Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bank Insider PPP ORDER advising of the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory……

Court filing

ORDER advising of the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory… — Bank Insider PPP (Dkt. 7)

Summary

An order under Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in United States of America v. Eric Rivera, No. 1:24-cr-00267-KMW, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed July 26, 2023 as Document 7. The order states that, as set forth on the record during the defendant's initial appearance that day in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel, the Court confirms the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. It warns that failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences including an order to produce information, a continuance, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges or sanctions. The one-page order carries the signature line of a United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

No. 1:24-cr-00267-KMW · Doc. 7 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW Document7 Filed 07/26/23 Page 1of1PagelD: 172

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Mag No, 7322051(AMD)

y. ORDER

Eric Rivera

Defendant.

Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on

26

July

the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this day of ,

2023, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court
confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the
defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to
do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited
to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of
evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by

the Court.

Hon. Sharon A. King
United States Magistrate Judge

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.njd.546706.7.0.pdf
Size
34,300 bytes
SHA-256
a111a11f85baf87c60ef5575606d8dab53c8ac8e382734e483150cefd195084a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.njd.546706.7.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top