Notice of Appeal — Alvarado v. CUIAB

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California · No. 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK · Doc. 8 · 2024-03-25 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
2 
3 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO 
IN PROPER PERSON 
SPECIAL APPEARANCE 
803 EVERGREEN #A 
9CITY OF WHEATLAND 
4 
COUNTY OF YUBA 
CALIFORNIA 95692 
5 
(775) 899-2632 
J 
ck/ 0-7 /q I dtt -eJ o iJ.JA4cf,; .. ~ 
~ 
6 
7 
8 
9 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
INTRA STATE COMMERCE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
AND 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS BOARD 
16 
AND 
17 
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 
DECISION 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
AND 
ALL UNKNOWN INTRA STATE PARTIES 
Defendant 
Case No.: 2:23-CV-3041 TLN KJN (PS) 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL 
QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC 
UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR 
(PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARD! G T HE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 1 
J
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 1 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
COMES NOW LANCE DELON ALVARADO IN PROPER PERSON A CO PLAINTIFF WITH THE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHO HEREBY GIVES NOTICE OF AN APPEAL GRANTED UNDER FRCP 5.1 
AND 3803(b)( 1) of title 31 of the United States Code w1TH A 
RESTATEMENT REGARDING ARTIII SEC 2 AND THE co PLAINTIFF LANCE 
7 
DELON ALVARADO'S CASE IN CONTROVERSY AND IS A 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
CASE THAT IS A JUSTICIABLE COMPLAINT AND AN ORDER DISMISSING THE co-
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE FILED BY A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ON THE 11 TH DAY OF 
MARCH 2024 
THE CO PLAINTIFF CHALLENGES THE ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE ON A FOUNDATION OF THE 
APPELLANT LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND GRANTED BY THE FIRST 
AMMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. 
WITH THE QUESTION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WISHES TO RECOUP 
ANY OF THE LOSSES OF THE ALLOTTED PANDEMIC RELIEF FOR BREECH OF CONTRACT THRU THE 
PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO BY WAY OF THE UNKNOWN DEFENDANT'S WHOM THE CO 
PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO BELIEVES UNDER AUTHORITY FCR 
title-5/chapter-l/subchapter-8/part-185 FOR EVERY SINGLE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPLAINT AND CLAIM 
FOR THE DAMAGES SOUGHT BY UNITED STATE TAXPAYERS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES OF 
AMERICA WHILE STILL HOLDING HARMLESS STATE GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVANTS AND THEIR STAFFS 
INCLUDING STATE EMPLOYEES THAT HAVE IMMUNITY. 
THAT THE DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE PANDEMIC AND MIGHT JUST HINDER ANY FUTURE 
PLOTS OF MASS FINANCIAL TERROR BESTOWED ONTO THE AMERICAN 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARD ING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 2 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 2 of 33

1 
TAXPAYER BY THE INSURURANCE COROPRATIONS (UNDER"*COVERAGE*"OF 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
LAW) ((PLEASE WISE UP! !)) IN THE FUTURE FOR THE AMERICAN CIVILIAN TAX PAYER'S SAKE!!!!! THE 
POPULATION ALSO KNOWN AS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN TAXPAYERS ARE FINANCIALLY 
DEVISTATED WITHIN THEIR OWN HOME STATES!!!! 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S LEGAL ARGUMENT IS THAT THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS ALREADY HAVE 
HEALTH INSURANCE AND INSURANCE THAT COVERS IMMUNE LEADERS THAT MAKE CRUCIAL DECISIONS 
IN THE TIME OF DISASTERS AND ARE COVERED BY INSURANCE AND THAT GOVERNMENT MANDATED 
INSURANCE AND PRIVATE HEALTH CARE PREMIUMS ALONG WITH UNITED STATES TAXES WOULD BE A 
DOUBLE TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!! (Government taxes) HIGHER "INSURANCE 
PREMIUMS") WITH ONLY ONE ACTING IN TRUE PERFORMANCE THAT BEING THE UNITED STATES AND 
STATE GOVERNNMENTS THAT ARE BEING HELD HOSTAGE BY CORPORATE INSURANCE! The COVID PANDEMIC 
ALLOWED FOR THE Biggest "heist" in American History under color of law QUITE POSSIBLY conducted by insurance corporations PAYED FOR BY 
t he American taxpayers and the in forma paupers LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S continuing expenses' 
IF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS SUFFER THE COSTS CAUSED BY STATE 
AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHO ISSUED MANDATED CLOSURES THAT ENDED UP BEING A MISTSTAKE 
AND CAUSED DAMAGES. WHAT PRAY TELL WOULD STOP ANY TERRORIST VILLIAN 'S FROM SPREADING 
SUCH HEINOUS RUMORS AND STOP THIS TREACHORY FROM EVER HAPPENNING AGAIN ? 
SHOULDN'T CONTRACTED INSURANCE CORPORATIONS COVER THOSE MADE MISTAKES BY WAY OF 
THEIR OWN CONTRACTS WITH THEIR OWN STATE GOVERNMENTS? 
THE TAXPAYERS COMPLAINED IN THE MASSES. 
FILING COMPLAINTS UPON STATE LEADERS BY CLAIMING PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT RELIEF AND 
EVEN SOUGHT HEALTH CARE FACILITIES NATIONWIDE DURING AND FOLLOWING THE COVID PUBLIC 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 3 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 3 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
HEALTH CRISIS WHILE TAXPAYERS ALREADY PAY FOR THEIR OWN MANDATED HEALTH INSURANCE 
COVERAGE. 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO IS PREJUDICED BY A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR UTILIZING LANCE DELON 
ALVARADO'S FREEDOM OF SPEECH WITHOUT A FAIR ARGUMENT BEFORE THE COURT! 
WHY? MERELY FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF HAVING THE CO PLAINTIFF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
ENTER THE DEBATE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS INTERESTED IN 
RECOUPING PUA FUNDING THAT WAS ALLOTTED FOLLOWING THE COVID PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS AND 
THE BREECH OF CONTRACT WITH CALIFORNIA AS REFLECTED WITHIN THE CO PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON 
ALVARADO'S COMPLAINT FOLLOWED BY AN OBJECTION. 
THAT THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MIS INTERPRETED THE OBJECTION LANCE DELON ALVARADO 
FILED 
FINDING THE AMOUNTS STATED AS FRIVILOUS DUE TO THE MIS INTREPRETATION AND THEN DISMISSED 
THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE. 
ARGUMENT: 
BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ARE BURDENED WITH THE TASK OF MAKING KEY DECISIONS DURING 
DISASTERS CRISIS. 
DISASTERS THAT INADVERTANLY CAUSE DAMAGES WHILE IN PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES. 
NOW CALIFORNIA EDD AND THE CUIAB HAS SEIZED THE PLAINTIFF'S PUA ASSISTANCE AND REFUSES TO 
RELEASE THE FEDERAL ALLOTMENT OF PUA FUNDS TO THE PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO! 
A MASTER ONLY STATING AN AMOUNT ABOVE THE MINIMUM $75,000 THAT IS A REQUIRED AMOUNT 
TO FILE A CLAIM IN THE US DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT A HEARING NOR ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE 
COMPLAINT FILED IS REGARDING THE COVID PUA UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE. A FEDERALLY FUNDED 
PROGRAM. 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROG RAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE AB ROGATION PROCLAMATION - 4 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 4 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
THE RECOMMENDATION WAS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WAS OBJECTED DUE TO THE PLAINTIFF'S 
ORIGIONAL COMPLAINT FILED WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CFR STATUTES LISTED BELOW AND AS SUCH 
THE MINIMUM AMOUNT FOR A RECOVERED CLAIM ON AN INSURANCE POLICY OR CLAIM. 
IN ARGUMENT THE CO PLAINTIFF WHO CAN SPEAK AND WRITE FREELY REGARDING HIS OPINIONS 
AND/ OR POSSIBLE PLANS REGARDING SETTLEMENT MONIES MUST HAVE OFFENDED OR 
UNINTENTIONALLY SET BACK A DE NOVO PANEL AND DISTRICT COURT JUDGE WITH THE ENTIRE SCOPE 
OF THE PLAINTIFF'S ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF OF THE MAGNATUDE OF JUST HOW MUCH 
MONEY COULD BE AT STAKE 
THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOLLOWED WITH A DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. 
A PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CULPABLE 
DEFENDANT(S) THAT THE UNITED STATES PROM ICED TO PAY THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF FOR THE 
PANDEMIC. 
THE APPELLANT(S) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CASE ABOVE MENTIONED WAS MERELY DISMISSED 
OUT OF MIS INTERPRETED INTENTION (ELITE AND UPPER CLASS v LOWER CLASS proper person who was just discriminated 
against with dismissal) BETWEEN ALL PARTIES INVOLVED WITHIN THE US DISTRICT COURT COMPLAINT FILED 
DECEMBER 29TH 2023. 
DUE TO LACK OF COMMUNICATION AND MEDIATION ATTEMPTS BEING MADE BY THE CO PLAINTIFF 
WHO ALWAYS WAS AND IS ABROGATED FROM ANY LITIGATION OR MEDIATION DISCUSSIONS OF A DE 
NOVO PANEL THAT INADVERTENTLY AND UNINTENTIONALLY MIS INTERPRETED INTENT AND NOW 
UTILIZING A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE IN PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTY HAS DISMISSED THE 
APPELLANT'S valid with merit and strong foundation DISTRICT COURT COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 
DATED 11 TH DAY OF MARCH 2024. 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING T HE PANDEM IC UNEM PLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 5 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 5 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
THE PLAINTIFF'S PUA UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIM CAME CRASHING INTO NUMEROUS CULPABLE 
DEFENDANT(S) ONE NAMED CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD AND WAS THE 
ONLY NAMED DEFENDANT WITHIN THE ORDER DISMISSING THE ABOVE MENTIONED COMPLAINT AND 
IS NOW BEING PREJUDICE DUE TO A MIS INTERPRETED OBJECTION. 
MULTIPLE DEFENDANT(S) ARE CULPABLE BUT NOT LIABLE TO THE PROPER PERSON LITIGANT NOW 
7 
APPELLANT NAMED LANCE DELON ALVARAD AND MANY MORE ARE LIABLE TO THE UNITED STATES OF 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
l3 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
AMERICA FOR THE PUA FUNDING AMERICANS ALREADY HAVE INSURANCE FOR! 
NOR SHOULD THE CUIAB BE HELD TO ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THE APPELLANT'S LOSSES. 
NOR DID THE APPELLANT MAKE HIS INTENTIONS CLEAR ENOUGH FOR THE COURT WITHIN THE 
COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 29TH 2023 INCLUDING THE APPELLANT'S OBJECTION TO THE MASTERS 
RECOMMENDATION WHEREBY A SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION OF THE COST TO SETTLE THE PUA 
APPLICATION FILED WITHIN THE EDD IN CALIFORNIA WHERE THE APPELLANT WAS FOUND ELIGABLE BY 
THE CUIAB FOR PUA BENEFITS PAYABLE IS ONLY ONE OF MANY ISSUES TO SETTLE THIS PUA MA TIER 
IN REM FOR LANCE DELON ALVARADO WHILE THE UNITED STATES CONTINUES ARGUING WHETHER OR 
NOT THE TAX PAYERS OR INSURANCE CORPORATIONS SHOULD PAY FOR FINANCIAL LOSSES TO OUR 
GREAT COUNTRY THE USA. WHILE LANCE DELON ALVARADO CONTINUES TO BE HOMELESS! 
WHEREBY THE APPELLANT PRAYS FOR EXCUSED NEGLECT FOR THE MISCOMUNICATION. 
THE APPELANT LANCE DELON ALVARADO ONLY TRYING TO DO HIS BEST IN AN UNKNOWN FORUM 
DID NOT INTEND TO OFFEND OR MIS LEAD ANY OF THE PARTIES INVOLVED AND HAS NEVER TAKEN 
LEGAL ACTION AGAINST ANY ENTITY IN THE PAST. THE CO PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S PUA 
COMPLAINT FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGA RDING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROG RAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 6 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 6 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
INCLUDING THE OBJECTION TO THE MASTERS RECOMENDATION THAT LED TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED 
ORDER TO DISMISS. FOR THAT I AM SORRY. PLEASE FORGIVE ME 
CULPABLE DEFENDANT(S) ARE MENTIONED AND ARE FOR THE MOST PART "FOR PROFIT INSURANCE 
CORPORATIONS AND PRIVATE ENTITIES" THAT ARE CONTRACTED TO COVER STATEWIDE LOSSES 
HAVING JOINT CONTRACTS SIGNED BY INSURANCE CORPORATIONS AND STATE GOVERNMENT 
OFFICIALS. 
WITH THAT SAID STATE GOVENORS INADVERTANTLY CAUSED DAMAGES TO THE PUBLIC WHILE IN 
PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES. 
THE PANDEMIC KNOWN AS COVID. 
A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS WHERE STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WORKING WITHIN THE EXECUTIVE, 
LEGISLATURE AND JUDICIAL BRANCHES OF THEIR OWN STATE GOVERNMENTS ENFORCED MANDATES 
THESE DECISIONS LED TO MAJOR SHUT DOWNS TO ALL INDUSTRIES NATIONWIDE EXCEPT THE 
INSURANCE INDUSTRY WHO MADE OBSENE PROFITS BY NOT HAVING TO PAY FOR ANY HEAL TH CARE 
COVERAGES NOR WERE THEY HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE INDIVIDUAL STATE COMPLAINTS OR 
UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS AS A RESULT OF THE DAMAGES CAUSED BY THEIR OWN STATE 
GOVERNMENTS ACTING IN PERFORMANCE ACCORDINGLY YET OBVIOUSLY CAUSED DAMAGES. 
DAMAGES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO CORPORATE INDUSTRY LOSSES DUE TO SHUTDOWNS, 
EMPLOYEES WAGES, LAVED OFF WORKERS WHO, FOLLOWING COVID WERE UNABLE TO AFFORD TO PAY 
RENT OR FIND SUITABLE WORK TO PUT FOOD ON THEIR TABLES FOR THEIR FAMILIES, OR PAY 
MORTGAGES INCLUDING THEIR HOME OWNERS INSURANCE POLICIES, RENT, HEALTH CARE COSTS, 
SMALL BUISNESS CLOSURES LIFE INSURANCE POLICY PREMIUMS TGAT WERE VOIDED DUE TO 
PREMIUMS NOT PAID! THE DAMAGES ARE EXTENSIVE! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 7 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 7 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
INDUSTRY SMALL BUISNESSES AND LARGE CORPORATIONS IS WHAT RUNS AMERICA! THE UNITED 
STATES GIVERNMENT IS SWORN TO PROTECT AGAINST FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ENEMIES OF AMERICA! 
NOT TO PROTECT ONLY FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS PROFITS OR HAVE ONLY ATTORNIES 
FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPIRATIONS ARGUE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! 
STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INADVERTANLY FORGOT ALL AMERICANS ARE MANDATED TO HAVE 
HEALTH INSURANCE. WHY DOES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TAXPAYERS HAVE TO EAT THE COSTS 
TWICE TO PAY FOR EACH STATE CITIZENS HOSPITALIZATIONS AND EMERGENCY ROOM VISITS WHEN 
AMERICANS HAVE HEALTH BENEFITS THROUGH THEIR EMPLOYERS BENEFIT PACKAGES EMPLOYERS 
WHO PAY FOR UNEMPLOYMENT ACCOUNTS INTO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
SYSTEM FOR PROTECTION! BY WAY OF INSURANCE! 
THAT ALL CITIZENS WERE NOTIFIED BY THEIR STATE GOVERNMENTS TO STAY AT HOME AND NOT TO GO 
TO WORK DUE TO PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS. STATE GOVERNMENTS INADVERTANLY CAUSE 
ACCIDENTS AND INJURIES HAPPEN. 
MOST OF WHICH ARE CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE ON THE JOB. 
DAMAGES CAN OCCUR DUE TO NEGLIGENCE ESPECIALLY DURING TIMES OF EMERGENCY. 
NEVADA HAS A CORPORATE FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATION NAMED LIBERTY MUTUAL TO 
COVER SUCH STATEWIDE LOSSES. WHAT FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATION COVERS CALIFORNIA 
UNDER CONTRACT? 
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS HAVE IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL LIABI LITY FOR SUCH LOSSES AS WELL! THROUGH 
THEIR OWN CONTRACTED INSURANCE! 
CONTRACTED INSURANCE CORORATIONS WHOM SHOULD PAY THE MINIMUM AMOUNT FOR EACH 
AND EVERY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPLAINT OR CLAIM AS WELL AS THE MANY SMALL BUISNESS LOSSES 
INCLUDING SMALL BUISNESS'S THAT WENT UNDER! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING T HE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 8 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 8 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
ISNT THAT WHAT INSURANCE IS FOR? 
ARE THE TAX PAYING CITIZENS NOW BEING FORCED DOUBLE TAXATION WITH ONLY ONE PROPER 
PERSON REPRESENTATION NAMED MR LANCE DELON ALVARADO WHO IS MAKING A STAND FOR THE 
UNITED STATES "IN FORMA PAUPER TAXPAYERS OF AMERICA"! 
ARE PREMIUMS FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS DISGUISED AND MEANT TO MISLEAD? ARE 
PREMIUMS ACTUALLY ONLY ANOTHER TAX UPON THE CITIZENS OF EVERY STATE IN THE UNION? OR 
SHOULD THE DEFINITION OF INSURANCE PREMIUMS BE REDEFINED TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE 
TWO? OR SHOULD THE PROPER PERSON APPELLANT GIVE THE DE NOVO PANELS AND DISTRICT COURT 
JUDGE LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S OPINIONATED PROPSED DEFINTION REVISION? Insurance premium 
denned: (a) ONE OF MANY "CLEVER ELITE TACTICT"S USED DURING THE NEVERENDING SOCIAL 
BATTLES IN SOCIAL WARFARE AND DEPLOYED BY THE ELITE CLASS OF SOCIETY.(b) Nothing more but a 
hidden for profit corporate tax on paper and meant to deceive the middle and lower tax paying 
classes signed into law by the upper class tax payers of society who were befriended into thinking 
"what if" and who continue to be defrauded for the sole purpose of protection in any way shape or 
form of any chance of the changing of hands or the redistribution of the elite class of societies and 
corporate shareholder wealth (hint within the proper person complaint tiled the 29th day of December 2023) 
SHOULD NOT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE THEIR MOUTHS ARE AND PAY 
FOR THE DAMAGES UNDER CONTRACTS WITH THEIR OWN STATES! 
SHOULD THE RECOUPMENT OF THE PUA ASSISTANCE THAT THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PAID IN 
RESPONSE TO THE PANDEMIC CONTINUE TO BE SWALLOWED BY THE TAX PAYERS OF AMERICA? 
FOR THE MISTAKES MADE BY OUR FEARLESS LEADERS WHO HAVE THE RELENTLESS TASKS OF 
GOVERNING? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 9 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 9 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
SIMPLE SOLUTIONS AND WAYS TO COMBAT MASSIVE FINANCIAL COSTS AND TO LIMIT THOSE DAMAGES 
FOR THE UNITED STATES TAXPAYING CITIZENS ABROAD AFTER THE REUL TS OF THE PANDEMIC AND 
PUBLIC HEAL TH CONCERNS ARE TO LEVY FINES AGAINST THE DAMAGES CAUSED. 
FINES THAT TRICKLE DOWN TO THE FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS WHO CONTRACTS WITH 
STATES TO PROTECT FROM STATE LOSSES FROM NEGLIGENCE THAT CAUSE DAMAGES! 
THE TRUE MATTER IN RESTATEMENT Ill AS REFLECTED WITHIN THE PROPER PERSON COMPLAINT FILED 
DECEMBER 29TH 2023 NOW COMING BEFORE THE UNITED STATES IS DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS. 
THE APPELLANT WHO IS STILL IN FORMA PAUPEROUS STATUS DUE TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN AS 
WELL AS HAVING FEES WAVED IS CONFUSED AS TO WHAT IS BEING DUSCUSSED DURING THESE 
ALLEDGED DE NOVO HEARING(S) HELD WITHOUT GIVING ANY NOTICE OF ANY SAID HEARING TO BE 
HELD REGARDING THE PROPER PERSON COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 29 2023? 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO ASKS WHY A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 
PREJUDICES AGAINST LANCE DELON ALVARADO FOR PRESENTING FACT BASED EVIDENCE WHILE A US 
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND A DE NOVO PANEL PRESUME ON ASSUMPTION BASED OPINION WITHIN 
THE OBJECTION OF THE MASTERS RECOMMENDATION? 
WHAT DISCUSSION? 
THAT THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF ISNT INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO HAVE AN OPINION THAT SHOULD 
BE HEARD ON THE TRUE SUBJECT MATTER OF THESE DISCUSSIONS WITHIN A LEGAL SYSTEM WHOM IS 
CLEARLY NOT FOCUSED ON THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND THE COSTS 
ASSOCIATED WITH A UNITED STATES CONTRACT THAT WAS BREECHED BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES 
OF AMERICA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 10 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 10 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
A STATE THAT IN FACT CONTRACTED TO DISPURSE PUA FUNDS TO THOSE WHO WERE DIRECTLY 
AFFECTED BY THE PANDEMIC AND WHO LOST THEIR JOBS DUE TO PANDEMIC RELATED EVENTS AND 
WHO DOES OR DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR REGULAR UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE? 
OR IS THE APPELLANT WRONG? 
WRONG FOR BRINGING PART OF HIS ARGUMENT REGARDING COSTS THAT THE APPELLANT BELIEVES 
SHOULD BE BEING DISCUSSRD WITHIN THE COMPLAINT FILED IN A US DISTRICT COURT THEN 
FOLLOWED BY AN OBJECTION ON PAPER AND ON RECORD? 
WHEREBY THE CO PLAINTIFF HAVING NO PRIOR NOTICE OF ANY HEARING(S) THAT WERE HELD, DID OF 
COURSE NOT ATTEND SAID HEARING(S) TO PRESENT EVIDENCE IN FAVOR FOR THE CO PLAINTIFF THE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 
IN ADDITION TO AND INCLUDING EVIDENCE BY WAY OF THE APPELLANT(S) RECORD OF HOW BIG 
CORPORATE INSURANCE CAN CONSPIRE AGAINST JUST ONE CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES WHO 
HAPPENS TO BE LANCE DELON ALVARADO. 
INSURANCE CORPORATIONS CONTINUE HOLDING STATE COURTS IN NEVADA AND IN EACH STATE OF 
THE UNION HOSTAGE SOLELY OUT OF LIABILITY CONCERNS. 
WHERE LANCE DELON ALVARADO IS CONSIDERED THAT LIABILITY! 
WHILE STILL TRYING TO COVER UP THE "INSURANCE FRAUD" THE STATE COURTS OF NEVADA CONTINUE 
TO TRY AND HIDE THEN HUNT THE SOON TO BE APPELLANT WHO IS CURRENTLY FORCED INTO EXILE 
WITHIN CALIFORNIA! 
FRAUD COMMITTED BY AN INSURANCE AGENT WORKING FOR THE PROVIDER LIBERTY MUTUAL 
INSURANCE THE STATE OF NEVADA'S CONTRACTED INSURANCE CARRIER AND THE APPELLANT'S EX 
WIFE'S FORMER EMPLOYER! (please FOR MY FAMILY continue to render JACQUELINE DAWN EVANS financial and legal immunity 
FOR OUR CHILDRENS SAKE thank you) 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 11 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 11 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
]7 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
ALL BECAUSE OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH! 
QUOTED WITHIN EXHIB CON RECORD STATING "NO THREAT OF VIOLENCE" IN AN APPLICATION FOR 
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE! (Victims of domestic violence federal fundi~g Allotments) 
THEN A FICTITIOUS INSURANCE POLICY STARTED W ITHOUT THE PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S 
KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT! 
TPO EXTENDED OVER A YEAR LATER ALL STARTED BECAUSE OF "FREEDOM OF SPEECH !" (INSURANCE FRAUD 
ALONGSIDE EXTENDED TPO OVER A YEAR AFTER THE FIRST TPO WAS FILED AND EXPIRED THEN REOPENED all because FREEDOM OF SPEECH 
ABROGATION BY WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT MASTER'S AND JUDGE 'S OPINIONS BASED ON ASSUMPTION W HERE AS THE COMPLAINT 
FILED DECEMBER 291" 2023 IS FACT BASED W ITH EVIDENCE THAT PROVES BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT THROUGH ALL EXHIBITS TRUTH 
OF THE MATTER IN COMPLAINT REMEDIES ?? PLEASE SEND A LETTER WITH AN OFFER OF A FAIR SETTLEMENT FOR EARLY RESOLUTION 
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE ! ) 
A FREEDOM LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S CONSTITUNIONAL RIGHT CONTINUES TO BE VIOLATED! AND 
INFRINGED UPON THROUGH AN ORDER DISMISSING A US DISTRICT COURT COMPLAINT WITH 
PREJUDICE BECAUSE OF A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE WHO IS TRYING TO SILENCE THE PROPER PERSON 
PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO AND THE US DISTRICT COURT COMPLAINT IN FAVOR FOR 
INSURANCE! AND STILL REFUSES TO PAY THE PUA BARE MINIMUM AMOUNT? 
FORGETTING THE COSTS THAT THE PANDEMIC PUA UNEMPLOYMENT LOST THE UNITED STATES 
TAXPAYING CITIZENS BILLIONS OF UNITED STATES TAXPAYER MONEY WHEN UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS 
ALREADY HAVE INSURANCE AND IMMUNITY COVERED BY INSURANCE! 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO IS FOCUSED ON RECOUPING TAXPAYER MONEY AND TRYING TO BECOME 
FINANCIALLY SECURE FOR LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S SAKE! 
THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE IS FOCUSED ON SAVING INSURANCE CORPORATION PROFITS! 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO WHO IS FOCUSED ON ISSUES LIKE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, TAXPAYERS, 
PANDEMIC RELIEF AND RECOUPMENT, OUR GREAT COUNTRY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OUR 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 12 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 12 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
BRAVE MILITARY IN THIS DANGEROUS WORLD FOLLOWING 9/1 1, VETERANS OF FOREIGN AND 
DOMESTIC SOCIAL WAR, STATE GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, NEIGHBORS, FRIENDS AND MOST 
IMPORTANYLY FAMILY! ALL WHILE CONTINUING HIS LEGAL EDUCATION ON A SAMSUNG CELL PHONE 
AND RENDERING CONSTANT CARE FOR LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S DISABLED MOTHER WHO NEEDS 
CONSTANT CARE! 
DOES THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ONLY GRANT US DISTRICT COURT JUDGES AND DE NOVO 
PANELS FREEDOM OF SPEECH? 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO SERIOUSLY DOUBTS FREEDOM OF SPEECH ACTUALLY EVEN EXISTS 
FOLLOWING A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE WHO DISSMISSES WITH PREJUDICE OVER A COMPLAINT 
REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMEMT ASSISTANCE DUE TO SPEECH WRITTEN EVEN WITHIN 
THE PROPER PERSONS CCOMPLAINT HAVING THE STRONGEST FOUNDATION AND HOLDS MERIT ON 
THE TRUE SUBJECT MATTER IN DEBATE ! THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE INCLUDING THE 
REASONS SET FORTH WHY THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO IS UNABLE TO 
FIND SUITABLE WORK! FOLLOWED BY AN OBJECTION TO A MASTERS RECOMMENDATION ALL BECAUSE 
THE PLAINTIFF STATED THE MINIMUM AM MOUNT OF PUA THE PLAINTIFF WAS ALLOTTED WHICH 
AMMOUNTRD TO LESS THAN THE MINIMUM AMOUNT FOR A US DISTRICT COURT CASE TO BE FILED. 
NEGLECTING THE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS ON THE COMPLAINT ITSELF! OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 
BEING THE BILLIONS OF US TAXPAYER MONIES ALLOTTED FOR PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANC 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S IN ABILITY TO FIND SUITABLE WORK IS BECAUSE BACKGROUND CHECKS ARE 
PERFORMED REFLECTING A RECORD THAT HISTORY PROVES FEDERAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FUNDING 
AND INSURANCE FRAUD WAS IN FACT COMMITTED AGAINST LANCE DELON ALVARADO AND DONE 
WITH WILLFUL DISREGARD TO THE SAFETY AND WELL BEING OF LANCE DELON ALVARADO 
DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER MALUM UN SE AND CONTINUES TO BE DISREGARDED! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDI NG THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PU A) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 13 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 13 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
AN INSURANCE CORPORATION THAT NOT ONLY COMMITTED FRAUD NOW CONTINUES TO BE STALKING 
THE APPELLANT'S ABILITY TO VOICE ANY ARGUMENT IN ANY DISCUSSION ON ANY SUBJECT ENTIRELY! 
INCLUDING A COMPLAINT FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WHEN THE SUBJECT MATTER 
IS PUA UNEMOYMENT ASSISTANCE! 
EVEN NOW IN THE PLAINTIFF'S OWN COMPLAINT EVEN WITH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS A CO 
PLAINTIFF! 
THE SUBJECT IN THIS MATTER IS PUA UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE. IS IT NOT? 
THE UNEMPLOYMENT CAUSED BY THE PANDEMIC PUBLIC HEAL TH CONCERN DISCUSSING KEY POINTS 
AND AUTHORITIES WITH LIKE MINDED LEGAL PEERS WITH AN INCOME THAT IS FAIRLY BASED ON 
TODAYS ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT IN ADDITION TO THE RISE OF THE COSTS OF LIVING AND 
INFLATION! 
THAT THE APPELLANT LANCE DELON ALVARADO IS ASKING IN ADDITION TO THE PUA FUNDING 
PROM ICED AND AS SUCH ASKS FOR AN AWARD OF PUNATIVE DAMAGES AS WELL AS THE MINIMUM 
PUA RELIEF PROM ICED TO HIS PERSON AND FOR THAT FAIR OFFER TO BE SENT FOR HIS APPROVAL 
BEFORE ACCEPTANCE! 
ASKING THE QUESTION WHO SHOULD BE CULPABLE FOR NOT ONLY LANCE DELON ALVARADO BUT TO 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND WHERE THESE COSTS CAN BE RECOUPED? 
WHERE ARE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S ATTORNEY GENERALS? TO TAKE THE LEAD IN A LEGAL 
STANCE FOR EACH OF THEIR OWN STATE'S CIVILIAN POPULATIONS IN THIS ARGUMENT? 
CIVILIANS WHO WERE FORCED TO STAY AT HOME AND THEN PROCEEDED TO SUBMIT UNEMPLOUMENT 
COMPLAINTS ACCORDINGLY 
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFERRED UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE COMPENSATION AFTER 
GOVENORS DECLARED A STATE OF EMERGENCY. AN EMERGENCY THAT TURNED OUT TO BE A FALSE 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 14 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 14 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
CLAIM WHILE IN PERFORMANCE OF STATE GOVERNMENT DUTY! IN PERFORMANCE ACCIDENT THAT 
CAUSED DAMAGES! IMUNITY FOR IN PERFORMANCE CRITICAL THINKING NEGLIGENCE BY TAKING MORE 
TAX PAYER DOLLARS INSTEAD OF THE MINIMUM AMOUNTS PER COMPLAINT FILED IN UNEMPLOYMENT 
CLAIMS LEVIED AGAINST FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS UNDER CONTRACT! 
CIVILIANS NEED TO BE ABLE TO WORK AND FEED THEIR FAMILIES? 
MUST A COURT MARSHAL ENSUE OR SHOULD All ATTORNEY GENERALS OF EACH STATE OF THE UNITED 
STATES OF AMERICA SUBMIT RESIGNATIONS FOR MISTAKES MADE WHILE IN PERFORMANCE OF THEIR 
DUTIES BY NOT SUING THE STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONS FOR All THE UNEMPLOYMENT 
COMPLAINTS AND/ OR CLAIMS AFTER THE FACT! 
ARE STATES NOT COVERED BY INSURANCE FOR ACTS THAT STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS DO IN 
PERFORMANCE THAT CAUSE DAMAGES TO INNOCENT CITIZENS OR PERSONS ON ACCIDENT? OR ON 
THE PANDEMIC CRISIS CAUSED DAMAGES BY AFFECTING THIS COUNTRIES ENTIRE POPULATION AND 
THEIR ABILITIES TO FEED FAMILIES OR PAY FOR MANDATED HEALTH COVERAGE? A DEAL IS A DEAL ISNT 
IT? CONTRACTS SEAL THE DEAL DONT THEY? 
IS IT ONLY OBVIOUS TO ONLY LANCE DELON ALVARADO THAT AMERICANS ARE COVERED BY HEALTH 
PLANS FOR HEAL TH CONCERNS? AND OUR LEADERS ARE COVERED BY WAY OF IMUNITY FROM CIVIL 
LIABILITY THROUGH INSURANCE WHEN DAMAGES ARE ASSESSED 
IS OR IS NOT LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S FULL ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION IN ARGUMENT 
PLAUSABLE? 
STATE INSURANCE COVERS DAMAGES MADE BY THOSE STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHO CAUSED 
DAMAGES IN PERFORMANCE OF THEIR POSITIONS! 
IS THE DE NOVO PANEL SET BACK THAT THEY MAY HAVE M IS INTERPRETED THE PROPER PERSON 
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ENTIRELY? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 15 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 15 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
ISNT THE COMPLAINT REGARDING PUA AND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE! 
THAT THE ABOVE MENTIONED COMPLAINT HAS GONE FROM A SIMPLE MEDIATION FOR EARLY 
SETTLEMENT AND NOW IS FOR MISTAKES MADE BY ALL INVOLVED INCLUDING LANCE DELON 
ALVARADO WHO MERELY OFFERS A HAND WITH A VALID LEGAL COMPLAINT AND ARGUMENT STILL 
OVER FREEDOM OF SPEECH! WHERE HISTORY RECORDED THE INFRINGMENT YEARS AGO AND IS STILL 
BEING USED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF EVEN REGARDING THE SUBJECT MATTER! WOW THE PROPER 
PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO US APPAULED AND QUESTIONS IF LANCE DELON 
ALVARADO RESIDES IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AT ALL? 
DOES THE COURT WISH LANCE DELON ALVARADO TO PRESENT AN ENTIRE LECTURE REGARDING THE 
SCOPE OF ECONOMICS WITHIN THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE WITHIN THE SUBJECT 
MATTER BEING ARGUED? OR THE HISTORY OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
AND THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF OUR GREAT NATION? OR CUN DUCT AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE 
SADITIOUS CRIMINAL ACTS OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND OR JUST 
BACKGROUND CHECKS AND RECON? 
OR IS LANCE DELON ALVARADO TO BE SILENCED FOR SIMPLY LOVING HIS COUNTRY IN A TIME OF 
SOCIAL WARFARE THAT DEALS IN THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY ESPECIALLY REGARDING THE PUA 
FEDERAL ALLOTMENTS PAYED BY TAXPAYERS? 
BECAUSE OF PREJUDICE REGARDING LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S INTELLIGENCE IN FINANCIAL AFFAIRS 
DOES THE DE NIVO PANEL SENTENCE LANCE DELON ALVARADO TO BE HANGED BY THE NECK UNTIL HE 
IS DEAD? IN RESPONSE LANCE DELON ALVARADO WOULD MY REPLY FOR MY COUNTRY I WILL DO AS MY 
COUNTRY WISHES ME TO DO! FOLLOWED BY I AM GLAD IM IN CALUFORNIA WHERE CAPITOL 
PUNISHMENT IS BANNED!!! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL W ITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STAT EMENT REGARDING THE PANDEM IC UNEM PLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 16 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 16 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
l3 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
THAT THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND DE NOVO PANELS ARE DISCRIMINATING HIS PERSON AS 
WELL AS DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE BECAUSE OF THE PLAINTIFF'S VALID LEGAL COMPLAINT WITH 
MERIT AND BEYOND CONTESTATION ON MONIES PROMICED AND SEIZED THEN BECAUSE OF AN 
OPINION ON THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF ECONOMICS INVOLVED IN THE DEBATE WHERE GOVERNMENT AND 
US DISTRICT COURT OFFICIAL JUDGES AND DE NOVO PANELS WHO DILIGENTLY PERFORM THEIR DUTIES 
DURING TIMES OF CRISIS TO THE BEST OF THEIR ABILITIES AND HAVE IMMUNITY FOR MISTAKES MADE 
WHILE IN PERFORMANCE. 
WHILE LANCE DELON ALVARADO CLAIMED THE MINIMUM COMPENSATION AT THE START OF THE 
COMPLAINT NOW BEING APPEALED. BECAUSE TOO MUCH MONEY IS BROUGHT TO THE PUA COVID 
PUBLIC HEALTH INSURANCE ARGUMENT? THAT LANCE DELON ALVARADO IS TRYING HIS BEST TO HELP 
THE UNITED STATES RECOUPE STOLEN TAXPAYER FUNDING! STOLEN BY INSURANCE CORPORATE 
PRIVATEERS! NOW SENTANCED YO BE HANGED BY THE NECK UNTIL PROVEN DEAD! 
YEAH MAKES NO SENCE TO LANCE DELON ALVARADO EITHER? 
THE MAJOR MISTAKE WAS PUTTING EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN ABOVE THE AGE OF MAJORITY OUT OF 
WORK! MINUS FIRST RESPONDING UNITS. 
M ISTAKES DUE TO THE PANDEMIC CLOSURES AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED THAT THE UNITED STATES 
TAXPAYERS PAID FOR WHEN FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS ALREADY CONTRACTED TO 
COVER THE LOSSES OF EACH STATE! AND PUBLIC HEALTH CARE ! 
INADVERTENT MISTAKES? OR THE ABILITY TO FREELY MAKE ON THE SPOT DECISIONS WITHOUT FEER 
OF BEING SUED W ITH A POWER CALLED IMMUNITY ABSALUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSALUTLY!!! 
COVERED AT THE LOWEST SET RATE LOCATED WITHIN THE FEDERAL CODE OF REGULARIONS. OR DOES 
IT COST TO MUCH TO HANG A MAN THESE DAYS??? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDI NG THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 17 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 17 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
BUT NO MONEY FOR NOT EVEN WHEN PROMICED TO LANCE DELON ALVARADO BECAUSE LANCE 
DELON ALVARADO WAS A "VICTIM OF INSURANCE FRAUD AND TRIED TO TALK ABOUT IT! 
EVEN GOING SO FAR AS TO HELP THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FROM FALLING VICTIM 
5 
TO FUTURE INSURANCE FRAUD AS WELL! 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
THIS MATTER AND ARGUMENT HAPPENS TO BE REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT 
ASSISTANCE AND TO PREVENT POSSIBLE FUTURE STATE OR NATION WIDE FINANCIAL DISASTERS 
DURING THE SOCIAL CLASS WARFARE DEALING IN ECONOMIC CLASHES BETWEEN THE ELITE, UPPER, 
MIDDLE AND LOWER CLASSES OF SOCIETY ITSELF! AND TO PREVENT CIVIL WAR FROM OCCURING IS IT 
NOT? 
THE APPELLANT(S) PRAYING THAT GOD FORBIT IT EVER HAPPENS AGAIN ! 
HAVING IMMUNITY IS NECESSARY AND THE PLAINTIFF(S) DO NOT CONTEST THAT IMMUNITY ONLY 
THAT NEGLIGENCE UNFORTUNATLY OCCURS. STATES HAVE INSURANCE TO COVER LOSSES. THE UNITED 
STATES OF AMERICA HAS TAXPAYERS AND SOLDIERS AROUND THE WORLD TO PROTECT AND INSURE 
THE SAFTY OF MILITARY PERSONEL AND A DUTY TO LOWER THE NATIONAL DEFICIT AND RECOUPE THE 
COSTS ASSOCIATED AND TO PROTECT THE UNITED STATES TAXPAYER! 
PANDEMIC FUNDING PAID BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO EACH AND EVERY STATE. NOT TO 
HAVE A JUDGE NOW PREJUDICE AN APPELLANT DUE TO AN OPINION OF THE PROPER PERSON 
PLAINTIFF'S MIS INTERPRETED INTENT WHILE INFORMING THE COURT OF POSSIBLE WAYS TO PREVENT 
OR TO RECOVER COSTS ASSOCIATED AT THE LOWEST RATE OR COSTS ASSOCIATED FOR THE FUTURE BY 
LEARNI NG FROM MIS MANAGEMENT AND ABSALUTISM ! 
HOW POSSIBLE ACTIONS (legal war) IN LAW SHOULD BE WAGED AND HOW THESE COSTS COULD HAVE 
BEEN LEVIED TO FUND CALIFORNIA'S UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD CORPORATION A 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARD ING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 18 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 18 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
SINGLE KNOWN DEFENDANT WHO WAS THE ONLY BOARD TO RESTATE THE PROPER PERSON 
PLAINTIFF'S UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIM PROPERLY. 
WHO THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO WHO IS SOON TO BE AN APPELLANT 
REALLY DOESN 'T HOLD LIABLE FOR LOSSES EXCEEDING THE PROM ICED RATE THE PUA PROGRAM 
OFFERRED. BUT DOES NOW! 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO WAS MERELY BEING HONEST ABOUT HIS 
LOCATION AT THE TIME THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF BECAME UNEMPLOYED DUE TO THE PANDEMIC 
WHILE APPLYING FOR PUA FUNDING. 
THE APPELLANT CONTINUES TO ASK WHY ARE US TAXPAYING CITIZENS STILL BEING HELD LIABLE FOR 
MISTAKES THAT THEIR CIVIL SERVANT LEADERS MADE AT THE COST OF THE TAXPAYER WHEN FOR 
PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS CONTRACTED WITH STATE HELD CONTRACTS SHOULD HAVE 
COVERED EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN FOR COMPLAINING TO GOVENORS OF EVERY STATE WHO WERE 
ONLY DOING WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS BEST FOR THEIR OWN STATE. 
ARE STATE GOVERNMENTS GOING TO JUST SIT BY AND DO NOTHING UNTIL AMERICANS GO OUT 
RIOTING AND STORMING GOVERNMENT FACILITIES BECAUSE STATE GOVERNMENTS DON 'T TAKE LEGAL 
ACTION FOR CITIZENS OF THEIR OWN STATES ON THE STATES BEHALF OR ARE CIVILIANS ONLY 
LIABILITIES? 
WELL STATE GOVERNMENTS MUST HAVE FORGOTTEN WHO PAYS STATE SALERIES BECAUSE IT IS THE 
TAXPAYERS! 
THE US GOVERNMENT WAS FORCED TO TAKE ACTION 
MAKE ON THE SPOT DECISIONS TO APPEASE THE CROWDS AND AVOID POSSIBLE SADITION BY HAVING 
TO COVER THE COSTS THAT STATE OFFICIALS WERE LIED TO BY CDC OFFICIALS? 
MISTAKES HAVE BEEN MADE. 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING T HE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION -19 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 19 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
WHO MAY HAVE TERRORIZED THE PUBLIC? 
INSURANCE CORPORATIONS??? 
WHY CONTINUE TO HIRE STATE OFFICIALS AND CIVIL SERVANTS WHO DON'T REALLY THINK THINGS 
THROUGH AND ARE BOUGHT BY SPECIAL INTEREST CORPORATIONS NAMED INSURANCE! 
THINK BEFORE SHUTTING DOWN THE COUNTRY IN THE FUTURE! 
BY WAY OF SIMPLE A SOLUTION TO THE TRUE MAJOR DOMESTIC THREATS THE UNITED STATES IS 
SWORN TO PROTECT THE UNITED STATES CITIZENS FROM FORIGN OR DOMESTIC THREATS. 
THOSE THREATS THAT SPREAD FEAR BY STRETEGICALLY PLANNED WIDE SPREAD PANIC AND CARRIED 
OUT THROUGH PROPOGANDA AND FOCUS THEIR ATTACK ON THE AMERICAN TAX PAYER! 
TERRORISTS TARGETING UNITED STATES TREASURY AND FEDERAL RESERVE FIDICUARIES. 
THAT THREAT TRULLY STILL EXISTS THROUGH INSURANCE CORPORATE PROFIT MAKING! 
WHAT BETTER WAY TO DRAIN FEDERAL FUNDING BUT TO SPREAD FEAR BY RUMOR OF A PANDEMIC? 
THEN WALK AWAY WITH ALL THE PROFIT!! 
MISTAKES WERE MADE INDEED! 
BY ALL STATE GOVERNMENTS INVOLVED AND A POSSIBLE SIMPLE SOLUTION TO REPLACE NOT ALL 
PANDEMIC MONIES LOST BUT POTENTIALLY ENORMOUS ENOUGH TO SCARE COROPRATE INSURANCE 
FROM POSSIBLY SPREADING ANOTHER PANDEMIC RUMOR! 
TO SKATE AWAY W ITH UNTHINKABLE PROFITS THE NEXT TIME ! 
WHO SEEM TO BE OVER POWERING THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND COURTS THROUGH OUT 
THE UNITED STATES BY HOLDING STATE GOVERNMENTS HOSTAGE AND DEEMING THE CITIZENS OF THE 
UNTED STATES LIABILITIES.? 
COULD IT BE FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS?? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PAN DEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 20 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 20 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
DOES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S FEDERAL TREASURY NEED A BAIL OUT?? 
IN MY OPINION OUR MILITARY SHOULD NOT BE PAYING FOR THEIR OWN MEALS! 
I MET MANY VVETERANSAT THE VA HOSPITALS THAT NEED GREAT CAREGIVERS BY THEIR SIDES 
IT IS SAD WHEN PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITIES NEED TO GO TO COURT TO GET MONEY FROM INSURANCE 
CORPORATIONS TO GET PAID AFTER PERFORMING EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR A CITIZEN WHO PAYS 
FOR INSURANCE TO COVER THEIR HEALTH CARE COSTS AND STILL GETS BILL FROM THE HOSPITAL 
BECAUSE THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN BY AN AMBULANCE TO THE WRONG HOSPITAL UNCONSCIOUS! 
ESPECIALLY WHEN EVERY STATE IS ALREADY COVERED UNDER STATE INSURANCE FOR JUST IN CASE 
COVERAGES!! 
WHERE THE STATES ARE GUILTY OF IN PERFORMANCE DUTIES THAT DID DAMAGE ON THEIR CITIZENS! 
INSURANCE SHOULD COVER! TIME FOR INSURANCE CORPORATIONS TO PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE 
THEIR MOUTHS HAVE BEEN ALL ALONG AND PAY FOR THE LAW THEY CREATED!! 
ON A DAILY BASIS FOR PROFIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS TAKE FROM THE LOWEST LOWER MIDFLE 
AND UPPER CLASS OF SOCIETY FEDERAL TAX PAYERS! 
INSURANCE CORPORATIONS DON'T SEEM TO HAVE LOST ANYTHING INCLUDING MAJOR PROFITS AFTER 
THE PANDEMIC! 
INSURANCE CORPORATIONS COLLECT PREMIUMS LIKE TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION! 
THE TRUE PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN! FINANCIAL TERRORISM AT ITS BEST! 
THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY HAVING GROSSED BILLIONS OF US DOLLARS IN PROFITS AT THE EXPENSE OF 
THE UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS STILL AND ARE STILL GETTING AWAY BY HIDING UNDER COLOR OF LAW 
AND ARE STILL TO GREEDY TO EVEN PAY THE PLAINTIFF'S PUA BENEFITS PROM ICED TO HIS PERSON 
WITHIN THE US DISTRICT COURT COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 29TH 2023. 
GO FIGURE THAT PRICE OUT!!! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 21 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 21 of 33

1 
SIMPLE SOLUTIONS THAT POINT DIRECTLY TO THE WAY TO FREE THE COURTS FROM THE ELITE CLASS OF 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
SOCIETY AND STATE CONTRACTED CORPORATE INSURANCE SHACKLES BY FEDERAL LAW ALREADY ON 
THE BOOKS! 
BY HOLDING INSURANCE CORPORATIONS ACCOUNTABLE FOR REPLACING PANDEMIC ALLOTTED FUNDS 
WHO CONTRACTED TO EACH OF THE 50 STATES AND TERRITORIES TO COVER THOSE MISTAKES AT THE 
MINIMUM COST PER CLAIM! 
THE APPELLANT(S) ARGUE THAT 
FOLLOWING A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS FALLING UNDER AUTHORITY title-5/chapter-l/subchapter-B/part-
185 SHOULD GIVE THE ATTORNY GENERALS THE AMMUNITION TO SUE CORPORATE STATE 
CONTRACTED INSURANCE CORPORATIONS AND THE ELITE CLASS OF SOCIETY FOR THE RECOUPMENT 
OF LOSSES SUSTAINED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR PANDEMIC RELIEF. ALL 50 STATES 
AND TERRITORIES. STATE GOVERNMENT MISTAKES THAT CAUSED DAMAGES TO MILLIONS OF UNITED 
STATES CITIZENS BY STATE GOVENORS ACTING IN PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTY AND CDC OFFICIALS 
ACTING IN THEIR FULL CAPASITY AND HAVE IMMUNITY FROM BEING HELD LIABLE PERSONALLY AND 
COVERED BY INSURANCE CONTRACTS TO REPAY DAMAGES AT THE LOWEST POSSIBLE FIXED RATE 
UNDER FEDERAL LAW!! 
DAMAGE COMPLAINTS FILED IN THE FORM OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ON RECORD BY 
WAY OF APPLICATIONS FOR PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS ARE FILED WITHIN CALIFORNIA'S 
EDD FACILITIES AND EVERY STATE IN THE UNIONS UNEMPLOYMENT FILES THAT REFLECT THE 
COMPLAINT OF COVID STATE CLOSURES! 
THE FEAR OF THE COVID PANDEMIC SLOWLY ENCROACHES ON THE INSURANCE FOR PROFIT PROFITS!!! 
THE UNITED STATES BAILED OUT EVERY STATE TO AVOID POPULATION CIVIL UNREST UNTIL ALL THE 
PAPERWORK WAS FINALIZED THROUGH THE STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENTS! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGA RDING T HE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 22 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 22 of 33

1 
AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NOW KNOWINLGY WANTS THOSE FUNDS BACK!! 
2 
3 
4 
5 
AFTER ALOTTING OR LOANING PANDEMIC RELIEF THAT TURNED OUT TO BE AN UNKOWINGLY STATE 
GOVERNMENT MISTAKE THAT THE STATES ARE NOW UNDER CONTRACT FOR REINBURSMENT BY THE 
INSURANCE CORPORATIONS THAT COVER STATE EMPLOYEE MISTAKES OR MISTAKEN FRAUD FOR NO 
6 
UNDERSTANDING THE LAWS THAT GOVERN! 
7 
8 
9 
NOT UCC CORPORATE INSURANCE LAW! 
THE TAXPAYERS PAY TO BE COVERED BY INSURANCE CORPORATIONS MANDATED BY GOVERNMENT 
10 
LAW! CORPORATE INSURANCE IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT!!! 
11 
12 
NOR DO THE CULPABLE CORPORATE INSURANCE (DEFENDANT(S) HAVE POWER 
13 
OVER GOVERNMENT OR THE COURTS! 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
WHY SHOULD SOCIETY AND THE MISREPRESENTATION OF A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS THAT TURNED OUT 
TO BE JUST ANOTHER FLU YEAR CONTINUE TO HAUNT THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT FOR FAILURE OF 
THE ATTORNEY GENERALS TO HOLD INSURANCE CORPORATIONS ACCOUNTABLE? 
THEIR OWN WRITTEN POLICIES AND CONTRACTS WITH THE STATES THEY GOVERN!! 
CORPORATE INSURANCE INDUSRIES PERSONAL PROFITS IN THE HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF US DOLLARS 
AT AMERICAN TAX PAYER EXPENSE!!! 
IS ANYBODY GETTING THISBPAINTED PICTURE ON A FOUNDATION THAT THE UNITED STATES 
CONSTIUTION WAS WRITTEN FOR!! WE THE PEOPKE OF THE UNITED STATE IN ORDER TO FORM A MORE 
PERFECT UNION! FREEDOM OF SPEECH! MIGHTEIR THEN THE PEN THAT US MIGHTIER THAN THE 
SWORD! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING T HE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANC E PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 23 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 23 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
AS CLEARLY SHOWN WITHIN THE APPELLANT'S OBJECTION TO A MASTERS RECOMMENDATION OF 
COURSE! 
WHERE NO HEARING WAS SET! 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO SIMPLY 
STATED IN HIS OBJECTION THESE FACTS AND OF COURSE DOES NOT EXPECT BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN 
THE COMPLAINT FILED. THAT WOULD BE INSANE. 
WHAT WOULD EVEN BE MORE INSANE IS IF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOES NOT CARE ABOUT 
THE RECOUPMENT OF FEDERAL FUNDING BACK INTO THE TREASURY?! 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF WOULD CERTAINLY HOPE THAT THAT ISNT THE CASE!! 
THE COSTS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND DE NOVO PANELS INCLUDING US DISTRICT COURT JUDGES AND 
FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLAINTS FILED IN THE US DISTRICT COURT NOW HAVING TO BE 
FILED IN A US DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS DUE TO SPECULATION AND NOT FACT! MUST BE 
ASTOUNDING! 
THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND DE NOVO PANEL MUST SUPPORT THE OBSENE PROFITS OF 
INSURANCE CORPORATIONS WHO CONTINUE TO REEP BILLIONS OF US DOLLARS AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE! 
THE APPELLANT IS STILL UNSURE OF THE US DISTRICT COURTS PEJUDICE REASONS AND LEGAL BASIS 
OTHER THAN AN ASSUMPTION OF LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S TRUE INTENT ON ITS REASONING AS TO 
DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE? 
BY DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE THE CO PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S COMPLAINT CLEARLY 
SHOWS THE US DISTRICT COURTS TRUE COLORS. 
BUT ARE THEY RED WHITE AND BLUE? 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO REMINDING THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND THE DE NOVO PANEL THAT 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO WAS FOUND TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR PUA BENEFITS PAYABLE AFTER LOSING HIS 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PAN DEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM O R (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 24 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 24 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
EMPLOYMENT AS A CAREGIVER FOR A RETIRED UNITED STATES VETERAN WHOM SERVED IN THE 
VIETNAM WAR. 
THAT LANCE DELON ALVARADO WAS EXPELLED FROM A PARALEGAL COURSE OF STUDY DUE TO 
TUITION COSTS AS A RESULT OF THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF NOT BEING ABLE TO PAY THESE COSTS. 
AFTER COVID PANDEMIC! 
YET SEEMS TO BE THE ONLY LITIGANT IN THE PROPER PERSON COMPLAINT LEARNING FROM PAST 
MISTAKES MADE BY HIS PERSON AS WELL AS FROM EVERY BODY AROUND HIM INCLUDING THE 
DEFENDANT(S) AND THE LEGAL PROCESS. 
WHEREBY THE CO PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO DOESN 'T PREJUDICE THE US DISTRICT COURT 
JUDGE FOR MAKING A LEGAL ERROR IN OPINION NOR DOES LANCE DELON ALVARADO HOLD THE DE 
NOVO PANEL LIABLE OR PREJUDICES AGAINST OFFICIALS ACTING WITHIN THEIR PROFFESIONAL FORUM 
OR CAPASITY FOR WHATEVER DISCUSSIONS HELD BEHIND CLOSED DOORS FOR THEY ARE IMMUNE TO 
CIVIL REMEDIES UNDER THE LAW. WHILE BEING COVERED BY INSURANCE! 
THE PROPER PERSON 'S COMPLAINT INCLUDES JUDICIAL ECONOMY IN MIND MISTAKES MADE IN THE 
PAST INCLUDING LITIGATIONS IN THE PRESENT FORM AND HOW FUTURE COSTS SHOULD BE 
CONSIDERED FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE MASS LITIGATIONS. OR HOW TO PREVENT BEING HELD HOSTAGE 
BY BIG INSURSNCE CORPORATION AND DIRTY LAWYER PROFITEERS! 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO DOES IN FACT EXPECT CORPORATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONS TO FOLLOW 
THE LAW BY PAYING FOR THE MISTAKES OF THOSE STATE ENTITIES AND CIVIL SERVANT'S BY WAY OF 
STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONS TO PAY FOR THEIR OWN STATES DAMAGES AND DAMAGES UPON 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF'S PERSON AS CONTRACTED WITHIN THE STATES WHERE THE PROPER 
PERSON PLAINTIFF LIVED AND NOW BEING FORCED INTO EXILE! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEM IC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 25 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 25 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
BUT DOES NOT EXPECT THIS INSURANCE PREJUDICE OPINION TO FOLLOW AND STALK HIM 
EVERYWHERE HE DECIDES TO RESIDE! 
THAT IF THE US DISTRICT COURT FOLLOWED ITS OWN RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND NOT ASSUME 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE ALVARADO'S INTENT, MR LANCE DELON ALVARADO WOULD 
HAVE TESTIFIED AT A HEARING IF NOTICE WAS EVEN PROPERLY GIVEN ! 
7 
YET THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF COMPREHENDS THAT THERE WAS NO NEED FOR SUCH A HEARING 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
WHEN THE COMPLAINT THAT PROVES BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT AS ACCURATE WITH ONLY 
ONE DISCREPENCY? 
HOW MUCH SHOULD THE CULPABLE DEFENDANT(S) PAY OUT OF THE CULPABLE DEFENDANT(S) 
POCKETS? HOW MANY MISTAKES DID CIVIL SERVANTS AND STATE ENTITIES MAKE DURING THE COVID 
PANDEMIC INCLUDING MISMANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL FUNDING AND COSTS ASSOCIATED 
AND BY FEDERAL LAW UPON THE FACTS THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF PRAYS FOR COMPENSATION 
PURPOSES. 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF IS CURIOUS AS TO THE AMOUNT IN QUESTION AS WELL? 
THAT THE EVIDENCE MARKED AS EXHIBIT C IS ONLY A PREVIEW OF THE FULL SCOPE OF ABUSES BY 
WAY OF MISTAKE 
THAT EXHIBIT C ALSO PROVES BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT THAT LANCE DELON ALVARADO 
SHOULD RECEIVE PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT UNDER COLOR OF LAW FOR 
DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER FOR INSURANCE COMMITED FRAUD AGAINST HIS PERSON BY A 
FICTITIOUS POLICY OPENED IN HIS NAME THAT REFLECTS THE TRUE NATURE OF EVENTS THAT 
FOLLOWED IN THE WAKE OF AND LIMITS LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S ABILITY AT FINDING SUITABLE 
EMPLOYMENT WITHIN A PAY RANGE THAT THE WASHOE COUNTY NEVADA DISTRICT COURTS FOUND 
AN AMOUNT YEARS AGO (2011-2014) DURING LANCE ALVARADO'S DIVORCE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
STATEMENT REGARD ING T HE PANDEMIC UNEM PLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 26 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 26 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
TPO AND ENSUEING SUPREME COURT OF NEVADAS OPINION AND MISREPRESENTATION BY REFUSING 
TO FILE AN APPEAL REGARDING THE FEES AND COSTS AND ARE ONLY A FEW EXAMPLES OF THE PROPER 
PERSON PLAINTIFF BEING LEGALLY ABUSED BY THE NEVADA STATE COURTS. 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF WHILE CONTINUING HIS EDUCATION TO COMBAT THOSE 
ACCUSATIONS NOW COM BATTING AN ORDER DISMISSING A PUA COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE? WHAT 
IS ACTUALLY BEING CONSIDERED IN THESE "CLOSED DOOR DE NOVO PANELS ANYWAY"? 
THE PUA FUNDING OR PAST LITIGATION REGARDING PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT? 
OR ONLY AN INVESTIGATION INTO LANCE DELON ALVARADO? 
IS A DE NOVO PANEL NVESTIGATION FOR CORPORATE INSURANCE FRAUD TAKING PLACE ON LANCE 
DELON ALVARADO 'S BEHALF? 
WHERE IS THE CONSIDERATION IN THE FACT THAT THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF HAS NEVER FILED A 
COMPLAINT OR SUED FOR ANY DAMAGES AND THE REASONS THEREOF? LEARNING AS TIME GOES BY 
ON THE APPELLANT'S OWN AND STILL UNABLE TO ESCAPE NEVADA'S TORTUOUS LEGAL MEANS DUE 
TO INSURANCE FRAUD! 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO EVEN SOUGHT LEGAL HELP FROM NUMEROUS ATTORNIES EVEN PRO BONO 
ATTORNIES WHO CLAIM TO HELP THOSE WRONGED BY THE DEFENDANT(S) WHOM STILL TO THIS DAY 
AND IN THIS MATTER REFUSE TO RENDER AID NOR PROVIDE ANY SUCH LEGAL ADVISE. 
THAT THE ATTORNIES NEVADA LENT THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF WERE ACTING FOR THEIR OWN 
JUDICIAL ECONOMY CONCERNS AND NOT PROVIDNG COMPETENT LITIGATION IN THE DEFENCE OF THE 
PLAINTIFF WHOM EVEN PUBLIC DEFENDERS JUST GHOSTED AS RECENT AS JULY 2023! 
THE FILED COMPLAINT, NOW A SOON TO BE US DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS PLEA FOLLOWING THIS 
NOTICE OF APPEAL THAT THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF THOUGHT WAS IN THE PROPER JURISDICTION 
FOR SUCH A COMPLAINT SHOULD BE IN MARITIME JURISDICTION BEING HOW TWO STATES AND CROSS 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 27 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 27 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
BOARDERS IF THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF IS NOT MISTAKEN WHILE WORKING ON THE APPELLANT'S 
OWN CONTINUED EDUCATION. 
HINTS TOWARD BEING HOW CULPIBLE LOSSES NOW ACCUMULATE WITHIN BOTH NEVADA NOW IN 
CALIFORNIA CONTINUE TO INCURR! 
WHERE THE PROPER PERSON LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S LOSSES EXCEED FAR AND WELL BEYOND 
$75000.00 US DOLLARS. 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF AGAIN ASKS WHAT AMOUNT IS A FAIR AMOUNT IN SUCH 
CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE NO COUNTER OFFER WAS EVEN ATTEMPTED OR PRESENTED BY THIS SO 
CALLED DE NOVO PANEL 
NOR HAVE ANY OF THE DEFENDANT(S) MADE AN OFFER NOT EVEN EXCEEDING THE MINIMUM OFFER 
MADE BY AND FOR LANCE DELON ALVARADO! 
ONLY A MAGISTRATED OPINION THAT THE COMPLAINT WAS NOT FOR ENOUGH MONEY? TO EVEN 
CONSIDER? 
WHERE LANCE DELON ALVARADO CLEARLY WITHOUT A DOUBT CONTINUES TO BE LEGALLY BULLIED, 
ABROGATED, WRONGFULLY ACCUSED WITH EXCESSIVE PROSECUTION EVEN PREJUDICED BY NEVADA 
STATE COURTS REGARDING AN INSURANCE POLICY OPENED WITHOUT THE PLAINTIFF'S KNOWLEDGE 0 
CONSENT? AND OBVIOUSLY CONTINUES TO BOIL OVER TO THE DEFENDANT(S) PUA UNEMPLOYMENT 
INSURANCE CLAIM WITH PREJDICE AND DISMISSED BY A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AFTER LANCE 
DELON ALVARADO HAVING BEEN FOUND ELIGIBLE FOR PUA BENEFITS PAYABLE BECAUSE OF TOO MUCH 
INSURANCE MONEY WAS BROUGHT TO THE ARGUMENT?? 
HOW MANY MORE LEGAL LITIGATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS NEED TO TAKE PLACE BEFORE INSURANCE 
STOPS BULLYING THE CO PLAINTIFF LITIGANT SOON TO BE APPELLANT AND LEAVE LANCE DELON 
ALVARADO ALONE? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEM PLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 28 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 28 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
NOT ONLY HAS IT CAUSED LANCE DELON ALVARADO TO LIVE IN DESTITUDE BUT CONSTANTLY LIVING IN 
FEAR OF ANY COURT ROOM OR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ENTIRLY! 
HOW MUCH WILL INSURANCE HAVE TO PAY FOR LANCE DELON ALVARADO TO BE ABLE TO LIVE IN 
PEACE FAR AWAY FROM INSURANCE HARRASSMENT? 
THE PROPER PERSON LITIGANT EVEN FOLLOWING AN OBJECTION AND PRAYING FOR MEDIATION 
NOTIFICATION BY MAIL TO NEGOTIATE A "FAIR SETTLEMENT" FOR LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S IN 
PROPER PERSON COMPLAINT CONTINUES TO BE IGNORED. 
WHAT DOES THE DISTRICT COURT WANT OR NEED A DE NOVO PANEL TO DEFINE FACT BASED PROOF 
OF, AND WHAT AMOUNT DOES THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND THE DE NOVO PANEL PRESUME 
THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF DESERVES OR HAS EARNED FOR THESE CONSTANT LEGAL ATTROCITIES 
COMMITTED UPON HIS PERSON? 
DIRTY AND ROTTEN TACTICS UPON LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S PERSON THAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED 
AS THE TACTICS USED BY THE UNITED STATES CIA MK ULTRA PROGRAM. 
BY STEPPING UP AND FILING A COMPLAINT OF SUCH MAGNATUDE THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND 
THE US DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE THE DE NOVO PANEL, WHO NOW SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF 
THEMSELVES FOR AGAIN PROVING TO THE WORLD THAT ALL THE COURTS AROUND AMERICA SEEM TO 
ONLY CARE ABOUT IS MONEY AND NOT TRUE JUSTICE ONLY PROTECTING CORPORATE INSURANCE AND 
THEIR PROFITS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER RATHER THAN HOLDING THE 
DEFENDANT(S) ACCOUNTABLE UNDER CONTRACT FOR CIVIL SERVANT'S AND MISTAKES CONSTANTLY 
BEING MADE BY THOSE SWORN TO PROTECT AND UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS WITHIN 
THEIR OWN STATES. 
WHEN WILL JUSTICE BE SERVED? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARD ING T HE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 29 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 29 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
BY CONTINUING TO LEGALLY BULLY LANCE DELON ALVARADO OVER PAST INSURANCE FRAUD NOW 
PRESENT IN PUA PANDEMIC AND STILL AT TAX PAYERS EXPENSE AND UPON THE PROPER PERSON 
PLAINTIFF WHO PRESENTED TO THE US DISTRICT COURT THESE FACTS SHOWS NOT THE COLORS OF THE 
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FLAG BUT ONLY SEPERATES THE NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA FLAGS WHEN 
ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISABLE DOESN 'T MEAN LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ONLY INSURANCE 
7 
CORPORATIONS. 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
WHY IS THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF PREJUDICED FOR ASKING THE SAME QUESTION? HOW MUCH 
MONEY IS TO BE ALLOTTED TO LANCE DELON ALVARADO? A PLAIN, SIMPLE AND A FAIR QUESTION TO 
ASK THE US DISTRICT COURT. AND A FAIR DEBATE TO BE ARGUED! 
A FAIR OFFER THAT LANCE DELON ALVARADO SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO MAKE ON A SECOND 
COMPLAINT AFTER PLACING THE MINIMUM AMOUNT ON THE COMPLAINT ITSELF CONSIDERING THE 
FACTS! 
WOULD THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ALONG WITH THE DE NOVO PANEL AGREE TO THAT 
ASSUMPTION? 
YET INSTEAD OF USING REASON A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DI MISSES A COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST 
INSURANCE THAT LITERALLY RECOUPS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR 
BREECH OF A UNITED STATES CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ONE OF 49 OTHER STATES 
AND TERRITORIES. 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ASKS THE US DISTRICT COURT AND THE DE NOVO PANEL THESE 
SIMPLE QUESTIONS: 
1. 
FOR WHAT REASON OTHER THAN LANCE DELON ALVARADO'S FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND 
MONEY DID THE DE NOVO PANEL AND A US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DISMISS LANCE DELON 
ALVARADO'S COMPLAINT? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 30 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 30 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
2. IS THE DE NOVO PANEL DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ITS 
TAXPAYERS OR FOR THE DEFENDANT(S) WHO JUST ASSUME? 
3. DOES THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AS WELL AS THE DE NOVO PANEL BASE THEIR OPINION OF THE 
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE FOR JUST ONE DEFENDANT OR FOR PROFIT MAKING CULPIBLE 
DEFENDANT(S) WHO ARE INSURANCE CORPORATIONS AND THEIR PAID ATTORNIES? 
7 
4(a). WHY DOES LANCE DELON ALVARADO HAVE TO ASSUME TAKING THE ROLL AND SPEAK FOR THE 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON ITS BEHALF? 
(b) ISNT THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERALS JOB? 
5. HOW LONG ARE ALL COURTS ACROSS AMERICA GOING TO CONTINUE BEING HELD HOSTSGE BY 
INSURSNCE CORPORATIONS AND THEIR ATTORNIES? 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REMINDS THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND THE DE NOVO PANEL 
THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CITIZENS INCLUDING LANCE DELON ALVARADO ARE ASSETS TO 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND NOT LIABILITIES! NOR WILL BIG CORPORATE INSURANCE BE 
ALLOWED TO RAPE PILLAGE AND PLUNDER THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY NOR THE UNITED STATES 
GOVERNMENT OR EVEN STATE GOVERNMENTS AND JUDICIARIES UNKNOWINGLY BEING HELD HOSTAGE 
IN THE NAME OF LIABILITY AND THE UNITED STATES TAXPAYERS WITH ANY MORE FEAR TACTICT 
GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWS UTILIZING WIDE SPREAD PANIC TACTICS AND GET AWAY WITH IT WHILE 
PRETENDING TO BE THE "GOOD CORPORATION OF INSURANCE INDUSTRY PROTECTORS WHEN 
INSURANCE ARE ONLY PIRATING THE LEGAL SYSTEM! 
IN CONCLUSION THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF MAKES ANOTHER STATEMENT BASED ON FACT 
"THAT PRIDE AND PREJUDICE MUST GO HAND IN HAND, AND THAT THE US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE IS 
FULL OF PREJUDICE. WHERE IS THE PRIDE OF THE UNITED STATES DE NOVO PANELS? 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDI NG THE PAN DEM IC UNEM PLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 31 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 31 of 33

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS A CONTRACT A CONTRACT THAT CALIFORNIA AND ITS CORPORATE PROFIT 
MAKING ENTITIES HAVE BREECHED! THE CFR IS MEANT TO PROTECT TAX PAYERS AND CIVIL SERVANTS 
NOT FOR THE POCKETS OF COROPRATE INSURANCE PROFITEERS WHO CONTINUE TO WLLFULLY 
MISREPRESENT THE FACTS OF THIS PUA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMPLAINT. 
THAT IF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOT INTERESTED IN RECOUPING PANDEMIC DISASTER 
RELIEF FUNDING THEN THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO WILL SEIZE THE 
OPPORTUNITY ON BEHALF OF THE CO PLAINTIFF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DURING MEDIATION 
FOR SETTLEMENT! THE PROPER PERSON CO PLAINTIFF INFORMS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO 
NEVER FEAR AND THAT LANCE DELON ALVARADO HAS THE UNITED STATES COVERED! 
ANOTHER REASON WHY UTILIZING CASE LAW IS INSIGNIFICANT IS BECAUSE A CASE LIKE THIS HAS 
NEVER BEEN HEARD OF IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! AND 
THE HOMELESS JOBLESS PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO IS THANKFUL FOR SUCH 
COMPETENT LEADERS ASSISTING HIM WITHIN HIS PLIGHT IN THE PROPER PERSON PLAINTIFF'S TRUE 
TIME OF NEED. 
THANK YOU DISTRICT COURT JUDGE I AM TRULLY SORRY AND WITH DEEPEST REGRET I HEREBY INFORM 
THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNA THAT THE US DISTRICT COURT 
JUDGE AND DENOVO PANEL ASSIGNED ALONG WITH THE COURTS OPINIONATED ASSUMPTION 
DIRECTED AT THE CO PLAINTIFF LANCE DELON ALVARADO WAS IN FACT WRONG AND THAT LANCE 
DELON ALVARADO HEREBY GIVES NOTICE OF AN UPCOMING APPEAL REGARDING THE PROPER PERSON 
COMPLAINT FILED ON DECEMBER 29TH 2023 AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE DATED MARCH 11 TH 2024 
WILL BE APPEALED! 
UNLESS A REASONABLE OFFER TO SETTLE THIS MATTER IS SENT TO LANCE DELON ALVRADO DURING 
SUCH PROCESS! 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL Q UESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE PROG RAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 32 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 32 of 33

I 
, • 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
flj 
.. l 
t? q 
771_ 
Dated this: 
/ //J 1 rV( ~ 
/ 
Signed ~·- --------
___.-- ~ 
LANCE DELON ALVARADO 
IN PROPER PERSON 
AND FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
8 
Signed: ;:z:;.,-;.:c:::.==--•oc-------
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
Lance Delon Alvarado 
Special Appearance 
[ATTORNEY N;ts;ME] 
NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF "CASE IN CONTROVERSY" AND 
28 
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PANDEMIC UNEMPLOYMENT ASS ISTANCE PROGRAM OR (PUA) 
TITLED: THE ABROGATION PROCLAMATION - 33 
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK     Document 8     Filed 03/25/24     Page 33 of 33

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.caed.439404.8.0.pdf

Size

485,735 bytes

SHA-256

ba70774ec2ee61ebe728dd51bd694f9c8a2e02aef7dd9fc54ebe70875eee9fcb

Our copy

gov.uscourts.caed.439404.8.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)