Court filing

Plaintiffs' letter submitting proposed preliminary injunction order (Feb. 5, 2021) — Agudath Israel v. Cuomo (2d Cir.)

Summary

A one-page letter, Document 39, filed 02/05/21 in Agudath Israel of America, et al. v. Andrew M. Cuomo, No. 1:20-cv-04834-KAM-RML, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, from plaintiffs' counsel Avi Schick to The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto. As directed at that day's status conference, it encloses a proposed preliminary injunction order and states that Defendant consents to its language except for one sentence. It reports that Defendant also requests language ending the injunction by its own terms if a revised executive order issues. Plaintiffs state that neither feature was in the Court's January 19, 2021 Order granting a preliminary injunction against the 10 and 25-person limits on houses of worship in Executive Order 202.68, and that neither is necessary.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed February 5, 2021 in Agudath Israel of America v. Cuomo; one of 38 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Filed	2021-02-05

Cite this document

“Plaintiffs' letter submitting proposed preliminary injunction order (Feb. 5, 2021) — Agudath Israel v. Cuomo (2d Cir.).” U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, No. 1:20-cv-04834-KAM-RML, Doc. 39, filed 2021-02-05. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/agudath-israel-v-cuomo/2021-02-05-plaintiffs-letter-proposed-pi-order/, SHA-256 b943cbe77ef6538e6868dc7bf0419cefabecf116e76468a1cbd8a120199f98e8.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP 
875 Third Avenue 
New York, New York  10022 
troutman.com 
Avi Schick 
avi.schick@troutman.com 
February 5, 2021 
VIA ECF 
The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto 
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York  
225 Cadman Plaza East 
Brooklyn, NY  11201 
Re: 
Agudath Israel of America, et al. v. Andrew M. Cuomo, No. 1:20-cv-4834 (E.D.N.Y.)
Dear Judge Matsumoto: 
As directed by this Court at the status conference earlier today, we have enclosed a 
proposed preliminary injunction order that is nearly identical to the proposed order that the parties 
previously discussed.  Defendant consents to the language in this proposed Order, with the 
exception of one sentence that it will write to the Court about separately.   
As discussed at the status conference this morning, Defendant also requests additional 
language providing that the preliminary injunction would terminate by its own terms if Defendant 
issues a revised executive order.  Plaintiffs believe that neither of these features were contained in 
the Court’s January 19, 2021 Order granting the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction against the 
10 and 25-person limits on houses of worship in Executive Order 202.68, and are not necessary 
here.  If Defendant subsequently issues a new or revised executive order, he is free to raise the 
issue to the Court and address its impact at the appropriate time. 
Respectfully, 
Avi Schick 
Cc: Counsel for Defendant (via ECF) 
Case 1:20-cv-04834-KAM-RML   Document 39   Filed 02/05/21   Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1092

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.nyed.454069.39.0.pdf
Size: 48,627 bytes
SHA-256: b943cbe77ef6538e6868dc7bf0419cefabecf116e76468a1cbd8a120199f98e8
Our copy: gov.uscourts.nyed.454069.39.0.pdf
Original: archive.org