retains and reserves jurisdiction to enter any further orders
that may be just and necessary, including to enforce this Final Judgment and to 
determine entitlement to an award of attorneys’ fees and/or costs.  
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated:   
, 2022 
Hon. Dean D. Pregerson 
Judge, United States District Court 
March 25
Case 2:20-cv-04149-DDP-RAO   Document 51   Filed 03/25/22   Page 2 of 2   Page ID #:501

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cacd.781948.51.0.pdf

Size

188,635 bytes

SHA-256

47435dd8d606575b83ee80990db93ac9057b4b03402b8ebf4e7402528794cecf

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cacd.781948.51.0.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com