Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Lance Delon Alvarado v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board — E.D. Cal., No. 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-CSK Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations — Alvarado v. CUIAB

Court filing

Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations — Alvarado v. CUIAB

Summary

An order in Lance Delon Alvarado v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, et al., Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-KJN in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, filed 03/12/24 as Document 6 and dated March 11, 2024 by Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge. Alvarado proceeded without counsel, and the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations on February 16, 2024, to which he objected on February 29, 2024. After de novo review, the court adopts the findings and recommendations in full, dismisses the action with prejudice, denies his motion for e-filing access as moot and directs the clerk to close the case.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations — Alvarado v. CUIAB.” Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/alvarado-v-cuiab/2024-03-12-order/, SHA-256 ff78fa76b87cfbcb8bd8bf212f63bb7b77a06fe2debab38790776b93a2604d6b.

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LANCE DELON ALVARADO,
Plaintiff,
v.
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT
INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, et al.,
Defendants.
No.  2:23-cv-3041-TLN-KJN

ORDER

Plaintiff proceeds in this matter without counsel.  This matter was referred to a United
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No.
4), which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days.  (ECF No. 4.)  On
February 29, 2024, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations.  (ECF No. 5.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case.  Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
analysis.
///
///
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-KJN   Document 6   Filed 03/12/24   Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on February 16, 2024 (ECF No. 4) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice;
3. Plaintiff’s Motion for E-Filling Access (ECF No. 3) is DENIED as moot; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Date: March 11, 2024
 Troy L. Nunley
 United States District Judge
Case 2:23-cv-03041-TLN-KJN   Document 6   Filed 03/12/24   Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.caed.439404.6.0.pdf
Size
167,503 bytes
SHA-256
ff78fa76b87cfbcb8bd8bf212f63bb7b77a06fe2debab38790776b93a2604d6b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.caed.439404.6.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top