Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion — Blueacorn Beringer (Dkt. 47.1)

Summary

A proposed Order, Document 47-1 filed 07/20/21 in Civil Action No. 5:21-CV-251-BO, Beringer Commerce, Inc. d/b/a Blue Acorn iCi v. Fin Cap, Inc. d/b/a Blueacorn.co and other defendants, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The 1-page draft states that defendants James Flores, Stephanie Hockridge Reis and Nathan Reis moved for more time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint under Rule 6 and that the plaintiff consents. It would find good cause and grant the motion, giving those defendants up to and including July 30, 2021 to respond. The date of the order is left blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                   IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
               FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                             WESTERN DIVISION
                       CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-251-BO

BERINGER COMMERCE, INC. d/b/a BLUE                 )
ACORN iCi,                                         )
                                                   )
                         Plaintiff,                )
                                                   )
                       vs.                         )
                                                   )               ORDER
FIN CAP, INC. d/b/a “BLUEACORN.CO,”                )
BLUE ACORN PPP, LLC, BLUE OAK                      )
FOREST, LLC, MICHAEL S. COTA, JAMES                )
FLORES, STEPHANIE HOCKRIDGE REIS,                  )
and NATHAN REIS,                                   )
                                                   )
                         Defendants.               )

      Defendants James Flores, Stephanie Hockridge Reis, and Nathan Reis

(“Defendants”) moved this Court for an extension of time within which they may answer

or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. The Court finds that there is good cause for Defendants’ Motion and

that Plaintiff consents to the extension, and therefore the Motion should be granted.

      IT IS NOW ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is GRANTED, and Defendants James

Flores, Stephanie Hockridge Reis, and Nathan Reis have up to and including July 30,

2021 within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

      This the _____ day of ___________, 2021.




      Case 5:21-cv-00251-BO      Document 47-1    Filed 07/20/21   Page 1 of 1


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.nced.187990.47.1.pdf

Size

63,229 bytes

SHA-256

0411f4632a2f38c028249b4c47f8f586502b7b23846a382b56ef2248a45566eb

Our copy

gov.uscourts.nced.187990.47.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)