Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Blueacorn Beringer Nced 187990 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 2/18/2022. Motions due by 5/31/2022.… — Blueacorn Be…

Court filing

SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 2/18/2022. Motions due by 5/31/2022.… — Blueacorn Beringer (Dkt. 57)

No. 5:21-cv-00251-BO · Doc. 57 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                   FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                                WESTERN DIVISION
                                No. 5:21-CV-00251-BO

Beringer Commerce, Inc., d/b/a Blue
Acorn iCi,

                       Plaintiff,

v.
                                                                 Scheduling Order
Fin Cap Inc., d/b/a “Blueacorn.CO”,
Blue Acorn PPP, LLC, and Blue Oak
Forest, LLC.,

                       Defendants.


       After considering pleadings and the Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties (D.E. 56),
the Court enters the following scheduling order:

       1.      Scope of Discovery

        The scope of discovery in this matter is limited to the issues identified in Paragraph 3(a)
of the Rule 26(f) Report.

       2.      Initial Disclosures

       If the parties have not already done so, they will make the initial disclosures required by
Rule 26(a)(1) by Monday, September 13, 2021.

       3.      Discovery Plan

              a.     All fact discovery shall be initiated in time to be completed by Friday,
       February 18, 2022.

              b.       Each party may serve on any other party up to 30 interrogatories,
       including all discrete subparts.

              c.       Any objection to Interrogatories or Requests for Production shall be stated
       with particularity. Boilerplate objections (e.g. objections without a particularized basis,
       such as “overbroad, irrelevant, burdensome, not reasonably calculated to identify
       admissible evidence”) may be treated as a failure to answer pursuant to Rule 37(a)(4).




        Case 5:21-cv-00251-BO           Document 57        Filed 08/26/21      Page 1 of 3
              d.     Each party may serve on any other party up to 30 Requests for Admission
       pursuant to Rule 36.

               e.      Each party may take up to 25 fact depositions. Depositions may be
       conducted remotely and oaths may be administered remotely. Absent a court order or
       stipulation by the parties, the length of each deposition shall be limited to seven hours on
       one day. Time taken for breaks and recesses shall not count towards the hour limit.

       4.     Expert Reports

              a.     The parties shall make the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(2) on the
       following schedule:

                    i.        Plaintiff’s disclosures shall be made no later than Thursday, March
              10, 2022.

                  ii.      Defendant’s disclosures shall be made no later than Wednesday,
              March 30, 2022.

                   iii.       Depositions of experts shall be occur no later than Friday, April
              29, 2022.

       5.     Amendment of Pleadings and Addition of Parties

             a.      Except as provided by Rule 15(a), the parties must obtain leave of court to
       amend the pleadings or add parties.

               b.      The parties shall file motions to amend the pleadings or join additional
       parties no later than Wednesday, October 13, 2021.

       6.     Protective Orders

       Any proposed protective orders that discuss filing materials under seal must comply with
Local Civil Rule 79.2 and the presiding judge’s practice preferences. Failure to include the
necessary language will result in the court denying the motion without prejudice.

       7.     Dispositive Motion Deadline

       The parties shall file any dispositive motions by Tuesday, May 31, 2022.

       8.     Alternative Dispute Resolution

              a.       The parties shall participate in a mediated settlement conference prior to
       the end of the discovery period. The parties have identified Judge James Gale as their
       agreed-upon mediator.




        Case 5:21-cv-00251-BO          Document 57        Filed 08/26/21      Page 2 of 3
              b.       If a party or parties believe that this case should be exempted from the
       requirement to mediate, they may file a motion requesting an exemption. The motion
       should reflect the position of any party that has not joined in the motion. The court will
       consider the motion and determine, in its discretion, whether to grant the motion.

               c.    If a party or parties believes that a form of alternative dispute resolution
       other than mediation, such as a summary trial or court-hosted settlement conference,
       would be beneficial, they may file a motion requesting to proceed in that manner.

       9.      Trial Date and Related Deadlines

       The trial date and related deadlines will be set by separate order at a later date. However,
the court reserves the right to schedule the case for trial as soon as 30 days after the dispositive
motion deadline.

       10.     Discovery of Electronically Stored Information

       The parties do not anticipate any issues with the preservation or discovery of ESI.

       11.     Extensions of Time to Respond to Discovery Requests

       Under Rule 29(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the parties may stipulate to
extensions of time to respond to discovery and do not need to seek court approval unless the
proposed extension would interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a
motion, or for trial. Motions for extensions of time to respond to discovery that could be
addressed through a stipulation will be viewed with disfavor by the court.

       12.     Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

        A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action
(including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment may
then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any other judgment of this
court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent and
the district judge agrees that referral would be appropriate. The consent form is available on the
court’s website.

      The remaining portions of the Rule 26(f) Report that are not inconsistent with this
Scheduling Order are approved and adopted by the court.



Dated: August
Dated: August 24,
              26, 2021.                              __________________________________
                                                     ROBERT T. NUMBERS, II
                                                     UNITED STATES   MAGISTRATE JUDGE
                                              ______________________________________
                                              Robert T. Numbers, II
                                              United States Magistrate Judge


        Case 5:21-cv-00251-BO          Document 57        Filed 08/26/21      Page 3 of 3


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nced.187990.57.0.pdf
Size
667,846 bytes
SHA-256
3351baba010edfa420037f9d57fc26229c2ecedfc64690817ce52c274306e8fe
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nced.187990.57.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top