Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Agudath Israel of America v. Cuomo Plaintiffs' letter submitting proposed preliminary injunction order (Feb. 5, 2021) — Agudath Israel v. Cuomo (2d Cir.)

Court filing

Plaintiffs' letter submitting proposed preliminary injunction order (Feb. 5, 2021) — Agudath Israel v. Cuomo (2d Cir.)

Filed February 5, 2021 in Agudath Israel of America v. Cuomo; one of 37 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Filed2021-02-05

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York · No. 1:20-cv-04834-KAM-RML · Doc. 39 · 2021-02-05 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP 
875 Third Avenue 
New York, New York  10022 
troutman.com 
Avi Schick 
avi.schick@troutman.com 
February 5, 2021 
VIA ECF 
The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto 
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York  
225 Cadman Plaza East 
Brooklyn, NY  11201 
Re: 
Agudath Israel of America, et al. v. Andrew M. Cuomo, No. 1:20-cv-4834 (E.D.N.Y.)
Dear Judge Matsumoto: 
As directed by this Court at the status conference earlier today, we have enclosed a 
proposed preliminary injunction order that is nearly identical to the proposed order that the parties 
previously discussed.  Defendant consents to the language in this proposed Order, with the 
exception of one sentence that it will write to the Court about separately.   
As discussed at the status conference this morning, Defendant also requests additional 
language providing that the preliminary injunction would terminate by its own terms if Defendant 
issues a revised executive order.  Plaintiffs believe that neither of these features were contained in 
the Court’s January 19, 2021 Order granting the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction against the 
10 and 25-person limits on houses of worship in Executive Order 202.68, and are not necessary 
here.  If Defendant subsequently issues a new or revised executive order, he is free to raise the 
issue to the Court and address its impact at the appropriate time. 
Respectfully, 
Avi Schick 
Cc: Counsel for Defendant (via ECF) 
Case 1:20-cv-04834-KAM-RML   Document 39   Filed 02/05/21   Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1092

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nyed.454069.39.0.pdf
Size
48,627 bytes
SHA-256
b943cbe77ef6538e6868dc7bf0419cefabecf116e76468a1cbd8a120199f98e8
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nyed.454069.39.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top