Court filing
ORDER advising of the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory… — Bank Insider PPP (Dkt. 7)
Summary
An order under Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in United States of America v. Eric Rivera, No. 1:24-cr-00267-KMW, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed July 26, 2023 as Document 7. The order states that, as set forth on the record during the defendant's initial appearance that day in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel, the Court confirms the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. It warns that failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences including an order to produce information, a continuance, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges or sanctions. The one-page order carries the signature line of a United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
No. 1:24-cr-00267-KMW · Doc. 7 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW Document7 Filed 07/26/23 Page 1of1PagelD: 172 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Mag No, 7322051(AMD) y. ORDER Eric Rivera Defendant. Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on 26 July the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this day of , 2023, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by the Court. Hon. Sharon A. King United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.546706.7.0.pdf
- Size
- 34,300 bytes
- SHA-256
- a111a11f85baf87c60ef5575606d8dab53c8ac8e382734e483150cefd195084a
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.546706.7.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)